this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
499 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

15044 readers
408 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Originally found on privacy@lemmy.ml

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 133 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Subaru states that by being a passenger, you are considered a user — and by being a user, you have consented to their privacy policy. Several car brands also note that it is a driver’s responsibility to tell passengers about the vehicle's privacy policies.

No way that holds up in court. But in what situation would that appear in court unless someone has money to burn?

[–] FEIN@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago (1 children)

everytime WE get into a car with our friends we ALWAYS read the privacy policy aloud to them right guys

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 5 points 4 days ago

(reads 15 minutes of legalese when the car starts)

"I agree!"

"I agree!"

"I don't!"

"Isn't there someone you forgot to ask?"

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago (2 children)

This kind of shit is what makes me not want an EV, that and I guess the ease of repair but that could change with proper regulation and resources. I'm all for EVs but my current relatively effecient ICE car doesn't spy on me and that's important as well.

[–] Steve@communick.news 77 points 5 days ago (6 children)

It's got nothing to do with EVs.
It's all cars made in the last 6-8 years.

[–] pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

It sort of has something to do with EVs, in that it's hard to find EVs made before this was standard, so if you're looking for cars without it it's hard to find one that doesn't have an ICE engine.

(Where cars aren't avoidable, I do prefer they be electric, as, I'm sure, do many, but the privacy concerns are apparently very real.)

(Edit: hydrogen cars are indeed very neat and more environmentally friendly than electric cars, and in the most ideal scenario what unavoidable car/truck/van usage there was would be hydrogen-powered. It is not AFAIK practical for the average consumer at this time and requires substantial infrastructure updates which the individual consumer can't really do much about beyond lobbying reps, so when it comes down to an individual who does need a car weighing what kind of vehicle to buy, I think it is fair to say that electric cars are better than ICE for the environment but, due to being newer, have more privacy concerns than old ICE vehicles. Neither is as good on either criterion as being able to just go car-free, of course.)

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (8 children)

If it makes you feel better, EVs aren't a real solution to the problems we face anyways, public transport was always the solution and EVs was a way to get consumers to keep focusing on individualism and consumerism to solve societal problems.

Edit: So many replies falling over themselves about how EVs are a good "baby step". They're not. Hydrogen fuel cells is a good baby step. EVs are still extremely extractivist. Lithium batteries are very bad, environmentally speaking. Hydrogen is significantly cleaner. It is avoided because it would require unprofitable infrastructure to be rolled out to support hydrogen vehicles.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Rural places and bigots will still need or want personal cars. Some things like a trades work van or delivery service will still need a car/truck. These might as well be developed as electric. EVs are not the solution to our transportation and environmental issues but they are part of it.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (5 children)

This kind of shit makes me want to build an EV using a kit.

[–] Batmorous@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

This makes me want open source community-made vehicles. Who else is with me on that?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hector@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago

This is the US courts, there absolutely is a chance the soul less mega corporation's arguments get validated by the courts. Trial courts probably not, but on appeal? The federalist society runs the courts, they have a veto on every decision, and they were chosen to side with big money and entrenched interests.

[–] YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth 94 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The very worst offender is Nissan. The Japanese car manufacturer admits in their privacy policy to collecting a wide range of information, including sexual activity, health diagnosis data, and genetic data — but doesn’t specify how. They say they can share and sell consumers’ “preferences, characteristics, psychological trends, predispositions, behavior, attitudes, intelligence, abilities, and aptitudes” to data brokers, law enforcement, and other third parties.

What the actual fuck

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

iirc this got removed shortly after it got attention

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

and not before it was produced? press x to doubt they actually removed it... If there's no independent research and we can't have the CEO's own data, then take it with a big grain of salt

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Here's some tips:

  1. Sticking to this community's name, ditch the automobile all together and adopt a hybrid approach of cycling and public transit. Buy and/or build a good bike or e-bike and learn the local bus route and/or routes of any other public transit.

  2. For those of us still stick in Der Orangenführer's fascist regime, stick to cars made before 2012. Some cars were going to high tech before this but it's bond to be outdated but check if it's still used.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This is reminding me of a talk I had with a mechanic friend in the early 1990s, when integrated electronics started showing up in basic functions of a lot of new cars. People like him, who didn't know crap about computers but were really good at the mechanical concerns when cars were pretty much mechanical devices - fuel goes in here, controlled explosions in that box there turn other things which make wheels go, and a bunch of cords and plumbing to connect it all up and levers and gears to direct the mechanical energy - were having to confront what to do when that mysterious circuit board began to need work.

This talk happened when I was visiting to set up a new cassette-based telephone answering machine for his auto workshop's office and tutor him in its use, because he was that hopeless with electronics.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 83 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I hate the world we’re building.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 71 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I hate the world they’re forcing us to consent to live in.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

They don't want you to know this, but members of the ruling class are human and therefore actually very easy to remove from power. You just take all of the goo out of them and that generally works.

They're not even forcing us to consent. They're forcing us without our consent and then claiming we consented by not having any other choice.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 52 points 5 days ago (1 children)

2023 article. Would be good to have current information.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 38 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It's safe to assume that it only got worse

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Batmorous@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)

Time for opensourcevehicles and opensourcetransit to become a thing. I'm one of many people interested in doing that. Anyone have spitball ideas on how to go about doing that?

Trying to think up some simpler first projects, how to get it funded, and how to get a community for that up and running

Also, some people were interested in making opensourcebusiness community. If anyone is still interested then please do it there was 7 people I remember that were interested at the time for that

We can also get opensourceanimation, opensourceuiux, and way more up and running. To slowly transform our world and get open source to grow even more

Edit: Would be cool for people to get community projects made for bikes, electric bikes, bike-cars, cars, VTOL's, and way more overtime. Trams, trolleys, trains, high speed rail, airplanes, submarines, airships, etc

Edit 2: Main focus being people-focused transit. Didn't realize I was in fuckcars. If we are going to have any transit might as well be open source especially EV's

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 8 points 4 days ago

I love the spirit! I think about open sourcing vehicles all the time, but unfortunately I think the biggest hurdle might be in what constitutes a street-legal vehicle.

Even though there's lots of dangerous problems with closed source cars, I'm pretty sure there's some litany of safety / engineering standards that manufacturers have to meet, as well as passing "smog tests" in many places. (EVs still on the table tho...?)

So, an open source vehicle would be more transparent, which would be a huge win! But also if it was a community initiative like say, RepRap, I imagine there'd be a lot of red tape with user-designed or hypothetically 3D printed cars or somesuch, especially when it comes to safety standards.

The biggest worries I'd have would be how much interest such projects would get from safety engineers and other pros who know how to make the thing not kill the user.

Am I way off? I'd love to hear I'm wrong and there's plenty of hope for this to be a thing. I really hate modern car manufacturers. They all suck. Their proprietary lock-in and user-hostile attitude sucks. We need better. :)

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I would assume an open source e-bike would probably be the place to start.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (8 children)

It's even trickier with EVs.

On the one hand you can charge your EV at home and no one knows about it.

On the other, you can't pay for a public charger with cash, there's always a trail. Cars have unique identifiers that are communicated to the charger when connected. Each time you charge in public they know exactly who are you and what car it is.

[–] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

State sponsored surveillance Flock cameras photographed the chat.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago

Each time you charge in public they know exactly who are you and what car it is.

because they designed it that way. it doesn't need to be designed that way.

and there's no reason you couldn't pay for charging your car in cash just like with a gas pump

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago

There's always plugshare - charge at a random person's house

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Y’all just need to stop being selfish and think about the shareholders.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dan69@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

“Analysts estimate that by 2030, car data monetization could be an industry worth $750 billion.” Yo I bare the weight of the ads on my public bus/train rides.. now why the heck would I want a modern car?

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 5 days ago (2 children)

This is why if you buy a car, you should get a "dumb" car.

[–] dusty_raven@discuss.online 11 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Serious question, what is the best solution to this? My household has three cars, the newest is from 2008. It makes me nervous as to what to do if I wanted a "new" car (I'd never buy an actual new car, just new to me and made in the last ten years).

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Jhuskindle@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

The first one before they started introducing smart features.

[–] elgordino@fedia.io 22 points 5 days ago (6 children)

This is why I drive a 20 year old car.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 5 days ago (3 children)

i wonder if snipping off your car's modem completely stops the flow of data. like sure, your car's CPU is still gathering that data but they have no way to retrieve it. unless you visit a dealership or authorized mechanic shop?

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 15 points 5 days ago (12 children)

Ding ding. Airgaps get broken when you bring it to the dealer, they plug it in, and it downloads and uploads all your data.

You gotta neuter the sensors

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I just saw someone post of open source cars. Now I know why.

[–] mrnobody@reddthat.com 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)

What if:

My car doesn't have a cellular connection? Does it still spy?

I have SatNav, but it doesn't have a hotspot/wifi/cell, does it so collect data somehow? I'm guessing somehow over GPS/sat maybe?

[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Some cars used 3G cellular connections, which is no longer active in most countries.

The only countries with active networks are Croatia, Hong Kong, Ireland, Italy, Slovenia, and South Korea.

Via: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3G#Phase-out

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›