this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
200 points (99.0% liked)

News

38036 readers
2216 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 78 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Shoplifting. The woman was under suspicion of shoplifting. That's why the cop/murderer shot at her... for shoplifting!

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 days ago

A single box of diapers no less.

[–] slowmolaggins@thelemmy.club 16 points 1 day ago

It's important to note that there is no proof, and the family denies any wrongdoing. The simple fact is they were shot at and the baby was murdered over an accusation.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Not just that but fucking diapers. One no should have called cops on her so fuck that person with fucking razor wire, but her child murdered by police over fucking diapers fuck the cops and the store and we should riot over this shit.

[–] Carl@anarchist.nexus 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And she shoplifted diapers. Here’s a reminder that if you see someone shoplifting essentials like food or diapers, no you fucking didn’t.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Of course I didn't, I was busy distracting the door greeter so they could leave.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yet more proof that regular police shouldn't have standard firearms. They obviously do not have adequate training and/or critical thinking skills necessary to determine use of force.

Firing at a moving vehicle, in a Walmart parking lot, for a shoplifting call, is absolutely ridiculous.

If firearms are actually needed, get SWAT. And that doesn't even get into why officers aren't required to carry insurance like doctors. Insurance companies would drop these dipshits and make them unemployable anywhere in the country immediately.

And none of that even gets into the potential for race being a factor, as it so very often is when it comes to police shooting people.

Also of note, no arrests have been made. So despite this supposedly being for shoplifting, the unharmed mother wasn't arrested for shoplifting? Why would that be unless there was no shoplifting?

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Murdered* not killed fixed that for you.

I want to argue with your wording, but I am struggling to find a solid argument. The best I have is that the office probably didn't know the baby was there. And was shooting at the driver, who apparently was the only one not hit. So attempted murder maybe, with a side of reckless endangerment, manslaughter, and a whole litney of things for killing the wrong person. At which point murder is just simpler. A human is far more manuverable, and with so many things to dodge behing in the "crowded" parking lot, should have no trouble evading the car without shooting.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Morose hypothetical that I'm almost afraid to voice in case it gives some evil asshole an idea: most states have laws that attach murder charges to lesser crimes if a person dies in the process of committing that crime. Will Mississippi try charging this woman with murder for her baby dying during the process of shoplifting and fleeing police?

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

She wasn’t shoplifting… she had a receipt for the diapers

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Do you have a source for this?

Because I've read 10 different reports of this now from all across the news sphere with various biases, and can't find a receipt mentioned anywhere.

I can 100% believe it to be accurate, from the reporting, even if they had a receipt, the police never had a chance to verify before deciding to shoot at them. Police rolling up to a Walmart responding to a call about diapers being shoplifted, and immediately shooting the first black people carrying diapers they see without talking to a single person is completely believable unfortunately.

I will point out in support however that no arrests have been made. So the police didn't arrest the unharmed mother for shoplifting? Unless there wasn't actually any shoplifting at all, maybe because they did have a receipt.

But without a source for the receipt claim, this looks like intentional disinformation, which isn't uncommon in these types of cases, lots of misinformation gets spread around very quickly.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I saw it posted on other social media and did just parrot what I read

But upon further examination I found this quote which is not definitive but they are asserting a very easily disprovable claim which makes me side with the victims as I would assume that the police would try and get the video of the shoplifting out if they had it

“Wiley denied police claims that her friend was shoplifting, and said the purchase of baby diapers was likely caught on camera in the self-checkout. She added she had not been charged by police.”

https://www.commercialappeal.com/story/news/2026/06/17/mississippi-mother-speaks-after-mississippi-police-officer-shoots-1-year-old-kohen-wiley/90593788007/

https://www.localmemphis.com/article/news/local/kohen-wiley-senatobia-shooting-mother/522-67b5ce4a-ed9c-4d0e-b4e8-10e54d2717a7

[–] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

What happened to due process? I'm sure they will turn up a receipt if there is one.

I wonder why the cop found it reasonable to skip due process and go straight to execution. Maybe it has to do with how they had to be trained before firing at random civilians?

[–] Carl@anarchist.nexus 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Most of the time, it needs to be a felony. Shoplifting diapers isn’t a felony. They may try to throw some sort of “she made the officers fear for their lives by driving away from them” BS at her to charge her with a felony assault… But just the shoplifting wouldn’t be enough for those laws to apply.

I saw a john oliver on this. They put a guy away for giving his car keys to a friend who then used the car in a burglary where they shot a guy. So I think the bar is low in a lot of states. Someone else said the diapers weren't stolen, but I am sure they will ring her up for failure to obey an officer or using a vehicle as a deadly weapon, then smack on that other charge who's name I forget.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

No no it was an officer-involved shooting, I'm sure

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 5 points 2 days ago

How DARE they ~~MURDER Millions of People Via PRICE GOUGING and CLIMATE DESTRUCTION!~~ Steal $10 worth of ESSENTIAL Goods!

-Pro Lifers!

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

AFTER police shoot at car???

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Well technically, yes.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Exact same thing just happened in Lebanon.