this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
387 points (99.0% liked)

News

36915 readers
3751 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 85 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Keep in mind, this is just what he's actually admitting to. Like with all liars and cheats, the reality is usually much, much worse

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 month ago (19 children)

He calls them women. Today maybe, but what were they back then?

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] homoludens@feddit.org 84 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I learn a lot about him from the fact that he apologizes to his staff but not the victims.

edit: I meant the survivors of the abuse network, sorry for not making that clearer.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They weren’t victims. They were both adults. This is your standard billionaire affair as far as we know.

[–] AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

pretty sure their talking about epstein survivors. I don't think anyone outside of personal acquaintances really care about the affairs at this point.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is it confirmed that he abused children?

[–] AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

does it matter? it's pretty obvious everyone of a certain wealth knew exactly what epstein was up to. knowingly and intentionally having ties with someone like that is enough for the epstein victims to deserve more of an apology than his employees.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Their point probably is that Epstein had his hands in a lot more than just procuring underage girls. Not everyone was under 18, so the term "victim" is a lot more complicated when talking about legal adults consenting to things.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Very very disturbing how quick you are to say legally consenting adults when we're talking about known sex traffickers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] M137@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

they're*

It's really not hard to get right.

[–] amorangi@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 month ago

Your wrong they're.

[–] remotedev@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

English may not be their first language. You don't have to be a dick when correcting someone over something so inconsequential.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Who the fuck says they're not victims? Thousands of adults are victims of sex trafficking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RainbowHedgehog@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago

I still want an investigation.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 month ago (2 children)

affair with 2 Russian women

Seriously, how long has Russia been playing this "let's get the world's rich and powerful in places where we can blackmail the shit out of them"?

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago

Honeypots are not just Russian. A great many countries and organized crime use this and a wide range of dirty tricks.

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Probably as long as Mossad and the CIA.

The economic depression in Eastern Europe during the 90s created a lot of desperate people and vulnerable children that monsters like Epstein could prey upon. That’s why many victims of his trafficking operation were Eastern European.

Just because Gates is claiming that he slept with two supposedly adult Russian women doesn’t mean they were part of a Russian honeypot. Considering these admissions come on the back of the Epstein files release, I’m more inclined to believe it’s a limited hangout intended to soften the blowback from some of the sick shit Bill was alleged to have done with his friend, a known pedophile and child trafficker.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 42 points 1 month ago

Ok Bill, here's what you do:

  1. take 2% of your net worth (1% for each "affair")
  2. give it to a charity you funded
  3. make this charity buy Microsoft products
  4. brag on TV how generous you are

That's it. Legacy saved.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

“Women.”

Melinda didn’t divorce him because he cheated. That’s par for the billionaire course.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 33 points 1 month ago

There's more. Keep digging.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Who among us hasn't tried to secretly slip their spouse some illegally obtained antibiotics so that they don't discover you gave them an STD you caught while cheating on them at the home of your pedophile sex trafficking Mossad blackmailer buddy, in an attempt to stop them getting some of your billions of dollars in a divorce? I mean come on, is that really so bad?

[–] Tm12@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If he is introducing unknown trojans to Melinda, how can we trust Microsoft Windows 12 Copilot ShittyOS-1?

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

No, no, Trojans would have helped prevent the STIs

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Yeah no this doesn't go away with a half-assed apology to the wrong people. If he wants absolution he knows what he has to do

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nothing illicit? He thinks random Russian women want to have an affair with a married man for innocent personal reasons?

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not saying hes telling the truth, but I think being a billionaire attracts women on its own

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

My favorite opener for a while was “would you let bill gates have sex with you whenever he chose, for a full year, for a billion dollars?” It’s a question that got people going.

I knew I could respect anyone who replied affirmatively or questioned why I decided to start the conversation that way. These were reasonable folks who held an understanding of the vastness of a billion dollars, or saw how unsettling I or my question were.

The rare few were revolted by the premise. Either replying homophobically or in disgust at gates himself. These people were usually either not too bright or trying to put on a facade, in one respect or another.

Which is to say, discarding the idea of gaining a large sum of money is just not something that most reasonable people do. And many people view him less as a person and more as a portal to his treasury, until they’re forced to think about him. I agree with you

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I would probably do it. Bill Gates is probably not willing to do it that often. I'm probably not his type, and the logistics of him showing up to whenever I am make it even less likely. I'm thinking maybe once or twice in a year, and a billion dollars is a lot of money.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

That’s where I settled as well. “Change the world” level money for, at most, a few hundred hours of work. Probably closer to a dozen, if that. You’d be a fool to pass it up

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Sure, but the fact that Epstein was so involved as to be his go to person to find ways to administer the std drugs to his wife is so fucking weird.

Were they just besties with utmost confidence due to their shared love for philanthropy? Or the known human trafficker facilitated or even arranged the affair?

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Strange he's apologizing for the women he cheated with but not the crotch rot.

Even if the claim of an STD is the single untruth in a sea of other now-admitted truths relating to his serial adulteries, just the fact that he was that careless should not be going without comment.

She's well out of that marriage.

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Panic behavior. This doesn't fly anymore

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

The parasite class might think this is enough for a performative closure but the vines are burning.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago
[–] rogsson@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago

Treason investigation on top of pedo investigation! Oh wait, this is the US. Land of the corrupt, home of the pedos. Nothing will happen. 

[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago
[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

So this means he's donating all his money directly to people suffering financial insecurity, along with education on how to not be immediately taken advantage of by unscrupulous scammers, right? That could be the only possible way this wankstain could earn any amount of actual respect from the rest of society.

[–] Pistcow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: next ›