this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
111 points (85.4% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8938 readers
121 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Perhaps it should be named "unconventional opinions that I still agree with"? Or perhaps "lol lets see what opinion they post now" (to be fair, the WHY ARE YOU BOOING ME? I'M RIGHT is sort of this)?

People are just upvoting and downvoting what they agree and disagree with, so it basically comes off as a trap to get things to laugh at - which it isn't even good at. Should people not be voting on "yes, this is something that is genuinely unpopular"?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

The voting guidelines are an attempt to encourage actual unpopular opinions to "rise to the top", so to speak, as that is the purpose of the community. Obvious troll (or other rule-violating) posts should be reported rather than just downvoted, but we kind of expected people to embrace the spirit of the community. While many do, there are several problems with this approach:

  1. As others have stated, people just knee-jerk to the downvote button when they see something they disagree with
  2. 80% or more of the people on this platform don't bother to read the rules for any community
  3. Muscle memory
  4. Edit: When a post from here shows up in /all for someone who isn't familiar with the community, we can't really expect them to click into it to look at the voting guidelines prior to voting.

We put out a poll a while back asking if the voting guidelines should be changed, but there was no majority in favor of it, so they remain the same.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I think the real issue is the all feed. For many folks on Lemmy, there are no communities, there are only community tags on an otherwise never-ending stream of flotsam scrolling by on the all feed. This makes it very hard to establish community norms in any case.

[–] nomecks@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 week ago

Downvoted posts should move to the top

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] metakrakalaka@lemmychan.org 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

An entire industry's worth of engagement algorithms.

[–] calmblue75@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It would be good if they do away with votes altogether for this community.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 4 days ago

honestly I would prefer community voting not even be a thing in the federation but communities like this it actually makes sense if you could just have everyone understand how its supposed to be done.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago

I lot of people don't understand how voting is supposed to be done in unpopular opinions

[–] plyth@feddit.org 35 points 1 week ago (3 children)

People don't check the channel when it's in their timeline. They treat it like a regular post and they vote on it like they always do.

This requires some redesign of the way the channel is treated to make it work.

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago

Exactly.

It's the same for other communities also.
Have e.g. seen a lot of unexpected downvotes for legit dull posts on Dull Men's Club.

Would perhaps help if the community name would be displayed more prominently.

On the other hand, the community names sometimes don't mirror the description or content of the community.
So it's complicated...

Perhaps count votes from actual community members seperatly from the rest?

[–] M137@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I've not seen someone use such wrong words to describe part of the website they're on before. "channel" and "timeline"? What?

[–] TheObviousSolution@thebrainbin.org 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Good point, maybe better design could help address it.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

[Unpop] Just require post tags.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

Default sort with most down votes at the top, and let people down vote.

[–] 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.org 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I thought unpopular opinion meant: „I feel a bit alone with my opinion on xyz, is there someone who shares this opinion?“ I think it shouldn’t mean: „Here is my completely unhinged take on xyz that would get me banished from my community if I ever said it out loud“.

So imho it’s expected to stumble unpon people that agree with you.

It should be for „ I think socks in sandals are cute.“ and not „Hitler was a great guy and did nothing wrong.“

[–] TheObviousSolution@thebrainbin.org 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's a nice take, but it feels like someone is heading to a trap to be on the stage for mockery - "WHY ARE YOU BOOING ME? IM RIGHT" . People who want that should find a community specifically related to supporting their beliefs, and usually can.

I think that people who post in Unpopular Opinions do so to get the sense "Ok, here is my opinion, but we can all respect each other even though I have it". Also applies to your examples. Would someone who posted "sandals are cute" not get downvoted if the circlejerk against it wasn't big enough?

If my take on what it should be is right, it's also a litmus test for how accepting the community is - imagine a post "Hitler was a great guy and did nothing wrong.“ except all the comments just basically say "That's unpopular, it is right to be unpopular, and you may be getting caught in bubbles of propaganda that don't allow you to see it because of reasons xyz". You get to correctly identify a Hitler supported, you correctly identify just about the most unpopular opinion you can have, and you also have direct communication to tell off the guy. I suppose that also makes this community a litmus test on Lemmy and how the community is like.

[–] 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is we’re I disagree. There’s absolutely no reason interact at all with someone who says stuff like this. Either they are a troll and shouldn’t be „fed“ or they are serious and should be blocked. There is no reasoning with fascists. There should be things people don’t dare to say because some things are not only morally, but ethically unbearable. And „Hitler was right“ is one of those things.

[–] TheObviousSolution@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Look up Daryl Davis, to put one example.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I thought unpopular opinion meant: „I feel a bit alone with my opinion on xyz, is there someone who shares this opinion?“

That's just "does anyone else . . . ?" type post. A classic unpopular opinion is like "milk in the bowl before cereal is superior".

And the ones that get upvoted are like "that sounds so weotng but youre not hurting anyone so fair play" like the milk before cereal example.

That’s a better definition than mine.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DavidGA@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is an extremely popular opinion.

[–] Speiser0@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I agree, hence I've downvoted.

[–] TheObviousSolution@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you believe it is, totally legit according to the pretext, you guys did your part.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kindnesskills@literature.cafe 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Heres my opinion: Votes doesn't matter, it merely inhibits conversation when we can express your reaction to a post with a click of a button instead of explaining our own thoughts on the matter.

Just post what you want to post and try to avoid looking at the number, or go over to an app or instance that doesn't show votes, or allows you to select your own settings for votes, or only shows upvotes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I see the down voting more often as a method of saying "this is a troll" or "this opinion is unpopular because it is evil/ makes no sense". I've seen plenty of unpopular opinions that have decent ratios while genuinely being unpopular.

I think it's similar to how the right wing views the first amendment in the US. You can say whatever you want that's unpopular. Noone is stopping you. But that doesn't mean that you're entitled to upvotes for being a bigot or troll just because it technically fits the subject of the sub.

[–] r0ertel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Similarly, I've read people encouraging voting as a way to say that the post benefits the conversation. Down vote trolls, posts without adequate backing of ideas or actual dangerous comments and upvote posts that contribute, even if you disagree, then disagree as a reply.

For example, in a post, "a hotdog is a sandwich", upvote a comment that says, "meat & bread = sandwich" then reply, "you are an idiot" (then expect a downvote because your comment doesn't contribute.

If you guys agree with both of these definitions, should you not ask or join a more apt community where it is in the rules instead of where the rules say otherwise? Seems easy to add on.

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People vote on what should gain more visibility, or less. So if your point is well created and somewhat heinous in nature, people down vote as to keep your opinion from spreading. If your opinion is true even if unpopular, I wager it will gain visibility. Even divisive opinions will gain visibility due to discussion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thorry@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago

One of the issues I've seen myself and have downvoted in this community is people just posting dumb shit. They don't actually have that opinion and if they do, they haven't given it any thought. Nothing wrong with having an unpopular opinion if they can actually defend their opinion. But just straight up posting something unreasonable under the guise of it being "unpopular" is downvote worthy.

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago

sorts "all" feed by controversial

Hmm, maybe we didn't need a community for this in the first place?

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Upvotes/downvotes dont matter on this site. Its not like reddit where downvotes limit how much you can comment and upvotes are required to participate in communities.

Its dumb that people cant upvote opinoins they disagree with but it is what it is. Maybe the OP should post a comment saying Agree and a comment saying disagree so only the people who bothered to open the thread can vote.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

They still effect visibility under most post sorting options, lower scored things display lower. Matters in a minor way for scrolling through the subscribed feed.

[–] lath@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

It can get mixed up. People can upvote their agreement with the sentiment that it's unpopular or the agreement with the opinion itself. It makes the arrow system unreliable because you can't be sure they see it as choosing between agreeing with the opinion and agreeing with its unpopularity.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Lemmy is different from Reddit. On Reddit you get pushed content to keep you busy. On Lemmy you just get the most active and new content. So I'm guessing a lot of people just get these posts in their feed without even being subscribed to this community.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I upvoted this not because you are correct but because you care about votes. Least popular thing I can think of. Nice job.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The only unpopular opinions I have seen downvoted to hell (recently at least) have been objective facts that were incorrect. Saying your opinion is [thing that is untrue] should still go into a black hole.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

Do you only do things for imaginary upvotes?

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Upvoting and downvoting are supposed to be relevant to the sub not to ones feelings. But we're human so we like to piss in each other's soups so we vote with our feelings and not our brains. So to speak.

load more comments
view more: next ›