this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
103 points (96.4% liked)

News

36796 readers
2767 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

FCC disputes long-standing view that the shows are exempt from equal-time rule.

The equal-time rule, formally known as the Equal Opportunities Rule, applies to radio or TV broadcast stations with FCC licenses to use the public airwaves. When a station gives time to one political candidate, it must provide comparable time and placement to an opposing candidate if an opposing candidate makes a request.

The rule has an exemption for candidate appearances on bona fide news programs. As the FCC explained in 2022, “appearances by legally qualified candidates on bona fide newscasts, interview programs, certain types of news documentaries, and during on-the-spot coverage of bona fide news events are exempt from Equal Opportunities.”

Entertainment talk shows have generally been treated as bona fide news programs for this purpose. But Carr said in September that he’s not sure shows like The View should qualify for the exemption, and today’s public notice suggests the FCC may no longer treat these shows as exempt.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 64 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is where the old Stephen Colbert would have come in handy. Most conservatives had no idea he was making fun of them.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 2 months ago

The Bush administration asked him to appear at the White House Press dinner, because they thought he was a Republican, and would roast all the liberals.

That's how stupid the Bush Administration was, and yet somehow the Republicans figured out to be stupider, and invented MAGA.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 37 points 2 months ago

I don't think they thought this one through. You absolutely don't want to be putting republicans on stage with comedians that's a really bad idea.

Most of these shows would love to get a republican on so they could ask them very simple questions that they know they won't be able to answer.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

It's going to be deliciously ironic if actual leftists use this to get air time

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Now we come to the section of the show we would really like everyone to switch off from, where somebody with an actual qualification and experience in the subject matter explains how we've spent the last 45 minutes effectively lying to you.

Thats assuming they don’t just enforce this one way. With Trump, you have to expect it’s going to be one set of rules for his friends and an entirely different set of rules for everyone else.

[–] brooke592@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

It's only going to apply to left-leaning shows by forcing them to host conservatives.

Right-leaning shows will find some way to get the supreme court to side with them and give them an exemption.

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)
  1. President Ronald Reagan, Republican, revoked the equal time rule in the 80s.
  2. The equal time rule was limited to news broadcasts in the public interest. It did not apply to entertainment like late night talk shows.
  3. The FCC has no jurisdiction over cable TV, Satellite TV, or streaming providers. Only over the air broadcasts are regulated by the FCC.
[–] Muehe@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The FCC has no jurisdiction over cable TV, Satellite TV, or streaming providers. Only over the air broadcasts are regulated by the FCC.

Any source on this? Wikipedia says the opposite:

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is an agency of the United States federal government that regulates communications by radio, television, wire, internet, Wi-Fi, satellite, and cable across the United States.

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There is no statutory authority for the FCC to regulate content over any medium other than over the air broadcast which is licensed. There are regulations that affect regional monopoly status, pricing, etc.

The FCC also has no authority to regulate content in print media, recorded music, live performances, etc. It exists to regulate limited access to public airwaves, not privately owned infrastructure.

https://www.broadcastlawblog.com/2022/05/articles/does-the-fcc-regulate-internet-content-and-companies/

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Just let those talk show hosts roast every damn one of them with continuous accurate questions designed to hurt their weak feelings. Should be a dream for some of these guys who you can tell would really like to rip on some of their guest. Let them all keep score by how many they get to leave the interview.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That would be applied to both sides, yes?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The republican news sources are generally cable in part to avoid any accountability

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Well you say that but CBS...

[–] brooke592@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The fuck kind of rule is that?

Is this why we have to entertain anti-vaxxers?

[–] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago

Anti vaccine dickheads will not even be the worst, we will have to have nazis come on and argue for exterminating half the population, in thinly veiled terms. Fun times. It was always going to happen with captured opposition parties and no one trying to free them though fyi.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's a rule from the early 1900's when there were only like 3-4 news sources reaching 100% of the people, instead of today where hundreds of sources can sometimes reach as little as 1-3% of people and some only reach 40-50% max.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 0 points 2 months ago

Well also back then there was a common reality, and none of the sides lied through their teeth to try and overthrow representative government, proscribe their opponents and critics, to justify federal agents summarily executing someone on the street under false pretense and to persecute her associates, etc.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 6 points 2 months ago

How does the View not count an interview program? It doesn't specify the quality of the interviews.

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

please, bring it back. it’s what created modern fox news https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_doctrine

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago

And what about news shows, including those that are claimed not to be news shows in order to avoid regulation?

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Why the fuck do we have so many shit laws on the books. "Oh yeah that's the free speech lever we made in the 60s. We don't really use it but its nice to have around"

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I would love a return of the FCC equal time rule.

I'm tired of republican propaganda and bullshit dominating the news every goddamn day.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

With this administration you know some ideas will be considered more equal than others.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 2 months ago

He's going to be pretty disappointed when he tries to kill The View. They have ALWAYS included Republican hosts on the show, and they treat them with respect, even when the Republican didn't show respect in turn (like that shrieking Meghan McCain).

Right now, there are TWO Republican representatives on The View, so he's going to have a hard time claiming they are only spewing a left wing perspective. His real problem is that his own party is so toxic, the Republican reps on The View are generally against MAGA, too. That isn't political, it's just moral.

Is his argument going to be that all broadcasts MUST be the same as the ADMINISTRATION'S opinion?

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I'm glad somebody's finally taking on the important issues affecting the American people.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

What republican not infested by brainworms WANTS to go on these shows?

Hell Trump famously avoids anything not Fox News because hes a pussy ass bitch that can’t handle criticism.