this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
488 points (100.0% liked)

News

36439 readers
2473 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump threatened on Sunday to withhold his signature from all bills until Congress passes a GOP-led voting bill that implements voter restrictions ahead of the November midterms.

“I, as President, will not sign other Bills until this is passed, AND NOT THE WATERED DOWN VERSION – GO FOR THE GOLD: MUST SHOW VOTER I.D. & PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP: NO MAIL-IN BALLOTS EXCEPT FOR MILITARY – ILLNESS, DISABILITY, TRAVEL,” Trump posted on his social media platform, Truth Social.

The bill, called the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, or SAVE America Act, requires individuals to show citizenship documents to register to vote and strict forms of photo ID to cast a ballot. If passed, the legislation would also administer criminal penalties for election officials who register anyone lacking the required documents.

As my colleague Ari Berman wrote in February, the bill would potentially block tens of millions of Americans from voting. Nine percent of American citizens, or approximately 21 million people, don’t have ready access to citizenship documents. The bill may impact millions of US citizens in other ways: tens of millions of women who took their partner’s last name, for example, may not have a birth certificate that matches their legal name could find it more difficult to register.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tover153@lemmy.world 3 points 50 minutes ago

The SAVE act as currently written has a religious exemption, boy do I have a church for you: The Church of Unconsented Likeness. Take the pledge today! https://substack.com/@tover153/p-188528157

[–] borQue@lemmy.zip 15 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

I need that full release.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 58 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

"If conservatives become convinced that they can not win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject democracy."

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 14 minutes ago

That's been their behavior continuously since the country's founding. This is nothing new.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 19 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 37 minutes ago (1 children)

I've been trying to float the idea of voters showing up to the polls armed. Everyone who has a firearm, carry it to vote. Not in a threatening manner, no waving them around, just... Everyone who has one is armed.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 minutes ago

Polling stations are often in schools, and in my state it's illegal to be armed on school grounds.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 36 points 10 hours ago

Schumer's gonna pass the SAVE act so he can pass Iran War funding, isn't he?

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Bitch I’ve been saying this would happen for a fucking decade

[–] lonefighter@sh.itjust.works 96 points 13 hours ago (10 children)

For people who might not be in the US and don't understand why this is a bad idea in the US and proportionately hurts poor people, proof of citizenship is usually a passport. A passport costs $130. You need supporting documents like your birth certificate, SSN, and a drivers license/state ID to get it. For your first passport you usually have to make an appointment to go somewhere authorized like a library, post office, or courthouse to apply, and then they send the application off and it can take weeks to months to get back, depending how backed up the processing agency is (and I'm sure there will be artificial delays during voting years if this passes). Also, they are passing laws limiting where you can go to apply, so now libraries and the post office are losing the ability to process passport applications, so people will have to go to the county courthouse, which could be a long drive from where they live, especially if you live in a rural area. For people who don't drive, or only have one car that is shared with another working adult, or use public transportation that has a limited range (or just doesn't exist in most of the US), or are disabled and can't travel far, this can be a huge problem.

Also, all these places are only open during normal business hours, so you probably have to take time off work to go apply. Federal minimum wage is only $7.25/hr while the living wage is actually much higher (living wage for 1 adult living alone in a 1 bedroom apartment where I live was considered almost $23/hr in 2024), and if someone is making minimum wage or close to it they almost certainly aren't getting paid time off, so now they have to come up with $130 for the fee and lose time off work.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 37 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Here's the real problem: this law would require voters to identify themselves using a photo ID, and it has to be a specific kind of updated ID. Americans have been pushed over the last few years to convert their Driver's License to a "Real ID," which is a Divers License that has been verified with other documents, like a birth certificate or a passport.

If you are man, it is easy because presumably, you have had the same name since birth, so your Real ID Drivers License only requires your birth certificate.

But if you are a woman, and you are married, you probably changed your name to your husband's, so you need a marriage certificate to prove your name change. If you have been married and divorced, you may have to prove THAT name change with a birth certificate AND a marriage certificate AND divorce papers from the first marriage, then a marriage certificate from your second marriage. It can get complicated.

Then there is my wife's problem. As a man, I had no problem getting a Real ID, but my wife needed our marriage certificate. We were married in a Caribbean island over 30 years ago, and the marriage certificate has gone missing long ago. We have been requesting a replacement for over a decade, and have not been able to get one. It can't be done online, it has to be by mail. It is not too expensive, only about $10, but it's usually rejected for the wrong money. They always claim (when we hear any explanation at all) that we have sent the wrong form of payment, which they then keep. We've sent money orders, checks, cash, etc., and probably spent over $100, and still nothing.

So my wife can't get a Real ID because the country we got married in won't cooperate. I suspect our marriage license is lost, and they can't supply a copy. In any case, until we can get this straightened out, my wife has no valid ID, and can't vote under Trump's new law, and if she can't vote for this reason, there are many others on the same situation.

[–] eletes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 48 minutes ago (1 children)

Could you get remarried at the courthouse? Or is that fraud?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 24 minutes ago

We've considered that, but also the fraud angle. Does that mean that things like our mortgage would technically be bank fraud? It's not really an issue, unless the govt decides they don't like my politics, and need an excuse to incarcerate me. My wife is considering just paying for a legal name change in our state. That doesn't imply anything is wrong with the legality of the marriage, she's just making it legal for ID purposes.

[–] dazzlingclitgame@lemmy.world 21 points 11 hours ago

Not all Real ID’s prove citizenship either. It varies state by state.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 48 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Also not that it matters anymore but the Supreme Court already ruled it unconstitutional a long time ago as it's a form of poll tax. Remember when Supreme Court decisions weren't just "whatever Trump wants today" and actually were based on the constitution? Pepperidge Farms remembers.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 5 points 7 hours ago

The current court regularly votes down Trump, tariffs are the most recent example.

The issue is the court is full of conservative assholes who care more about their feelings more than the law.

Don't get me wrong this is still a Trump caused problem, he appointed most of the new conservatives, but they still don't rubber stamp everything he does.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

and if someone is making minimum wage or close to it they almost certainly aren’t getting paid time off, so now they have to come up with $130 for the fee and lose time off work.

A passport card is only $30 (plus the $10 or so dollars for the required photo), but everything else in your post is spot on.

[–] lonefighter@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I always forget you can get just the card without the passport.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Even better, you can have the card expire off-cycle from the book. Since both last 10 years, if you renew one at the 5 year mark, it means you'll always have an active document that can get you to Canada or Mexico even while the other is in the renewal cycle.

I recently learned this after renewing both at the same time missing my opportunity. I'll renew the card early in 5 years or so to get this off-cycle expiry benefit.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 9 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

It's curious why they would want to implement this because although it affects poor people, it would probably also disproportionately affect poor Republicans.

Many voters in states like Mississippi/Arkansas do not have passports because they are both poor and have no intention to travel internationally so don't bother with passports.

[–] MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

it would probably also disproportionately affect poor Republicans

If MAGA thought that it would be a disadvantage to their voter base, they would not be pushing for it.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 26 points 12 hours ago

Because you won’t see it enforced in Mississippi or Arkansas, at least for white republicans. It will be selectively enforced to disenfranchise as needed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 17 points 10 hours ago

woohoo. congess can't pass anymore bullshit laws.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 58 points 16 hours ago

Because more and more people hate his guts with the fury of a thousand women scorned.

And for good reason.

[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 16 points 13 hours ago

...our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down.

-- Paul Weyrich, 1980

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Every time mail in ballots is brought up I mention that Florida has a successful mail in ballot system and they’ve been Republican for well over two decades.

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 12 hours ago

Trump uses mail in voting in Florida.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

they’ve been Republican for well over two decades.

That's not entirely true. At least when it comes to presidential elections, Florida has been a swing state for the last two decades. They went for Obama in 2008 and 2012.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I was talking about governor. If there was anything wrong with mail in voting in florida, you could bet your ass it would have been illegal by now. But there’s nothing wrong with it so all the republicans in Florida leave it as it is.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 16 points 14 hours ago

... I'm tired

[–] orlyowl@piefed.ca 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I've got a lot of worry about how much time he still has to get this passed, and about the viability of the midterms in general. I'm very worried he finds a way to suspend them, or actually gets this bill passed. (Or both)

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

He will get this passed, or do it with some sort of executive order. Most left leaning states will ignore these things as they constitutionally have no power. And trump will use that at a reason to invalidate those states's votes entirely. This will cause violent protests. Trump will bring in the military and declare marshal law. We will then have a dictatorship with trump and his sons as dictators for generations.

[–] orlyowl@piefed.ca 2 points 8 hours ago

I wish I thought you were being ridiculous.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 11 hours ago

Oh, gee, he won't sign anymore illegal, unconstitutional legislation? Oooh, don't hurt me.

load more comments
view more: next ›