this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
263 points (98.9% liked)

News

36534 readers
2143 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People working for the US government do you really want to die fighting for a pedophile?

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago

I think the answer has been a resounding "hell the fuck yes".

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"...during Operation Epic Fury..."
I've not heard of this one, is this going on at the same time as Operation Epstein Distraction?

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Operaron "fuck kids but in a different way and also brown"

Wouldn't surprise me if it actually was shot down and the US regime is just lying again to avoid the embarrassment.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"The incident occurred in friendly airspace during Operation Epic Fury, and rescue efforts are ongoing," a release from US Central Command said, using the operation name the Pentagon has given to US operations against Iran. "Two aircraft were involved in the incident. One of the aircraft went down in western Iraq, and the second landed safely. This was not due to hostile fire or friendly fire."

Sounds like a collision during refueling.

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The second aircraft that landed safely was also a KC-135, the official said.

Weird.

[–] GreenCrunch@piefed.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It is possible for one tanker to refuel another I think, or multiple tankers could have been flying in formation.

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Fuelception

[–] MartianHills@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

A few of these 135's can receive fuel midair and judging from the damage to the Beale 135 that landed, most likely a collision while refueling.

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 50 points 2 days ago (4 children)

This was not due to hostile fire or friendly fire

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 35 points 2 days ago (5 children)
[–] lemmyng@piefed.ca 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, that’s not very typical, I’d like to make that point.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Would you call this tanker safe?

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I was thinking more about the other ones.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The ones the front doesn't fall off.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Some of them are built so the front doesn't fall off

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

The loadmaster forgot to properly strap the fuel in.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 33 points 2 days ago

So it's a skill issue?

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

It apparently was an incident between two kc-135, so maybe they just got a little too rowdy XD

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How much of our money wasted on this? I want the news channels to have a running tally i can see going up as it slowly wipes out any benefits that directly help taxpayers.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I mean, if you don't support the war, then all dollars spent in its effort are wasted. Truth be told it'd be a hard number to tally.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

No clue how they came up with the number or how true it is but i saw its in the 30 millions a day area. So 1 billion a month.

[–] markko@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Post appears to be gone.

[–] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Stop lying guys it's a lot more humiliating that your planes are falling by themselves. Next you are going to say that the soldiers you sent to Iran are self immolating.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 2 days ago

Just another ~~russian~~ american smoking accident....

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I mean, I wouldn't say it's good. You had 6 crewmen die for nothing. For a pedophiles war. If this moves us to pulling out of this shit war, then yes....good news. But I don't see that happening. Not with our government owned by Isreal

hard to have empathy for imperialists aggressors, they did sign up to help murder brown people on the other side of the world.

Not to show off how smart and cool I am, but I personally avoid being killed in US wars of aggression by not joining the US military.

even if you bring up that it's the only way to get healthcare and education in the US, bullshit. you're still signing up to murder people in the name of the state. you are less deserving of education and healthcare than everyone else.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

The most recent statement said 2 of the 6 crew survived

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

it's essentially a modified 707, "Massive" is a bit hyperbolic. Not much larger than a 737 Max 9.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pretty big for a military aircraft tho? Aren't most of them smaller?

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If you are talking about fighters and small transport, yes, but this is a specialized transport. The C5 galaxy is nearly double the length, lifts over THREE times the weight. You have the Amazing Antonov 225 (one bombed by Russia, two partially built), The C5 Galaxy, the C17 Globemaster, the Antonov 124, The airbus A400...

In the commercial space you have many more planes larger than the KC135

Here is a KC135 refuelling a C5, to give you a sense of perspective.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Awesome! Thanks for the info!

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

Sure, like the planes that “fell” off USS Harry Truman, like the three planes shot down by Kuwaiti Red Baron…

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Yea but its a really old one from when they weren't crap.

So it missed Iran completely?

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Did two planes collide while refueling? I wonder how many people died...

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Four, as of last update

The other plane was another kc-135, so possibly

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

As the fighting force is replaced by this next generation....I suspect the systemic lack of cognative ability I keep seeing discussed will have impacts.

Also...no one has fought to defend US freedom since wwii.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›