this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
21 points (83.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

48137 readers
1163 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Would you want to be Michael Jackson-level famous — not necessarily from music, but from anything: social media, entertainment, or whatever? Would you want to be as famous as him? Why or why not?

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 hours ago

No. The optimal (from a highly individual viewpoint) is being well-off, with friends but without fame.

From a societal viewpoint, the best is everyone being "upper middle class" - well off enough to live, but not so wealthy that one can simply mooch off others and give nothing back.

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 12 hours ago

I'd love to have the money, but the notoriety? Hell no. The amount of money I'd have to waste on my personal security would be infuriating. I could use that money to actually do something useful, like making the kind of donation that lets a hospital charity make sensible medium-term plans.

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Absolutely, it would be fun as hell.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

I want to be tony hawk famous. Like famous enough that at relevant events people are stoked to see me, but out in public people are just like "has anyone ever told you that you kind of look like Art3mis" and if i said i am they are just like "haha suurrre"

[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

"Are you Art3mis?" "yes" "Why?"

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 5 points 18 hours ago

Absolutely not. I don't want any level of fame. I like that I can freely walk around my hometown where I've lived for 35 years and nobody recognizes me and stops to talk.

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Nope, I wouldn't want to be famous at all. I like being able to mind my own business without being harassed or recognized on the street.

[–] homes@piefed.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Even Michael Jackson, himself, grew to hate being that famous and often lamented it in interviews before he stopped giving them, and in the few he did give before his death.

fame becomes a curse to all

edit: I remember when he died... I was walking through Washington Square Park in NYC, and I got an alert on my phone. I was so stunned, that I sat own on the nearest bench and just stared at my phone. I noticed that everyone around me also got an alert, and they all just froze... Everyone around me just froze... The whole city just STOPPED IN PLACE. it freaked me out. Then the internet went down. I tried to call a friend, but I couldn't. I couldn't send a text or load a webpage... nothing worked for, like, half an hour. shit was fucked.

The only other time I remember something like that, when I couldn't make a phone call/txt/use the internet was 9/11

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was the in ER outside Philadelphia and there were sheets between the beds. The TV was up above where we could all see it. About three beds over I heard “he bleached himself to death!”

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

How much of that bleaching was medical vs choice?

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I was on a road trip to Arizona with my ex and heard it on the radio. The triple whammy with Farrah Fawcett and Billy Mays made it pretty much all we heard on the news the entire time we were out west

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I graduated highschool the day Micheal Jackson died

[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You don't need to add "edit". No one will ever know.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 hours ago

There's an edit icon on that post...

And pointing out edits is good internet etiquette. Since edits don't change replies, someone could edit their comment and make all the replies seem unrelated etc.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Do you really have nothing better to do than post pedantic, asshole replies like this?

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Did you know edit is tide backwards?

[–] TaterTot@piefed.social 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

tide comes in, edit goes out.

You can't explain that.

Magnets man how do they work?

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Fame seems like a burden. Given a choice, I'll take the money.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago

The rule is to always be richer than you are famous -- for any value.

Thus, if I was Michael Jackson famous, I would need to be several-private-islands rich.

Of course, I wouldn't have an island. But the bunker at the resort I own would be insane.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

I'm a white guy who went to a wedding in rural India. That attention alone got to be a bit much after a few days.

Also, I would have to be stupidly careful about pretty much everything. Hackers would actually think to target me AND could have an incentive to do so knowing I've got money (gained by fraud or blackmail if I'm not careful). In my current life I go to clothing-optional places pretty regularly (not a sex club or anything) and that would pretty much have to stop.

Just let me be rich in a way that nobody knows it, preferably not even my own friends.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

As MJ?

No. There are too many aspects of that level of fame that are not only undesirable, but dangerous, and we saw that with how his life went.

I wouldn't mind being a one-hit wonder though. A couple of years of making millions and just stashing them away. I'd pull a Kerri Green and peace out at the height, take the money, and live off investment interest for the rest of my life. She only made like three movies, took the money, and told Hollywood to eff off.

It's a shame MJ didn't do that. Even after having to pay all the court settlements for broken contracts, he'd still have been alive and wealthy.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure… as a writer. Think like Stephen King. Probably the most famous living writer. Maybe James Patterson or Brandon Sanderson. They do cool shit and people recognize them for it. Doesn’t seem too bad. Has a famous author ever really had it too bad as far as fame goes? Look at Brandon Sanderson, he teaches other people about writing. Goes around talking about what he loves.

[–] IndieSpren@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, I think JK Rowling might give Stephen King a challenge for the most famous living writer title. And she's not using it for good.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 12 hours ago

Oof. Yeah. :(

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I don’t want any kind of notoriety. Good or bad. I delete accounts regularly to avoid it. I just want to be forgotten

[–] T156@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

No. Or at least, I'd have it done the way Daft Punk/Yoko Taro do. You're only known as the character in costume, and not elsewise.

Otherwise, every single aspect of your life gets pried into, and you can't trust anything to be what it seems to be. Anything you say, or opinion you hold would be a headline, and anyone who claims to want to be your friend could easily be angling for your wealth/connections more than anything else.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 4 points 23 hours ago

No. I like going out and not being bothered.

I’d like to be the producer, agent, etc of someone famous. (Not anything related to PR, though. I don’t want to downplay or “justify” some asshole’s crimes.)

Nobody outside the industry gives a fuck who those behind the scenes people are, but I’d still be pulling down the big bucks.

[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

No. I don't want any level of fame of any kind. If I became famous I'd do it by hiding my face so I can live a bother free lifestyle. Nothing appealing about famous people lives.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, that would be a nightmare.

Not being able to live a normal life because people will be interrupting you all the time entitled to something just because they recognise you.
Even if you lived in rich people areas, they are even more entitled because their family did something generations ago that means nothing to me but expect something.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

The kid who plays Percy Jackson skipped prom because of concerns his date woukd get death threats

[–] vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bro got taken out because he started exposing pedophiles. He spent his last few years being dragged in the press by parents that decided money was more important than their kids dignity or future reputation.

That level of fame essentially means you cannot possibly do actual good in the world or fight any powerful group. It's not a level of fame where you could build a revolution, but its far too much fame to ever do anything positive in life.

[–] zonklezoop@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry, I know I shouldn't, but I need to clarify. Are you saying that Michael Jackson was killed because he was exposing pedophiles?

[–] vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Yes that is the popular theory post Epstein file release. Partially a joke, partially the best explanation we have for who paid the doctor to kill him. It was either the pedos or Sony, which is full of pedos.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

I mean if the money is there, why not.

I would buy an entire country or an island and that would be it, no one would ever see me again.

[–] TaterTot@piefed.social 2 points 23 hours ago

Think I would cap out at David Sedaris levels of fame. Anything more would be too much bother.

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 3 points 1 day ago

If that includes his money than yeah.

[–] msokiovt@lemmy.today -2 points 23 hours ago

No, and here's why:

  • Required homo sapien sacrifice (yes, I was intentional with my wording)
  • Catholicism of some form is required
  • Death for not following the orders of the Pope and/or Jesuit Superior General

This is what Jackson had to do. He was murdered in 2009 through witchcraft (the numerology done on his passing proves it) due to not being Jesuit enough for the General.