this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
211 points (97.7% liked)

politics

30100 readers
2604 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] the_abecedarian@piefed.social 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

this article is so stupid.

The new socialists thus want the state to dictate the prices of many goods and services, especially essentials such as food and rent. Where money is required it will come, almost exclusively, by squeezing the very wealthiest. It is a form of retail politics that appeals not to notions of the common good, as in prior waves of socialism, but to people’s narrow self-interest. Lower my rent! Cut my bills! Give me free buses! Protect my job! The solutions are naive, and often unworkable. But the message is so simple, and so attractive, that this Gen-Z socialism is gaining adherents across the democratic world.

None of that is socialism. it's social democracy (aka gentler capitalism) at best. lower rent, lower bills, free buses, and job protections are not "selfish", they apply to everyone.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 1 points 9 hours ago

It's an Economist article. They write from the perspective of capital owners. Of course they're going to belittle socialist ideas, because they present a threat to their wealth. If they were smart they would support social democracy in order to preserve the capitalist system, but American capitalists are arrogant and shortsighted.

[–] red_tomato@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

people’s narrow self-interest

As opposed to what? The ultra wealthy’s narrow self- interest?

[–] TheDingNoiseInToolSongs@eviltoast.org 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

We had this in Germany and it worked, until they invented "new social democracy" which is just no social democracy.

[–] the_abecedarian@piefed.social 2 points 10 hours ago

social democracy's inherent weakness is that it's still capitalism, so capital is always trying to undermine it

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Whoever wrote that quoted bit is an asshole and fool.

[–] homes@piefed.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

“Tool of the capitalist state” was the first phrase that jumped to mind. “Enemy of the people.” was another.

“Fuck that person” was what I settled upon

[–] BottleBoardBakon@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Aren't all of those things the common good? It is not my, my, my... It is our, our, our.

I agree, yet another economist L

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It is a form of retail politics that appeals not to notions of the common good, as in prior waves of socialism, but to people’s narrow self-interest.

And what form of retail politics predicated it? Oh that's right, a type of politics for the narrow self-interests of <1% of the country. Lower my taxes! Cut me a tax break for my private jet! Give me a bail out! Protect my company!

[–] homes@piefed.world 3 points 1 day ago

Fuck that article so much.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

New? Many of these things are employed in smarter countries because we know they work. We've just been dismantling social safety nets and wasting money on state sponsored violence instead, so we're decades behind everyone else and act surprised that socialist fundamentals help with social problems tied to biased capitalism.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey don’t forget about state sponsored bail outs for business owners!

The socialism is good if it’s for the ruling class!

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

Privatize the profits, Socialize the losses.

[–] homes@piefed.world 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

From Gen-X, i’m here with you kids

FWIW: I still consider myself a kid

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

X gonna give it to ya. (Same here, just being silly.)

[–] homes@piefed.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Oh, was i not silly enough for ya kitten?

😛

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

meow? (is that the right answer?)

[–] homes@piefed.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You’re not supposed to smoke it.

Wait.

I’m pretty sure you are. But not all at once!

[–] homes@piefed.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I do believe the instructions were to “eat me“ or “drink me“

Had Alice smoked either, I’m quite positive that the adventures she had had would have been a lot more… “explosively colorful”

I happen to know that from “experience”

I decided to get to New a new roommate in 2012 in this manner by welcoming him with some 1990s era acid.

He’s still lost somewhere in Prospect Park

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, but the cat was always smoking a hookah.

[–] homes@piefed.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We all went in lost

The point is not to find our way out; goal is to be found

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Noone ever truely grows up. Some people are just better at hiding it (or choose not to).

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I never met a mud puddle. I don’t want to jump in. With both feet.

[–] CarpalTunnelButt@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Is Zohran GenZ or millennial?

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Zohran's pretty clear into millennial territory at 35, but I think the article is referring to his primary voter base which showed a massive jump of under-30s compared to pretty much every other candidate in recent history.

Anyone who is in their 30s and early 40s is a millennial at this moment. Us old ass Gen Zers are pushing 30 now lol.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or leftist? I thought he was DemSoc.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Isn't the term leftist encompassing both socialist and democratic socialists, including communism and Marxism? I also associate it with humanism.

[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

In the US, it's anyone left of fascist now.

[–] homes@piefed.world 2 points 1 day ago

Keep doing the right thing, and nobody will care

[–] Knaegten@feddit.dk 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For all of us paywalled, can we get a resumé?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] homes@piefed.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That people keep asking this question

No, wait, that’s older than I am 😘

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago

Until the real rulers are no longer amused, and slap them down.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au -5 points 1 day ago

lol. Good luck!