this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
789 points (96.0% liked)

Open Source

44755 readers
218 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Brave is essentially just Chrome with an adblocker, a bunch of bloatware, and a bunch of controversies.

Brave took BAT donations in YouTuber's names without their consent, with them keeping the money if the YouTubers didn't claim it. https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/2019/01/13/brave-web-browser-no-longer-claims-to-fundraise-on-behalf-of-others-so-thats-nice/

Brave's search engine crawler hides itself from websites by pretending to be Googlebot, and Meta (Facebook) buys API access from them to train their AI. https://stackdiary.com/brave-selling-copyrighted-data-for-ai-training/

The business model of Brave rewards as a whole is to block all other ad networks to replace them with their own, which is unfair as only YouTubers and websites that have joined can make money from most Brave users.

If Brave actually cared, they would create an acceptable ads style feature which was free for everyone and allowed simple contextual banners while blocking ads which track you, take up most of the page, or have NSFW content.

Their approach is monopolistic as they have full control and can strangle YouTubers and websites by dropping pay at any time.

And Brenden Eich has said on Twitter that he plans to release "Brave Origin", which is a paid version of Brave without the bloatware. That name is ironic as he is admitting that his browser is commercialised and bloated, which is similar to when gorhill gave uBlock way to Chris Aljoudi who commercialised it, which led him to create uBlock Origin.

If you use Brave, ditch it and look at using Librewolf or Helium instead, which both include no ads nor tracking and don't have Brave News, Rewards, Wallet, Talk etc bloatware.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Maragato@lemmy.world 95 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

I always use and recommend hardened Firefox + Ublock. As a search engine, I use Qwant, which is based in the EU and uses its own search engine whenever possible rather than Google, Bing, etc. And there is another reason not to recommend using Brave. Among its investors is Peter Thiel, the most controversial figure in the investment world. Search for Peter Thiel's controversial statements in your favourite search engine and you will see for yourself.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 88 points 1 month ago

Brave is the browser version of Honey. It blocks 3rd party ads and inserts its own, taking the money. Either block the ads or don’t but this is shitty.

[–] observes_depths@aussie.zone 59 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Honestly what do people have against Firefox that can't be fixed with plugins? It's the only decent browser that isn't chrome based, and I think that deserves support. And with plugins and sync it's a great experience.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Firefox is great. Mozilla, however, is making some weird moves every now and then. A lot of people don't quite trust Mozilla to have their interests at heart anymore.

The obvious solution is to use a Firefox fork. I have no idea whether there's a meaningful difference between the various Firefox forks, and would welcome a summary.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sobchak@programming.dev 12 points 1 month ago

Mozilla changed their privacy policy and terms of use about a year ago in ways that show they cannot be trusted. I think Librewolf offers more privacy/security features than Firefox can with plugins (disabling some canvas features that are used for fingerprinting for example). I think Firefox has some advertising/tracking crap enabled by default too (PPA API?). IDK, I just don't trust them anymore with their policy changes. Mullvad Browser is even more "hardened," but less convenient than Librewolf.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 58 points 1 month ago (7 children)

This is pretty nihilist to say, but we probably need to stop using what we're calling the internet today.

The web is not the innocent platform it once was in the 90s and early 00s. Privacy is practically nonexistent and the workarounds like disabling javascript break so much of it that what's left is hardly usable.

There's no worthwhile alternatives imo. There's no major competing internetworks or 'web browsing' alternatives outside of modern html/css/js... and there really should be.

The internet evolved towards money making and nobody really stopped and made offshoots that are just cool fun things without the endless goal of capital.

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world 72 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem with the internet is not the internet itself, but the big tech platforms.

By using sites like Mastodon and Lemmy, using a browser with uBlock Origin installed, and disabling Web & App activity, personalised ads, etc on your phone, you are taking a stand, and routing around the bad stuff exactly as intended.

[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 24 points 1 month ago (5 children)

It just isn't enough man. We're still dependent on a handful of sources for everything. Adblockers break for me practically every single day.

I don't have solutions. I just see privacy slipping away at scale and i'm afraid where we will end up in just a few years.

We can't opt out of the system either because too much of it is necessary. Can anyone truly say they don't need google? ever? I stick to stuff like lemmy and I use duck duck go, but I don't think ddg is permanent.

Everything just seems aligning for us to have digital IDs and fingerprints that are tracked with metadata and sold freely to any buyer with enough money. Combine that with technologies like flock and all the facial recognition tech everywhere, payment being basically completely digital today and sold/shared to anyone willing to pay... and every move we make is completely tracked and known.

We're at a point now where the tech used in The Dark Knight by batman to solve crime at the expense of everyone's privacy is here, and it's even worse. Nobody will destroy it because it's too powerful to make money and crush dissent. With how dire the political situation is and how they are literally telling us now to not believe what we see, instead believe what we say... i'm worried, like so many others are.

No one person should have as much power as even a billionaire has, and there are so many who have more than that. The only end to tyranny is our lifespans, until that is no longer a limiting factor from technology.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 12 points 1 month ago

We can't opt out of the system either because too much of it is necessary. Can anyone truly say they don't need google? ever?

Yes. I switched to Qwant some years ago, and about a year back I switched to Kagi. Haven't seen the Google Search page in years at this point.

The only thing I use from Google still is YouTube. There are also alternatives, I've spent some time with PeerTube and found things I enjoy, and I don't mind supporting Nebula, which is also a nice platform. That said, I could probably just cut it all off. It frees up time to do something else.

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Install uBlock Origin and disable any others then the ad blocker problem will be solved.

As for other things, look for backups. If DDG shuts down, search up alternatives. If piefed.social shuts down, find another instance, and do on.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

If you want to experience the old internet: https://kagi.com/smallweb

A curated list of sites with specific criteria, I’ve found a bunch of good stuff from there

[–] morto@piefed.social 12 points 1 month ago

I'd say we don't need go go so far as to stop using the internet (there are open and free services we can use), but I'd agree that we need to reduce our overall internet usage as way to fight aginst the system. Many times, there aren't alternatives to things, and the alternative can be doing something else! Doing something with out life time that the corporations have been stealing.

And the tech industry have become the main players int he economy and in many destructive and unethical practices in the world, that by reducing our internet usage, we are working against them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 1 month ago (5 children)

An extra reason: Eich is a homophobic asshole and an anti-masker

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 46 points 1 month ago

I never used it specifically because of it being run by Brenden Eich. I have no intention of knowingly throwing my towel in and helping to enrich someone who's thrown his money around to strip people of the right to marry who they want because he finds it icky.

I'm sure there's other bad shit from him but after that I just treat him and anything he does as pure toxin.

If that sounds harsh, well, I don't give a fuck.

[–] kratoz29@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 month ago (14 children)

I am pretty set with Firefox in Android and desktop to be honest.

I cringe a little when users praise Brave as being the best ad-less YouTube solution (especially android users since we have revanced here!), no bro, there is no way using the web version of YT is better than revanced, or any other apps on mobile.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I remember Brave was popular among MAGA-type people during Trump's first term. I suspect it's likely the same.

The logo has a striking resemblance to one I remember seeing on a big pro-Trump community. It's described here https://www.vox.com/2019/8/29/20838289/trump-fascist-lion-head-bull-testicles-video-twitter basically the logo is associated with Mussolini.

In addition if you check the Wikipedia article you'll notice this:

In August 2016, the company had received at least US$7 million in angel investments from venture capital firms, including Peter Thiel's Founders Fund, Propel Venture Partners, Pantera Capital, Foundation Capital and the Digital Currency Group.[13]

Moreover some right-wing type people expressed their "solidarity" with Brendan Eich for his anti LGBT stance so they used Brave.

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 25 points 1 month ago

After decades of being a Google fanboy and using nothing but Chrome, my bf proudly told me he'd installed Brave after he got tired of his favorite websites being nothing but ads. I wouldn't use it personally for the reasons you mention, but I think it's a positive step for some people.

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

I won’t use a chromium based browser at all, especially Brave.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I'm too ready to ladybird browser to be ready in a few years.

[–] frgl@feddit.org 7 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I was looking forward to ladybird until I saw social media posts from the person who runs the project, like:

In recent years I've attended multiple software conference talks that had unrelated extreme political rhetoric in slides, such as "fuck [name]" and "punch [group]".

Whenever this happened, some of the audience would clap and cheer, I'd roll my eyes, and the talk would get back on topic.

Fast-forward to today, and look at how many people in our industry are openly celebrating the murder of someone they decided was a "nazi" and "fascist". Turns out these people were more serious than I thought.

As someone who's repeatedly been called a "nazi" and "fascist" myself for disagreements with far-left ideology, I know how easily those labels get thrown around. And honestly, this is making me seriously reconsider which conferences I attend.

There's a hateful rot within our industry. It shouldn't be socially acceptable to cheer for murder. We need to do more than roll our eyes.

source: https://nitter.net/awesomekling/status/1967178708852097278

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jokeyrhyme@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I posted this a year or two ago and got hit by a huge wave of furious Brave users lol. Occasionally to this day someone will stumble on it and post some tirade

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mrnobody@reddthat.com 21 points 1 month ago (9 children)

I would recommend Ecosia as a search engine, Waterfox as a browser, and Lumo as an AI chatbot if you're fixed on using AI.

Waterfox is Firefox with all privacy settings on. Simple enough.

Ecosia is a German-based search engine company that uses profits for replanting trees and reforestation. They use several resources for search results, so understand it's not 100% based on pushing full privacy. I just figure they're doing good with their money.

Lumo is the Proton-based AI that's Mistral at the heart (French-based ai company focused on privacy) with some other tools under proton's belt too.

Combined, I think this gives everyone/anyone a potent level of security/privacy with out-of-the-box use and no special tweaks or settings required.

You could go one step further and use 9.9.9.9 for DNS either at the browser level or gateway level for the whole home!

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I want to love ecosia because of their unique climate projects, but the company is kinda going to shit internally.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] mr_noxx@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 16 points 1 month ago

Don't forget that they used to add referral parameters to links you clicked so they got a kickback from you clicking things from anywhere even if they didn't make that link for you.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

Desktop = Librewolf, Mullvad and hardened firefox browsers. Strictly separating uses. Mobile (Android) = Cromite, Brave, Firefox and Tor. Again, separating uses.

[–] Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago

I don't like Brave or the amount of bloat. Sadly what is missing from basically all Chromium forks is even basic browser anti-fingerprinting. The only other real example I can think of is Cromite, which is what i recommend people use instead of Brave.

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I dislike any browser which blocks content (such as ads) by default. It may sound silly, but Imo, that's not what a browser should be doing. It's job is to act as an HTTP client, render HTML and do caching, storage and all the management which goes with it and offer any tools to tinker with it.
The meaning of the content displayed should be of no concern to the browser as it is subjective.
I will install an addon to deal with unwanted content as I see fit. Firefox is getting kinda bloated with all the things which come with it (pocket, accounts, default bookmarks...), but I can live with that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm just glad people are finally starting to mention LibreWolf as the first go-to.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Do people realize that if Firefox dies (in the many ways that could be interpreted), all of these downstream forks will also die right?

Like, the work to in essence remove unwanted parts of a code base is admirable but its an utterly miniscule fraction of the work that goes into maintaining a modern browser, keeping up with standards, sending people to be voices at conventions, etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chirospasm@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

If it's viable for you, slightly modified Mulvad browser + Searxing for search.

Mullvad browser is a variant of the Tor browser, but rather than being used to connect to Tor, it's built on the stripped away version of Firefox that Tor builds. This means no 'phoning home' telemetry to Mozilla or Google. The only default connection Mullvad browser uses -- and this might be why I would suggest modifying it -- is the DNS gets routed through Mullvad. Nothing wrong with that, as they have some solid adblocking DNS servers. But: having a choice for that is good. The default should not be assumed.

Searxing uses a number of search indexes that have been consistently effective when compared to commercial search engines, and it's open source and deployable on, say, a home server. There used to be some public instances available. Searxing is good.

Were setting up a Searxing service for yourself somewhere not as viable, and you want to try a service that you pay for (rather than them using your data as 'payment'), I would recommend something like Kagi. They offer an interesting feature to their service, and this is why I suggest them: they have a privacy tokenized search, which valdidates but obsfucates you as a user when you make a search request. I think it is smartly engineered, and I can appreciate it for what it is.

For privacy and security purposes, alike, I would avoid Zen and Floorp. They do not get security updates as often.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Helium has poor anti-fingerprinting.

Firefox derivatives don't support google meet well.

any better ideas?

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] url@feddit.fr 7 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I personally don't use or like it. But nowadays I see it installed to people's phone. Which is thousand times better than chrome.
People around me are too Brain washed to understand " install a Firefox based Browser and install Ublock origin "

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›