this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
138 points (97.3% liked)

News

36598 readers
2223 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Giving Pledge’s numbers, reported Sunday by the New York Times, trace a steady decline. In its first five years, 113 families signed the Pledge. Then 72 over the next five, 43 in the five after that, and just four in all of 2024. The roster includes Sam Altman, Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan, and Elon Musk — some of the most powerful people in the world, and yet, in Peter Thiel’s words to the Times, it is a club that’s “really run out of energy . . .I don’t know if the branding is outright negative,” Thiel told the outlet, “but it feels way less important for people to join.”

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 74 points 2 days ago

Fuck philanthropy, TAX THEM!

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 9 points 1 day ago

a club that’s “really run out of energy . . .I don’t know if the branding is outright negative,” Thiel told the outlet, “but it feels way less important for people to join.”

That's fine, we'll just take it all, whether you like it or not. If it comes to that, it probably won't be a pleasant experience for you, and you will most certainly wish you had been more generous up front.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 24 points 1 day ago

Philanthropy from the wealthy is already a way for them to whitewash their image and stave off torches and pitchforks. Charity is premised on the idea that the system is fine, but some people just need help sometimes, rather than acknowledging that the system is wrong and needs to be fundamentally changed. So fuck it, let them show their utter lack of real concern for everyone other than themselves to the world, and learn that they’re not superhuman the hard way.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s worth separating the fate of the Pledge from the fate of philanthropy more broadly. Some of the wealthiest people in tech are still giving; they’re just doing it on their own terms, through their own vehicles, toward their own chosen ends. At the start of 2026, Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI) cut about 70 jobs — 8% of its workforce — as part of a move away from education and social justice causes toward its Biohub network, a group of nonprofit, biology-focused research institutes operating across several cities. “Biohub is going to be the main focus of our philanthropy going forward,” Zuckerberg said last November.

They’re just trying to extend their own lifespans

[–] Fusselwurm@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

guys, it still counts as philantropy if i love just myself, right? guys?

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

“Most of the ones I’ve talked to have at least expressed regret about signing it,” Thiel said, calling the Giving Pledge an “Epstein-adjacent, fake Boomer club.”

Pot calling the kettle a pedo.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This article seems to take a freak piece of shit like Thiel at face value, without any mention of just what a crazy figure he is.

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah since he has the vp of the US in his pocket you can't take anything he says as an improvement.

Wonder what living room furniture the vp has due to Thiel. Heh. Yes I know not real but still fun to poke fun at, cause in these times little else is left.

Also not American so can't have any sway with what happens except say what a horrible administration they allow to continue.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

he has the vp of the US in his pocket

On a leash.

[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

People are going to people. While a noble idea, the pledge overlooks the sociopathic and selfish personality traits pretty much required to attain that level of wealth.

ETA: This is why tax policy is a better way to do this. Problem is if just one or two countries have such policies, the wealthy can hide from it. Not a reason not to have the tax policy, though. That’s where foreign policy should come into play.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago

I like how the assumption is that there is honour among billionaires.

The roster includes Sam Altman, Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan, and Elon Musk — some of the most powerful people in the world, and yet, in Peter Thiel’s words to the Times, it is a club that’s “really run out of energy . . .I don’t know if the branding is outright negative,” Thiel told the outlet, “but it feels way less important for people to join.”

I wonder what (or who) else this roster of billionaires all have in common? 🤔

Also: Peter Thiel: Why Monopolies Are a Good Thing

Those seem to be two conflicting ideas... It's almost like this guy has no fucking clue what he's talking about, but people keep listening to him and amplifying his bullshit because he's part of some club that signals anytime he opens his mouth important things are being said...

"I have a law degree from Stanford." & "Academic elites are destroying society."

"My dream was always to be nominated to the supreme court, but they rejected me when I applied for a clerkship." & "I believe traditional government institutions must be toppled."

"I fear regulations of technology will lead to a single one world authoritarian government." & "I plan to use my monopoly to create and control that one world authoritarian government, but it's different because it's a private business and nobody but me and my pedophile friends had any say in it taking control."

Or if you just want it all boiled down into Thiel's greatest hit:."I've come to believe that democracy and freedom are incompatible."

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Do something good or at least unselfish with their money? What were they thinking!

[–] Kalon@feddit.online 4 points 2 days ago

One day altruism won't be voluntary for these f**ks.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

“Some of us actually, as naïve as it sounds, came here to make the world a better place. And we did not succeed. We made some things better, we made some things worse, and in the meantime the libertarians took over, and they do not give a damn about right or wrong. They are here to make money.”

... sounds about right.