this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
45 points (97.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

45665 readers
828 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rant warning!

I mean I just quit a office call, the share screen ribbon wouldn't disappear, opened task manager to kill it nope not found, finally had to select a "quit teams" option from start window. Note this is still windows 10.

Further the entire teams app is sloppy, when I start listing, the enter works but within the same message (when unintended) I have to ensure I click shift+enter to enter a new line. I can't choose between enter and shift+enter.

A few questions now:

  • why/how do these guys design a product this way
  • Does it mean Microsoft can keep running any app which necessarily doesn't appear on my task manager?
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago

Because it actually makes a lot of sense from a business perspective to have your meeting software integrated with your messaging software integrated with your document storage, etc. MS saw the success of things like Zoom and Slack and said "we can do that!"

And the thing about large companies with big budgets is that they get things done. Maybe it is shitty, but it is done. And the thing about an IM client is that anyone can think up the idea... So the difference between MS and a startup like Slack is that there were 100 other Slack-like startups that failed to make a useable product. Slack made a product that worked because statistically, someone has to - and then everyone uses the product because it works. But MS is not going to run out of venture capital or new CS grads eager to work 80 hour weeks to "change the world" - they will keep plowing money and manpower into a product until it is ready to ship, goddammit!

So Teams stumbles across the finish line, strictly inferior to its competitors. Except that it has an ace in its back pocket... the fact that so many businesses already run windows. Already have MS 365 subscriptions. MS can pitch ecosystem integration as a selling point, and then undercut their competitors on price to paper over any deficits in functionality. And 55 year old CFOs of accounting firms see this and say "yes, let's do that!"

And thus, Teams

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 20 minutes ago

I have to use Teams for work but I'm on Linux so I just use the web app in Firefox. Other then minor, irritating UI decisions (WTF is the 'Activity' tab for?) I don't have any issues. Video calls work fine, screen sharing works, notifications work. When something breaks I just reload the page. If people have so many issues maybe try using the web app?

[–] remon@ani.social 1 points 28 minutes ago

It's quite literally the worst chat app I ever had to use. It can't even handle fucking copy+paste without messing up formatting every single time. Constantly crashes, can't handle notifications across devices, doesn't work properly with even "teams certified" headsets, uses 3 times more resources than any comparable app ... it's fucking bloatware with a chat function.

Fuck Teams and everyone that made it. I hope the get cancer.

[–] Pechente@feddit.org 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Seriously, teams is one of the worst apps I have to use on a regular basis. It’s insanely buggy, especially if you are a freelancer working in multiple teams.

  • parts of the app don’t load correctly
  • parts of the app don‘t support touch very well
  • you get useless notifications, i.e. for a thread you have open or an action you caused yourself but completely miss others
  • the UI has SO MANY flaws like giving people different colored placeholder avatars in different parts of the app which made me assign tasks to the wrong person a few times
  • it needs its own audio driver on macOS which is probably invasive and does a shit job with airpods

There’s probably more I can’t think of right now but teams actively kills my productivity and I dread having to open it. I don’t understand how businesses can rely on this so heavily and I‘m wondering how incredibly incompetent the team developing it at Microsoft can be.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -4 points 38 minutes ago (1 children)

I quite literally teach and consult on Teams, and have for 8 years now. I worked with Lync, Skype for Business, and Communicator before that.

People complain about it all the time, and yet... I've never had any significant issues with it.

Other than M365 outages, which impact everyone, I've never seen it crash. I've never had issues not loading. I've never had sound or sharing issues that couldn't be resolved by clicking the dropdown and selecting the correct option.

It can be a bit slow, especially loading file related stuff, but it's not any worse than a network drive.

Placeholder avatars in different parts of the App? Teams doesn't even support task assignment, tasks are handled in MS Planner which is an entirely different product that just happens to be visible inside Teams if you want.

Touch? Mac? Airpods? What the fuck are you doing? You aren't doing real business tasks if you're using an iPad.

Maybe the people with problems are the ones running 10 year old hardware with a barely supported operating system?

[–] Pechente@feddit.org 1 points 34 minutes ago (1 children)

Touch? Mac? Airpods? What the fuck are you doing? You aren't doing real business tasks if you're using an iPad.

I'm using it on the phone sometimes to reply to people which I don't think is a weird use case. The AirPods issue happens on macOS and I'm not sure if you're just ignorant but lots of businesses operate on macOS, especially in my industry (ui design, frontend web dev) it's unusual to even see Windows.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -2 points 26 minutes ago

"lots of businesses operate on macOS"

No, they definitely do not. If you go into any business in Canada or the US with more than 200 employees, they are running windows on the computers sitting in front of every office drone they have.

Very specific industries or business may, especially those who are stuck on Adobe's software, but "lots" is extremely far from the truth.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 26 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
  • it gave them an excuse to kill Skype
  • they weren’t willing to let Zoom hog the spotlight
[–] DarkShaggy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Wait let's not forget live meeting!!!!

[–] justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

A long, long time ago, there was an online messaging tool called ICQ. You didnt even have callsigns in it, you had a randomly generated number you shared with your friends. You chatted. Had fun. Life was good.

Then there was AOL instant messenger. It largely replaced ICQ in the US. It added emoticons.

Then there was MSN Messenger. It tied into the MSN gaming zone(Before MS killed it to make Xbox Live. You could play games with your friends through it. You could do rudimentary video chats.

Then you had Skype(pre-MS. Better video, not tied to MS).

MS makes MSN Messenger into Lynx and adds it to office. Its not good.

Then you had Google Hangouts. Better chat, fun features, tied to your google account.

Then you had MS owned Skype as Skype for Business. Largely replaces Hangouts because Google enshittifies everything, not because it is good.

You also have former Vancouver startup Slack. Its fantastic. Until Salesforce buys it.

Now we have the bastard officespring of Skype for Business: MS Teams.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 36 minutes ago

Lync, not Lynx.

And technically Lync got birthed from the corpse of Office Communicator, not MSN messenger.

[–] mhzawadi@lemmy.horwood.cloud 1 points 56 minutes ago

Google meet is the only thing I have used that doesn't need a desktop program, I used it over lockdown and got the in-laws to join (both very not technical).

I can't say much for chat, as it was never any good. We used slack for text chat, but that has gone down hill with Salesforce.

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 17 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Because they don't have to. This quarterly report is good! Copilot use is up (because it was shoved into yet another app) and costs are down (because they layed even more people off). Businesses are locked in for the near future, so core sales remain high.

It doesn't matter desktop Linux use drastically increased. That doesn't affect this quarter. This quarter is all about cutting costs and pushing AI. If there is a problem in a few quarters, it doesn't matter. You sold your stocks by then.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

That's nothing, Google had almost a dozen different chat apps at different times, some of them simultaneously.

As for

Does it mean Microsoft can keep running any app which necessarily doesn't appear on my task manager?

A lot of background services run as ‘svchost’, which loads the particular library implementing the actual service. Services can be added by applications, from what I understand. They all look the same in the task manager, and also can't be properly selected in a firewall app because again it's the same executable.

This is not to say that Teams specifically uses an svchost service, but they could if they wanted.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 19 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Why do you think there's the growing mass exodus towards Linux?

Microsoft laying off programmers and staff like they're having human diarrhea, while replacing experienced programmers with artificial ~~intelligence~~ ignorance...

You just figuring this shit out?

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -2 points 35 minutes ago

There's no mass exodus towards Linux in the business user space.

It's still 99.9% Microsoft Windows.

[–] vaderaj@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I use Linux on my personal computer, I had to stick to windows during my uni days (may be because of loads of reports I had to write) but expected something better from their pro version?

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, it sucks. Windows used to be dependable and solid, the whole point of the OS was IT JUST WORKS. They had some downturns in the past (Vista, 8) but you could just skip those. XP, 7, etc. Now though? There is no skipping 11, not if you want security updates. They could have made Copilot it's own app that you can ignore, but no, even notepad needs AI for some reason. The start menu has ads, the notification center has ads.

Finally pushed me to switch to Mint this past year. My SO followed too. Been happier with it. Feels like I'm in control of the OS again, and it is there to do what I wish. Never going back.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

If I need to write a report, I can write it in nano, fuckall with the font formatting and all. If the person reading my report can't accept my report on an algorithm to generate the value of pi unless it's formatted with a particular page layout, then fuck them.

If they're more worried about fonts and page layouts than the actual content of the text and fomulas, then they don't know how to read or verify the algorithm in the first place.

[–] Tanoh@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Loads of formating for reports can be done with text only as well. Markdown or LaTeX, to name just two.

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

My old school had to switch to Microsoft Teams (from Google Classroom) and the head of ICT told everyone that he thought that Teams website was ridiculously slow, the app moreso, but it was necessary as part of a transition from Google's suite (Docs, Slides, Drive, Classroom) to Microsoft's (Word, PowerPoint, OneDrive, Teams)

Pretty much everybody complained about the switch to Teams since it was really slow, sometimes taking several minutes to load the app on older computers (e.g. school computers). I assume they switched to all-Microsoft to reduce costs (I remember being told that, since they were paying for both Office 365 and Google Cloud before), and they mentioned other reasons too (e.g. students overseas in mainland China can't access Google) but I forgot most of them.

[–] radix@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

There is no market Microsoft won't half-ass* their way into.

* Purely as an expression. Teams is nowhere near usable enough to give it that much credit.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

M$ did build a solid colon for Teams tho

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 hours ago
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Other tech companies — Zoom and Slack — were becoming successful. Microsoft cannot allow that, so they made another terrible product and then had their marketing team start felating incompetent executives.

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Shh... They'll hear you. Stop using antichrist software.

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 hours ago

🐧 oh we’re coming, bitch