this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
449 points (100.0% liked)

politics

28625 readers
2965 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

At this point the US president exists to take the blame for the will of Israel

[–] oozy7@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

CIA and Mossad’s got a plane. To kill more children like they did to that girls elementary school a while ago

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

“Massive” war launched by a man with no future.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 3 hours ago

I think his plan is to die and be remembered as the guy that started the war with Iran.

He's just gonna give that mess to his successor, and he's fine with that.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 3 hours ago

Wow. Umm, was that an opinion piece?

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 89 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

On the contrary, the plan is to distract us from the Epstein files.

[–] Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago

We should call it the Epstein war just to prevent this.

[–] PodPerson@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I think the plan is “do whatever it takes to remain in power and escape consequences for all of the heinous things that he’s done”. I firmly believe that he couldn’t care less about any real issues, since he has no ability to think critically about them or empathize with the people they affect.

[–] BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca 1 points 55 minutes ago

Yeah honestly I'm gonna go further, holy fuck y'all shut the fuck up about Epstein already! They don't care! Of course Trump is a pedophile and he should be in jail forever but I cannot imagine there is a single person on the planet who doesn't already know about the connection. If they're stupid enough to still be calling it fake news, they're not gonna care about the 8,000,000th fed thread talking about it!

I should not have to think about this worthless pedo so often. Fuckface died, he's not the problem anymore, call Trump a pedo and if someone asks why, please explain, but also please please please understand that Iran has absolutely fucking nothing to do with Epstein! Trump needs to manufacture as many emergencies as quickly as possible (without boiling the pot) so he can get away with declaring some sort of state of emergency where he gets to control the election. There may be more to it than that, but that IS the big idea, and it's what we need to deal with, and it's what no one seems to be talking about.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 21 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If this is a plan to distract from the Epstein files I would consider that a successful plan because what is happening is fucking insane. This distraction would literally be hiding child rapists by killing children.

[–] blah3166@piefed.social 13 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

this needs to be how this is communicated: "Trump starts war to hide child rape"

[–] Kage520@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

"Trump kills children to hide trafficking and raping children."

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

Exactly, no one said it was a good plan

[–] tartarin@reddthat.com 12 points 6 hours ago
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 34 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I challenge Lemmy users and everyone else, everywhere else I post, to please, please open up conversation with your maga uncle or neo-liberal parents.

Do not be dumb and try to start an argument, don't accuse, don't talk about identity or race or gender or any other issue they're already distracted with. Just ask if they think this is going to lower their groceries costs, their medical care, ask if they wanted a war with a country they can't point to on a map (don't say that) when they supported this administration, and if that's going to guarantee their social security and investments. Ask if it's "great again" yet.

Just ask. Just make them work the question and answer out in their head, that's your ONLY job, just plant the seed of asking how to connect these ideas, it doesn't even matter if they get mad at you for asking, your job is to make them figure out ways to make this work in their head.

Individually, you can't usually reach these people, but if enough of us do this all at once, we can start looking at it sociologically, like fluids, like percentages. We can still turn this around broadly, and Trump starting a war his own political-capital base doesn't want is how we get there so we can actually use this.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Yep, and wars ain't free.

Take a quick look through these reports from this month alone and then add sooner-than-expected loss of Medicare and Social Security to your arguments.

"Well, Granddad, did you know that the money for all these military actions at home and abroad are depleting your Social Security and Medicare funds far more rapidly than ever before, and that one of the major trusts funding your Social Security is expected to dry up entirely in 2032, only six years from now, because of the way Trump and his Congress is spending your cash?"

I mean, use your own wording, and your strategy of just asking the question is a great, non-threatening way to approach it. But add the detail about how soon the losses are coming now if you can, because this alone might rouse them from their stupor: NOTHING gets the Silent Generation and older Boomers up and onto their walkers faster than threats to SS and Medicare.


Medicare
Feb 23, 2026: In less than a year, Trump erased 12 years of solvency for the trust fund that pays for Medicare Part A -- Fortune.com

Direct link to CBO report on the HI trust fund that backs Medicare:
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/62165


Social Security
February 27, 2026: Social Security faces earlier depletion date, report finds -- USA Today

Direct link to the CBO report on the SS trust funds:
https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/2026-02/51309-2026-02-trustfund.pdf

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

I feel strongly that one reason a lot of people don't bother to actually grab sources, is because somewhere inside we know the reality is even worse than our knowledge.

Anyway, thank you, those are great and I appreciate the support on this message, we really can start the pendulum push the other direction, and this is the fulcrum that gets us there.

[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 8 points 7 hours ago

I definitely agree with asking questions first. I've tried to open by explaining how I see things in an effort to get folks to open up and share how they see them, and people are so used to that being an attempt to tell them to think something different they can kinda shut down and get defensive even just from that

Try to get them talking and engage with them sincerely. If we want to fix the problems we have to do the work to build a bigger coalition

[–] pigeonofparadise@lemmy.org 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

If you are in the US or Israeli military, you are a baby killing piece of shit, and you should be shunned by your neighbors. Fuck veterans. Take their rights.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Idk I knew an Israeli in the military who literally just played an instrument in the band.

I guess its more noble to go to prison, but literally some folks in IDF are not murdering babies nor helping.

[–] pigeonofparadise@lemmy.org 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

If you clean floors in the military you are literally a member of the baby killers. People have choices. I guess it’s just more convenient to kill babies and pretend they’re innocent. Running their mouth about freedom or some nonsense.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

So you would argue the only ethical choice is to go to prison?

[–] pigeonofparadise@lemmy.org 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Why would they go to prison?

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Israel has forced conscription. If you refuse to go to the military (iirc when you turn 18), they throw you in prison

[–] pigeonofparadise@lemmy.org 3 points 2 hours ago

I think they should go to prison, or defect, or flee, or anything but kill people in the name of a fucking government.

[–] rottenmummy@lemmy.ml 35 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

Yo! Isn't he the peace president?

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 42 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Everything this asshole says is a lie

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 17 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Only when he's wearing the FIFA Peace medal

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago (6 children)

That thing doesn’t mean what it used to.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Archer@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, people in pieces

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

FIFA peace committee in shambles. Crying into wads of money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

There are a ton of angles and takes on this. I'm not here to proclaim that any of them are particularly wrong or right -- I'm not a fortune teller and I don't see the future. Having said that, this headline sort of feeds into my personal take on this. This was performed by an incompetent administration. It's easy to tear shit down. It's much harder to build good, strong things. The ramifications of these, and other recent actions, are basically a giant FUCK YOU to the next administration. And I'm sure they're at least half expecting the next administration to be Democrats. That's part of why they're doing this. Create an insurmountable problem, that no matter how well it's handled by the next leaders, is sure to be a political bombshell. And obviously, the fact that it's a news cycle distraction from the Trump-Epstein files and the shitty economy pretty much meant this was bound to happen at some point. Not to mention the fact that if this becomes a bit of a slow boil, then it also becomes a convenient excuse to cancel elections. Hope I'm wrong, of course, especially on that last point, but it's all too predictable.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 hours ago

Brother they just want money.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

A republican man. Mother Jones. How did you fuck that up?

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I hope they need a draft, and I hope they're tone deaf enough to draft white red state kids.

[–] deceiver@infosec.pub 1 points 4 hours ago

zero chance of this happening

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 22 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

🎶 I've been through the desert
with a man with no plan

La, la, la, la, la, la 🎶

[–] HerrVorragend@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Like the holy, esteemed FIFA Peace Price means nothing!!

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

I just can't even

[–] Numinous_Ylem@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

This is going to spiral out of control. The whole Middle East is going to suffer from this. How is Russia going to react? What are the domestic repercussions going to be during an election year?

No love for the Ayatollah's regime but this is a disaster. This admin has such limited forethought they will make the Bush admin look like geniuses in retrospect

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

This admin has such limited forethought they will make the Bush admin look like geniuses in retrospect

Speaking of which . . . (for the younger ones among us who might not remember what a shitshow it was)

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

All the average American cares about is, yay war. This could precipitate a red wave.

[–] MartianHills@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Definitely. From what I've read, the CIA and military brass advised against this move because someone more aligned with the IRGC could be installed. Who knows what that will look like, but the Khamenei government was offering to honor the 2015 nuclear agreement. Next regime probably won't be so cooperative.

[–] Numinous_Ylem@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Also wondering how this will change the plans and behavior of other big global players like China and India in the longer term. Preamble to WW3 or just a new era of heightened millitarism worldwide?

[–] Tm12@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

Anyone checked on Taiwan?

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

How is Russia going to react?

Long term, no idea. But Putin thrives on creating chaos, and much of his international strategy involves taking stable democracies and doing everything in his power to destabilize them. Just today a report came out in regard to likely Russian interference in Denmark's upcoming elections, but check out the sub-header:

US threats to seize Greenland have created ‘new international fault lines’ that can be used to spread disinformation, Danish intelligence agencies say

Putin did it in the UK with Brexit, he's done it (and is still doing it) here in the US, and now he's taking it further. Don't think for two seconds that Putin is threatened by this at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›