Asklemmy

1. Jury nullification. That's a start. Dont vote guilty on certain crimes. You know what Im saying.
2. Small acts of resistance. Just stop fully cooperating with the 1%. Spit in their soup.
3. Large acts of resistance ...

Fortunately you won't have to wait long. Either we get a revolution in the next 20 years or every non-1%er dies.

Start by getting rid of your own debt, cutting down on purchases to the bare minimum, and saving up enough cash that losing work won't affect you. Then start helping others do the same.

If no one is buying anything, there's no government control.

It would require several simultaneous grass roots movements globally rising up, or the complete collapse of the global economy.

We'd need to educate enough people world wide on effective tactics and preparation for a global general strike (info on how to do that here), and coordinate a single date for it to begin globally, which would essentially shut down the world economy.

With enough education on how to implement decentralized horizontal societies beforehand, we could effectively cast off capitalism without falling into the authoritarian pitfalls of the past, much like Catalonia was able to do in the 1930's..

The end result of that would be the effective elimination of poverty, homelessness, hunger, and resource scarcity after implementing a gift-economy, not unlike it's portrayed in The Dispossessed. This would also mean all of us would only need to work about 2 to 3 months out of the year to maintain the base needs of everyone, with the rest of the year being free time to do with as you please. The lack of profit motive would also set us up to stop the progression of climate change before it destroys humanity and most other life on earth.

We can dance if we want to!

Revolutions are context dependent. You can't have a global revolution because it covers too many contexts. Global revolutions that do happen will be based on the contemporaneous development of local revolutions, that is to say a global revolution is a descriptive bottom up phenomenon, not a top down one.

You focus on your context. You figure out what that means. You do your part. Let other people do their part. You may find yourself as part of a global phenomenon, you may not.

Also, think about what a revolution is. It's a replacement of a power structure. Globally, you could have a revolution against the UN, maybe. WTO? IMF? But you would have to get through your local power structure first.

So you focus on replacing the power structure in your context. Others focus on replacing the power structure in their context. And that's how it goes.

Violence. You want a revolution, you're gonna have to kill some people.

To coordinate that many people, you would need either:

• a political party that would coordinate global actions via some sort of hierarchy
• a disaster of some kind that affected enough of the population that the entire world could be convinced to act all at once, or at least in quick succession, but still didn’t take out all of our communication structures so decentralized communication would still be possible.

We saw how Covid worked out so I think the likelihood of everyone not only acting at once, but also in unison, because of a disaster is quite small without a party to coordinate. There need to be constraints on behavior with levers of power to pull and enforce those constraints in order to get literally billions of people to do the same thing at the same time. I don’t see a way around it.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1849/01/01.htm

England seems to be the rock which breaks the revolutionary waves, the country where the new society is stifled before it is born. England dominates the world market. Any upheaval in economic relations in any country of the European continent, in the whole European continent without England, is a storm in a teacup. Industrial and commercial relations within each nation are governed by its intercourse with other nations, and depend on its relations with the world market. But the world market is dominated by England and England is dominated by the bourgeoisie.

Thus, the liberation of Europe, whether brought about by the struggle of the oppressed nationalities for their independence or by overthrowing feudal absolutism, depends on the successful uprising of the French working class. Every social upheaval in France, however, is bound to be thwarted by the English bourgeoisie, by Great Britain’s industrial and commercial domination of the world. Every partial social reform in France or on the European continent as a whole, if designed to be lasting, is merely a pious wish. Only a world war can break old England, as only this can provide the Chartists, the party of the organized English workers, with the conditions for a successful rising against their powerful oppressors. Only when the Chartists head the English government will the social revolution pass from the sphere of utopia to that of reality.

For england read "the imperial hegemon", for france read "the link in the imperialist chain that breaks"

Revolutionary dictatorship gotta press the reactionary hegemon hard and fight a world war against them. Otherwise there will be no global revolution and no communism, just endless counterrevolutions forever

Start by finding a general consensus over where we should go, the rest will follow.

Wish I knew, I've given it more thought than I'd admit irl.

Start small: make your bed, brush your teeth, do your homework every day.

https://youtu.be/XjBOSAk5BDk - How We Gonna Make The Black Nation Rise? ✧ Brother 'D' w/ Collective Effort

You would need to enlighten enough people to wake them up without making then feel uncomfortable they've been believing a lie. Nobody likes to feel foolish for what they've believed in.

But fighting for a common cause helps to unite people by putting aside their differences.

Also, REALLY good start is get people OFF of major tech. Hurt their profits by reducing the content they profit off of (selling user data), which in turn reduces ad revenue too. Then they simultaneously they can't afford to buy out politicians who make favorable policies for big tech and social media.

The more we can reduce big tech, the less all the data brokers can profit from since a major data contributor vanishes. Eventually, we gain the proper people in office who are pro people and not technology, and eventually the people win.

Other battles are big pharma and the auto industry as both also utilize data brokers. The only way that gets fixed falls back to the right people in leadership roles.

Leave us out of it, please. Canada

Bringing attention to the epstein class and calling the owning class the epstein class seems to be helping the normies understand. Though i do think we are beyond the time for talk, it is helping

Have you got any ideas OP?

Nature says: IF you want the current regime ( in any ecology! ) displaced,

THEN displace it!

Don't like Facebook's monopoly? Displace it.

Don't like political-parties' railroading our world into ideological cuckery?

Displace it!

Etc.

For effectiveness, it'd require leaders, which the anarchists prohibit from their world, so they're not going to help displace the organized-idiocy.

Communist & fascist imperialism will do EVERYTHING IT CAN to break any threat to their eventual-totalitarian-world-dominion.

Concentration-of-wealth-archy/oligarchy won't tolerate any such thing, either.

& worst is the rude fact that as people's contexts change, THEY change, so it has to be lead by people who've earned self-conquering, who aren't malleable in principles or integrity, no matter how much force they are plied with, or how relentlessly they are plied with that force.

The people who felt class-elevated to be hobnobbing with Epstein kept their mouths shut when they shouldn't have, simply because they'd be knocked lower down the social-status-hierarchy if they broke-ranks, & that social-pressure was sufficient to protect the entire Epstein-Class for decades.

That mechanism is in all of us.

It can be broken, through years of relentless pushing oneself into facing-karma, & breaking one's unconscious-mind's ignorance-dominion on one's life.

Just identifying some of the key forces/factors that have to be dealt-with, in order for global-grass-roots-revolution to work, among the populations who are educated well/correctly enough to value critical-thinking.

In all the regions where education did what Leninism & Fox do, prevent that ( remember how the Republicans eradicated critical-thinking from all their territory after Trump won his 2nd term? ) .. thos regions are no-longer recoverable, in WW3's next 6-decades.

One has to accept that only a fraction of humankind will fight-off ideology-displacing-reason, & that saving the rest, thanks to education, isn't possible.

Basic principle that Sunzi/Sun Tzu/Master Sun identified, 2.5 millenia ago: IF one is outnumbered, either defend, if one is strong, or evade, if one is weak.

Critical-reasoning is, globally, weak.

We either deal-with-that XOR we hand victory to the ideologues.

_ /\ _

Well current "world order" arose from the fact that information technology gave everyone equal voice. Sounds wonderful at first, but turns out society has limited input bandwidth and intellectual voices were drowned out by nonsensical babble.

Large set of solar flares that fry all electronics? That would cause a lot of suffering for a while, but maybe it would stop humanity from driving of the cliff with a big stupid grin no it's face.

The shortest path to revolution is simply the truth. As all unjust forms of power is undermined by it.