this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
1721 points (99.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

11173 readers
2822 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArrowMax@feddit.org 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them."


Frank Herbert in Dune, 1965.

Relevant as ever

[–] dipcart@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (7 children)

So funny to be like AI can retrieve facts in .3 seconds. First of all, no it can't. Second of all, can't search engines do this? Haven't they been doing this for years? Like AI is slower, less accurate and more wasteful than duckduckgo. Shouldn't all her points have been true years ago?

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

they're sending kids to school to learn things that are already in books! and if they wanted to know them they could just learn them from a book! why even bother to learn from a book when they could learn it from a book?!

[–] Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Throw the book at 'em!

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

forgive her, she's been outsourcing all mental activity for a while.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Boppel@feddit.org 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

she wrote a comment that a bot could have written better

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Who's to say it didn't?

[–] ugandan_airways@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I just looked at that woman’s twitter and it’s an absolute nightmare. AI really makes some stupid people think they are smart.

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or is it just some AI bot trying to promote AI?

[–] ugandan_airways@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Very possible. The whole purpose of the account is to grift. White trash looking woman claiming to have financial freedom due to AI.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Theres a reason American slaves weren't allowed to read or write. Why little girls in Afghanistan aren't allowed to go to school past 3rd grade.

What's going to happen when you can't read agreements or reports. And just have to believe what someone else tells you it says.

?

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Whats worrying is that im already in that situation now with all the 50 page user agreements. Like fuck am I reading that every time.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

You know, I do research and there are rules that the informed-consent documents have to be written at an 8th grade reading level.

No jargon. No technical writing.

Simple and clear. So that when people agree to be in a study, they actually do understand what that involves.

Otherwise they can sue the hell out of you for misleading them.

Why is this also not a requirement for "terms and service"?

They intentionally write it in "legalise" so that the average person cannot understand it.

I think it should have to follow the same rules as informed-consent documents.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

Exactly! Learn those kids stuff ai can't do! Send them to the mines!

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 227 points 2 days ago (6 children)

When they filmed the movie 'Van Helsing' in Prague they needed one hundred couples who knew how to ballroom dance. Everyone thought this was going to be difficult to set up, but it turned out that literally every extra they hired could waltz. Back in Soviet days, the country didn't have a lot of money for sports equipment, but every school had a record player. They taught the kids ballroom dancing for the Physical Education requirement.

[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago (3 children)

We went to dance classes all throughout I think eight grade and learned a few of the classical dances. Waltz, Foxtrott, Cha-Cha, Tango. That's Eastern Germany in the early 2000s.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (11 children)

My middle school in the us made us learn to waltz in gym class. I'm ass at it, but it was fun.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To graduate from my (American) high school, you needed a given number of gym points, and you were given one gym point per day of gym class. But, I learned, you earned one and a half gym points per day of dance class! I figured this was a great scam: I already hated gym class, so I'd get my points out the way faster.

Fast forward a couple of months, and I'm working harder than I ever was in gym class, I'm enjoying myself more, and I'm hanging out with girls in leotards first thing every school day. There was literally no downside.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

AI "retrieves" facts? Not my experience.

I was personally not able to reproduce this https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/52tYaGQgaEPvZaHTb/was-barack-obama-still-serving-as-president-in-december but it should still provide an illustration of what AI's ideas of retrieving facts looks like.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

i recently got access to the paid version of Claude at my job. they wanted us to automate some routine tasks, fine. i had it make something, then asked how i could save it as a skill for future use. it said it doesn't have skills or macros. i said what, yes there are skills right there in the customize section. it came back with the usual "you're right! let me check... oh yes indeed there is such a function. my bad. here's more information from the web: ..."

like... oh my god. imagine if this were an unpaid intern. they would be immediately shot into the atmosphere. but instead we pay for this shit.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, such things can happen... I once asked an LLM a few questions about me (under my real name) that was publicly available on the Internet (i.e. should be in its training data). It answered a simple yes-or-no question wrongly. Then I asked it a followup question, which it answered more correctly, but the answer contradicted that wrong answer and it went "this seems to contradict my previous answer that...".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] VinegarChunks@lemmus.org 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In my experience Microsoft Copilot is wildly inaccurate about facts describing aspects of Microsoft software products like Teams, or even Microsoft Copilot itself.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tristan@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 58 points 1 day ago (10 children)

I never thought this would need saying, but the point of writing essays in school is not the final product.

That essay will almost never be good enough to be relevant or published; no one expects it to be. The goal is to engage with the material, and learn to synthesise and present your ideas logically.

We must grade the process of writing an essay, never the final product; especially not based on how “good” an essay that final product is.

We’ve got to stop and ask ourselves why people don’t have AI complete video games for them, but do so for essays. It’s because in one case, the value is in the process, while in the other, the value is believed to be the result, but it shouldn’t be.

If people understood this, it would make no sense having AI write students’ essays. You can blame people for wanting to take shortcuts, but I believe our society and culture at large play a much bigger role in that trend.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] sundray@lemmus.org 125 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"Don’t let AI write anything for you. Writing is to cognitive health what steps are to physical health"

(via)

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 68 points 2 days ago (3 children)

We can't have people forming their own ideas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Sometimes advances in technology do mean that things that they teach in school are outdated and can probably safely be removed.

I'd say cursive writing is one of those things. Writing in general is important, and obviously kids need to learn how to write upper case and lower case block letters. But, with computers everywhere, a whole secondary set of characters that is designed to be linked together seems useless.

I also do think that schools probably focus too much on memorization. I absolutely hated history in school because that's how it was taught. Memorize the name of these battles and the dates and then regurgitate them for the test. I didn't actually learn anything meaningful. What would have been much more useful and much more interesting would have been to learn more of the backstory. What was going on in the country that led it to go to war. Were they trying to distract from something, or get the people to unite against a common enemy? Were they supremely confident that they could easily win and gain important territory or resources? Were they backed into a corner?

I'd support not memorizing as many things because it's true that you can look them up (of course, AI is not how you should ever look anything up because it might just 'hallucinate'). I think most teachers would agree. But, it's also a lot harder to write and grade a good test when you're not doing names and dates. So, I assume that's another big part of the reason that memorization is the focus.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (7 children)

You know they don't teach typing anymore either. Yeah Ive got 3 nieces and a nephew. None of them can use a keyboard properly. They type with their index fingers.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Kage520@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They took out cursive from the curriculum for a while, but they are supposedly putting it back now. I think they are suggesting the brain learns a little differently with cursive so it's still useful in that manner.

Also I think you'd enjoy the podcast I listen to, American History Tellers. I hated history for the same reasons you describe but this podcast really made me enjoy it. Usually they open a topic with something like "Imagine it's in the late 1800s, and you are opening up shop. Times have been hard since [backstory], but you are getting by okay. You do worry about [current topic], and feel worse when you read today's paper." Even that small little setup kind of ropes you in to feel like it's relatable.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] spitfire@lemmy.world 71 points 2 days ago (5 children)

God forbid they learn how to think, when LLMs can do it (kind of) for them

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] bonenode@piefed.social 101 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 69 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] eth0slash0@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It goes in the square hole.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago

"Hey ChatGPT, was the American Civil War about slavery?" Having that fact stored in your head is inherently different than looking it up. Knowing that America has a history of racism and the south have a history of revisionism is very important. This is why some gullible folks really do believe confederate monuments are just about heritage despite being built in during the civil rights movement. It's not the sort of thing you'd think to "ask AI" at all if you didn't already have some of the groundwork. An education is important.

[–] voidsignal@lemmy.world 64 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (13 children)

sigh... how can one be so dumb? has to be a troll... right? pretty please.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Realistically, schools were designed to provide a trainable workforce that could read well enough to learn new tasks and do enough math to make sure the factory machines were properly maintained.

Many people these days don't read a single book after they get out of school. The AIs are just making things happen faster.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (7 children)

From a broader perspective "school" has been a thing since before Socrates and humanity pendulums between "a broad education is the foundation for a strong populace" and "we need a giant pool of disposable labor".

And the US public education philosophy is similarly inconsistent. At the earliest it was Puritans who wanted everyone to be able to read the Bible for themselves and so pushed for literacy. At times it has been guided specifically by the business economy but it's inaccurate to say that schools were designed to produce factory workers.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Why learn to read and write while there's speech recognition and text-to-speech apps nowadays?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What a braindead take, I seriously hope this idiot doesn't have children of her own

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›