this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
98 points (100.0% liked)

news

24593 readers
569 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 47 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He can't even make cars anymore. You can't make this shit up!

Image depicts a viral moment when a Tesla robot was at a function and was recorded demonstrating some peculiar behavior where it appears to reach in front of its eyes in a gesture akin to removing glasses or goggles whereupon it appears to immediately lose control of its functions and fall down. It is speculated that the robot was being remotely controlled by a human using VR and that the gesture the robot made was the user removing the VR headset which would explain why the robot fell as the remote user disconnected.

[–] FnordPrefect@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I never noticed this before, but does that thing explode a water bottle when the hand gets put down, like before it even falls? That seems like a dangerous amount of force/pressure to apply without any failsafes or anything.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 week ago

:live-bazinga-bot-reaction:

[–] Commie_Chameleon@hexbear.net 35 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I know this won’t affect the stock price (which will keep pumping anyway), but who’s going to buy the robots? There’ll be some enthusiasts sure, but most people actually need cars and will take out a loan to get these. The people that actually need these robots (assuming they even worked in the first place) would be people that need help around the house, and realistically most of them can’t afford this thing. So do we see a repeat of the parking lots filled with cyber trucks, but with robots instead? Or do they just give them out to influencers and con enough rich assholes into buying them to make it work (probably not gonna happen lol).

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's no way Tesla robots will ever be good enough to do anything useful like house chores or whatever. MAYBE if he sells them with a subscription and it's actually just some dude in East Asia controlling the robot. But then most people wouldn't want them because now you're paying random servants from around the world to hop into your house to serve you.

Actually as I was typing this I realized that is exactly the kind of disgusting bullshit that Tesla owners would love. "Oh yes see it's not slavery because these people get to stay in their country and their homes and make a wage to be my servant! That means I'm fueling underserved economies! I'm saving the world with my Tesla Servant! Global economics! Together Musk is lifting people out of poverty!"

Fuck these are going to be wildly successful for all the wrong reasons aren't they.

[–] Commie_Chameleon@hexbear.net 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh yeah to be clear I don’t think they’ll work autonomously either. But you’re 100% right that all the wrong people are going to be able to pay Elon a monthly fee to have a servant from another country around the house. doomer

[–] FidelChadstro@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Spending $100k to buy a surveillance robot servant remotely piloted by a child in Bangladesh is simply the price one must pay to not allow a poor into one's house. If you saw the documentary Parasite, you'd know why we must take these security measures

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thilo@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] shath@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

just like all the other scams to inflate stock prices

[–] thilo@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago

if only people would remember valuation ≠ value more often 😮‍💨

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago

The robots will be used for military purposes since the $1 trillion budget has to go somewhere.

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

idk, The Market is not looking pleased at the moment, at least in the short term.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 35 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The market will come around once Tesla announces that the robots will have a pussy.

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Black Mirror episode where "Pesla" announces a sexbot but it can't nail the AI so they have to hire out of work software engineers to operate the bots with VR rigs.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

The robot you've bought is actually just a guy in a costume.

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

That's probably something that could get some VC funding with a hip name and an app.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago

pussy

Yet another subject where I have zero faith in Musk’s knowledge or experience

If we all gave ourselves the Men-In-Black mind eraser flash he’d be the first to use science and logic to re-invent guys who think the female orgasm is a myth, starting with himself.

[–] ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If Musk does do sex bots, I predict the "pussy" is gonna be wrong but he will never correct it because admitting he was wrong about what a vagina looks like would be too embarrassing for his fragile ego.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He could double down on being wrong about them like our friend Ben

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Speaker@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago

Huge lots full of inert robots is pretty peak cyberpunk. I doubt these things could hold a gun, so I expect there'll just be a high density explosive module (with recurring subscription) and they'll use them as shock troops for riot dispersal.

[–] Muinteoir_Saoirse@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Rich people import foreign workers to be their hyper-exploited social reproduction labourers. If all the foreign workers that do their social reproduction for them are being deported by ICE, they will need robots. (This assumes the robots will ever function, which they won't, or that they are intended to function someday, which they aren't)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

I was gonna say something like "I'm assuming the idea is to make them do factory work in an attempt to compete with China's robots", but that would be the smart thing to do with them, and Musk isn't one to do smart things. Indeed, reading the article it seems he just intend some pipe-dream about every one having robot butlers or whatever.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rom@hexbear.net 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

At least you can't get trapped inside a robot while you burn to death.

[–] SwagliacciTheBadClown@hexbear.net 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Florida Man was found dead under a MuskBot after excessive lube during apparent sex act attempt with it caused a short and fire.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nothx@hexbear.net 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Boston dynamics has been trying for like 3 decades and their shit still sucks. Elon is gonna succeed in his robotics speed run tho, no doubt.

[–] Guamer@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Define "sucks"? Their stuff's pretty cool from what I've seen.

[–] Lovely_sombrero@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Tesla is betting on a multipurpose humanoid robots. That is the main problem here, it is difficult to make just a single robot that can do everything, instead of a line of different robots for very specific use cases.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nothx@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m just being hyperbolic and sarcastic.

[–] ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Their robots aren't necessarily bad, but the questions are how competitive is their price and how much applications are they being bought and used for?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Carl@hexbear.net 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Dunno about the rest of the US but California's uses car market is absolutely flooded with Model S'. I see first gen ones listed for under 10k. Compare to any other model EV of the same year and entry price and there will be about ten Teslas per other manufacturer. That can't be because they are exceptionally high quality, long lasting vehicles.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would be so afraid of buying a used EV and its battery just being fucked

[–] FidelChadstro@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's easier to check battery health than engine compression nowadays

[–] GiorgioBoymoder@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

literally, an EV will tell you a range estimate based on current charge level (and include ambient/battery temperature in that estimate, maybe even recent terrain/driving behavior).

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

Teslas are known to lie though

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't even know what engine compression is

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

more compression makes your car faster and more fuel efficient, but requires better gas and makes everything hotter.

[–] GiorgioBoymoder@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the piston seals in the cylinders of an ICE car should be (nearly?) air tight. As the car is used the pistons/seals wear down reducing engine performance and efficiency. It can get so bad that the car won't even run, I once test drove a car that started fine but would die at idle speed when warm. It's very expensive to fix, most cars are probably scrap at that point.

special diagnostic tools are needed to get that information from an ICE, whereas an EV will, at the very least, display right on the dash"fully charged : x miles"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

After Muskrat’s heil-spree, a lot of them went up for sale around here too. I’m not saying they aren’t garbage-built death traps either, just that there are multiple contributing factors to people wanting to be rid of their Tesla.

[–] fuckiforgotmypasswor@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

i am literally holding on to my 5-speed manual civic until the thing physically falls apart. why anyone would pay 40-70k for a new car full of useless electronic components and a single ineffective touch screen UI is beyond all comprehension to me

poor people based old gen commuter car gang stay winning

[–] FnordPrefect@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

libertarian-approaching "I mean, why would you ever want to actually go anywhere when you have access to unlimited illegal porn and a fuck-bot?"

(in case it's unclear, I intend this with maximum scorn and derision for Musk)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] miz@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

presumably other swastikars will continue production

[–] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I already wrote this on the other thread, but it's because people aren't buying the S and X. They were like 3% of Tesla sales last year. He kept them going for 10 years longer than he should have just so he could have Tesla models S, 3, X and Y.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OptimusSubprime@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

Fucking melon-musk

There's only one Optimus. Me!

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

I like how he’s never going to release a bipedal Jeeves robot but the news has to report on it like it’s a thing. He’s not pivoting to shit. He’s pivoting to more testosterone treatments. None of these robots are doing shit. They aren’t going to mars. He’s just going to do drugs and post about white South African genocide. Report that. At least include these verifiable facts while writing the rest of the article. Just go pluck something from the last 24 hours of his timeline, he’ll have said something stupid or odious in that time. Probably more than once so you can pick. It would be funny at least.

[–] TheModerateTankie@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

He's going to replace his workers with these robots. He'll have robots to make robots to make cars to sell to robots. 5d chess move. my-hero

[–] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 week ago

they've been test driving some god-awful ugly little new teslas around silicon valley for the past 4 months or so.. they look like they're straight out of cyberpunk 2077 but uglier

[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

Getting an Optimus just to give me piggybacks everywhere

load more comments
view more: next ›