this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
618 points (99.8% liked)

News

36086 readers
3273 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

KEY POINTS

Federal Express sued the U.S. government, seeking a “full refund” of the money the shipping giant paid for tariffs unilaterally imposed by Donald Trump, which the Supreme Court last week ruled were illegal.

FedEx’s suit appears to be the first one filed by a major U.S. company after the Supreme Court decision seeking a refund of the tariffs it has paid.

Other companies filed lawsuits seeking refunds before the high court ruled that the tariffs Trump imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act are illegal.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 24_at_the_withers@lemmy.world 29 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I needed a replacement for an item hat failed under warranty. The original part was made in Canada, and a replacement was mailed to me free of charge. Except, I got a note from FedEx that i had to pay tarriffs... My tariff was $5, but FedEx was charging a $25 tariff handling fee on top of the $5. And if I didn't prepay, they would instead charge $40 total to collect my $5 tarriff.

FUCK FedeEx for having the audacity to request a refund from the federal government on top of their blind extortion. These fuckers need to burn.

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 6 points 15 hours ago

...on christmas eve, federal express delivered a structural modelling kit i ordered from brasil two years ago; on boxing day they submitted a $400 invoice for the related tarriff + brokerage fees...

...at the time, the supreme court ruling was expected shortly after the holiday, so i was in no rush to pay an invoice likely to be voided and unlikely to be refunded, and i waited as the court delayed judgement over the next six weeks...in the six weeks between delivery of my package and the court ruling, federal express have sent me six invoices which remain unopened, that's six past-due notices for a unilateral invoice less than sixty days old...

...i appreciate that they delivered my package on account of shipping fees i paid two years ago, i appreciate that this administration put them in a tough spot and i wish them well with their legal remediation, but i have no intention to pay an illegitimate invoice unlikely ever to be refunded to me as an individual...

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

They'll charge you another $25 fee to process your $5 refund if you want it.

Edit: this was a joke ... i just realized someone that paid a very big tariff might actually think they were offering a refund for $25 and would want it.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 28 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

DID Fed Ex pay those tariffs? It seems to me that those costs were passed on to the consumers.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 19 points 20 hours ago

They're suing on behalf of their customers. I'm sure they will also be spending the settlement on behalf of their customers as well.

This was entirely predictable, also don't expect cost to go down now either.

[–] sirscooter@lemmy.zip 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I agree that Fed Ex should be sending those refunds to everyone who has to pay them.

But I think FedEX should be able to sue. It used to be anything under $600 didn't get a tariff. It was too costly and burdensome on the package handlers to collect the tariff. Also the system was designed to hold those $600 packages, not all the packages. Instead of ramping up Fed Ex had to handle a new system blind, with no preparation time. That had to effect core business

Hell would love to see a class action suit by all the package shippers and handlers against the government for what they had to go through

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago

Can we later sue FedEx, assuming FedEx gets reimbursed? Human centipede that shit.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Corpos passed the cost of those tariffs on to consumers in the form of higher prices. They already GOT paid. But why screw consumers once when you can do it twice?

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

Oh no... It's not just once... They passed the rate of the tarrifs on to us, now they'll recoup the cost that WE paid, AND they'll continue to charge us at those increased rates even if the tarrifs are lifted.

[–] rogsson@piefed.social 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Turns out running a country like a company with no clue how to run a company is a bad idea. 

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah but the casinos… oh nvm.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

How the fuck do you lose money running a casino?!

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 15 hours ago

It makes sense when you realize he only did it to launder money for Russia.

[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 day ago

Get to pay for tariffs twice in the US. First was the cost of the illegal tariffs passed on to the consumer. Second is the refund for the illegal tariffs to the companies as a taxpayer.

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 160 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Hey FedEx, you’re gonna refund the customers that you passed those tariffs onto, right?

Not until they sue fedex

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

Its only been a year and we're at billions in illegal taxes to be returned.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 65 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Governor Pritzker of Illinois has already sent a demand letter for $1700 for each household in Illinois.

They should have to pay back all corporations, and then send a check to every household. It was this administration that caused this, and they should have to pay for it.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Problem is, it won't be paid by Trump & co., it'll be paid by taxpayers. And the tax cuts for the wealthy that depended on the revenue increase from the tariffs, aren't going away.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

So the tax payers get a refund by paying extra taxes. And yet I'm not allowed to pay off MY credit cards with other credit cards. So unfair.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 3 points 16 hours ago

Actually thats called a balance transfer

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 15 hours ago

The tax payers aren't going to get a dime. I guarantee it'll all go to the businesses who passed the costs to the customer.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 95 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Realistically since the American consumer ultimately paid it, it should be returned via a tax credit on our taxes. That was it doesn’t matter if you paid via higher prices, or flat out paid import fees. It goes back to the consumer.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I think maaaaybe on b2b or larger transactions that included a Tariff line item in the invoice. The $2 widget you bought at Dollar Tree, not likely.

From the POV of a business it cost them more labor and money to collect and pay the tariffs and now getting reimbursed and paying the customers/clients back would cost them even more labor and money.

It's an unfunded cluster fuck of an issue that never should have happened to begin with.

[–] null@lemmy.org 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You kept receipts for everything you bought since the tariffs went live?

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nope, which is why it should be a standard amount. For example, Illinois is suing for $1700/person regardless of what they spent. That’s what they calculated out was the average.

[–] null@lemmy.org 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And if you spent more than the $1700?

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 7 points 21 hours ago

It’s never going to be perfect. Good luck with that, but the question is “did you spend more than $1700 in tariffs?” I mean you’re welcome to try to sue every company and the government directly to get it back.

[–] caurvo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 23 hours ago

Hope you kept receipts!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Who doesn't keep receipts?

[–] null@lemmy.org 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is gonna be a clusterfuck.

[–] the_armchair_potato@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

"Clusterfuck" is a great way to describe this administration 🙄

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I should sue for a refund too. It's my money and I want it now.

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Call JG Wentworth. 877-CASH-NOW!

[–] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago

The man lives immortalized in every 2000 era human

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

They'll get their tariff money back - if they remember to bribe Donny. Otherwise, he'll probably try to get federal agencies to harass them.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

he'll probably try to get federal agencies to harass them.

Government and corporations at war with each other? Go on, tell me more.

🍿🍿🍿🍿

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

It only works when they aren't bribing each other off.

[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah Trump now you have to pay everyone back with all the country's money you laundered away from US and venezuela, and the corrupt deals you made with, among others, saudi arabia. Maybe you can still make some coin on the international trade you wanna set up with ruzzia. Hope he also has to pay back everyone he scammed with his bitcoins.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 15 hours ago

The problem is the money is just going to go to the businesses who passed the cost to their customers.

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Who do I sue to get back the illegal tarrifs I paid on the hot tub I imported?

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago
load more comments
view more: next ›