IMHO this belongs in c/bloomer
this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
100 points (100.0% liked)
news
24665 readers
705 users here now
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
that would feel a bit off considering the reason they've burned through so many is because they killed a bunch of people and destroyed their homes
Yeah, maybe otherwise if it just referred to interceptors.
I guess it's not years worth if it got burned thru in a few days but I'm no math genius.
Could mean years of production
it's usually production, occasionally it's "we think we'll use an average of six of these a year"
accounting error
the logistic software used dog years 
Dogs don't age that fast, but maybe Americans do.
Haha life comes at you fast.
there are weeks where decades happen etc etc
Years of munitions*
*Statement valid only if occupying an already razed country and shooting people for sport, not fighting an actual military
The military industrial complex is so used to insane levels of graft now that this makes total sense to me. If it costs $10.000 to ship a hammer to a base in Iraq, I don't even want to imagine the margins munitions manufacturers are making on things.
Which then of course means they can make fewer bombs, since the armed forces can't afford them and have stocks of ammo anyway and the end result of it is that Iran can make a drone bomb for 10K while intercepting it costs potentially millions of dollars.
That's the major irony to the USA's world historically high military spending. It's sort of like a reverse Jevons paradox: there has been so much money pouring into the MIC, and at such an increasing rate, that the entire industry re-oriented towards optimizing graft. So now every new contract is optimized for Maximum cost and Minimum deliverables. And you do really want to minimize the deliverables - after all, every dollar you're spending on an actual piece of military equipment is a dollar not going into someone's pocket. And that's lead to the rapid de-industrialization of the MIC, focused on delivering small quantities of uber complex uber technological wunderwaffe (or more blatantly, just super expensive konventionelle Waffen). When an actual war breaks out, you have counter-intuitive situations like Russia out-producing all of NATO because they prioritized and planned for how to ramp up industrial output.
In fact, I'd argue there's a systemic pressure to produce expensive weapons in artisanal batches. The only thing companies care about is maximizing profits. Producing cheap and reliable weapons in large volumes means low margins, needing warehouses to store them, hiring lots of workers for assembly lines, building factories, etc. It's much better to build stuff like F35s that take a long time to design, then you produce a handful of them, and charge a huge maintenance contract for decades to come.
Oh yes, absolutely. The money is in moon shot projects that might not even bear any fruit at all. Like researching how to railgun when basic physics tells you those things break after 5 uses or indeed the clusterfuck that is the F35. I think the B2 stealth bomber was the first project of this kind and the corporations learned very well from it.
But think of all the sweet sweet margins
Probably 10 different middlemen each collecting their 20% cut. Lots of beautiful boats
All doing their part to end this sham of an empire sooner, yes.