this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
390 points (98.8% liked)

politics

29147 readers
2521 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 20 points 20 hours ago

He also said that “purity tests” within the party have led to more division in the US.

What he's saying is he wants more Conservatives in the Democratic party.

F this guy and his failure of Democratic leadership.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Then looks directly in the mirror unironocally

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

I'll stare directly at the sun, but never in the mirror

It must be exhausting always rooting for the anti-hero

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 17 hours ago

He's not the worst, but he's definitely part of the problem. When he calls for new leadership, he really means give it to him, and he wouldn't be much better than Schmuckie Boy. He'd be just as Zionist, that's for sure.

If Booker becomes president, MAGA will be back in power 4 years later.

[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

If you smelt it you dealt it. Get out and make room for someone who actually gives a fuck

[–] MrsVeggies@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Just another example of Democrats acting like they oppose themselves in order to crush thier opposition.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

So on one hand people here hate the Democrat leadership (with good reason). But now when this guy is speaking out against the Democrat leadership, you criticize them for internal division?

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 3 points 17 hours ago

He's part of that leadership. He's part of the problem. We want real change for working people, he just wants to change who's getting the corporate bribes.

[–] chrislowles@lemmy.zip 3 points 17 hours ago

The call is coming from inside the house

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 295 points 1 day ago (8 children)

He is objectively one of the people who has failed this moment.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 116 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At least he's calling for himself to be replaced.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I can only imagine the thought in his head is:

If I say this first, and loudest, it therefore cannot apply to me, because I called it out.

Fucking terminal shitlib brain; everything is optics, history and context don't exist beyond when I want to A/B test some rhetoric.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 26 points 1 day ago

this left-right divide is killing our country

So you want the nazi-simp vote. Got it.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Motherfucker filibustered for over 24 hours, fasted in preparation to do so, only to undo every fucking word he spewed by voting in Trump's nominees.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It wasn't a filibuster. No legislation was being held up. He just gave a long speech as a performance piece. People keep trying to say he had the longest filibuster, but it literally wasn't one.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

He’s the 2nd most pathetic out of all the Dems besides Schumer. This dude only cares for appearing to do anything, but never actually does anything because he’s a bought centrist.

Damn, that was a good catch. I had misremembered it as well.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 178 points 1 day ago (2 children)

....Does he realize he's talking about himself?

Definitely not.

[–] goferking0 21 points 1 day ago

Me may still think his pointless filibuster will earn him leadership

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 120 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Objectively fucking hilarious.

This man has been responsible for stomping down the voices who seek to replace him. AOC, Mamdani, Ossof, Platner...keep naming them.

He is no different than Schumer. Fuck both of you.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Yeah that was all practice for his upcoming imminent presidential bid.

Don't worry he'll do the same thing to the people that came before him too.

[–] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Golden@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 19 hours ago

Cory Booker is Rand Paul with a D next to his name 

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

Let me guess: he's the solution.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 day ago

Schumer's preference for centrist candidates

That is code for zionist first candidates. His extreme loyalty to Israel is disqualifying.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 63 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep, we all agree, he needs to be replaced or taken out of the leadership position. We will not forget that he and schumer voted to end the shut down we were winning for no reason that I can see.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (8 children)

You're talking about Jeffries, not Booker.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

You're right, Cory. So drop out of your fucking primary and endorse a real leader.

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He is definitely against litmus tests regarding AIPAC.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aaa999@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"'I’ve called for a generational renewal, because this left-right divide is killing our country and our adversaries know it.' He also said that 'purity tests' within the party have led to more division in the US."

yeah this is kind of the opposite issue of what anyone competent would want to address with chuck schumer

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Its also just complete horseshit.

Anybody remeber how David Hogg was actually trying to do this, 9 months ago, earlier than that?

And... basically 0 large parts of the Dem fundraising apparatus got involved in any way?

And... because Hogg tried to do this... he got ousted from his position in the party?

https://www.aol.com/david-hogg-pledged-unleash-20m-193729589.html?guccounter=1

You uh, you coulda said something at that point, Cory.

Flamethrowers for the ratfuckers, thats how they clean em up in the sewers of NYC, I hear.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 16 points 1 day ago

These democrats think the problem is aversion to genocide and not blindly supporting the party. They would rather compromise with the Nazis, than challenge them from a leftist perspective:

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Senator Andy Kim countered accusations that the Democratic party is divided, saying “this is the most united I’ve ever seen the Senate Democrats,”

That's not a counter. Just because this is the most united he's seen the Democratic party does not mean that it is united. Divided is the natural state of Democrats. It the words of Will Rogers, “I’m not a member of any organized political party…. I’m a Democrat.”

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 20 hours ago

Oh you mean Senator Andy Kim who voted to confirm Kristi Noem, Marco Rubio and Sean Duffy? That Andy Kim?

[–] MrSelfDestruct25@fedinsfw.app 17 points 1 day ago

Absolutely true.

But Booker ain't that leader.

[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago

Starting with himself, right? Pompous asshole.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

“Americans want a new generation of leaders that show that they can lift the whole country up,” Booker added. “It is time for a new vision of our country that is far more uniting that brings people together, doesn’t deepen divides.”

And I want to see the Epstein class in a supermax prison. You know, let them see the kind of prison system they advocate for first hand.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is peak, “we need to move forward and not dwell on the past” chud rhetoric. What America needs is accountability and hostility to the right.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›