this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
124 points (96.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

48555 readers
583 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ApollosArrow@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

For us it was design.

The form submission and info would go to HR for background checks and systems, I usually didn’t look at that information, just the resume. My department was about animation and designed, so the first step of the process was seeing how much attention to detail you gave your resume. All that design would also throw off some of those resume scanning apps as well. It may have gotten better at doing so, but at least for me it did help.

Every once in a while people would forget to add obvious information on their resume, like their website, address, etc (usually the first red flag). That’s when that redundant info would also help.

[–] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Structured data vs. unstructured data. The form is structured data and it can be manipulated easily and reliably with code. With unstructured data it's a lot of guesswork and chance.

Also sometimes HR can't use the resume because the name could reveal gender or ethnicity and they need to blind that. And it's not trivial to manipulate any part of the resume to do that masking.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

For the same reason that when you research and buy a product, the computer starts telling you to buy the product you just bought. Absurdity.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Use auto fill in your browser for all.

If you're typing that shit manually, you don't deserve the job.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Wrong people.

Do not copy paste resume details. Tailor each submission to match the job. There's no other waycto beat the AI right now other than to regurgitate job details back at them.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Old school human readable and machine readable. Redundant now but the sufferring is funny to some, so it must continue.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 9 points 21 hours ago

HR reads the forms. The hiring manager reads the resume.

[–] iconic_admin@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because fuck you, that’s why. You’re not a human being to them.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How it feels to be part of a union that negotiated so hard my employer backed down from all compromises and just accepted a 3% raise retroactive to last year, as well as this year, along with a massive increase in benefits.

[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 10 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

A retroactive raise? Goddamn those are some beautiful words

[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 4 points 20 hours ago (2 children)
[–] sunsofold@lemmy.zip 7 points 20 hours ago

It means getting paid a special check equalling the amount extra you would have been paid if you had gotten the raise last year.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago

It means all of the hours I worked last year and this year are recalculated at my new 3% raised rate in 2025, and the 3% on top of the 2025 raise for this year.

I.e. if I made $100 000 in 2025 over 2000 hours for $50/hr, my 2025 wage would be upped to $51.50/hr, meaning I get a cheque for $3000 (minus taxes, pension, and dues)

That also means I would earn $106 090 this year, so any hours I worked this year would be at my new new rate of $53.045/hr

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago

Plus retroactive money in the bank for certain benefits they just pay out since it costs more money to track and verify usage, so they gave up tracking and just give it out to everyone at the start of the year.

[–] josephc@lemmy.ml 13 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

It started with basic indifference and became a feature.

In the beginning, people were manually receiving and reviewing resumes given to them in person.

This moved online and, for a time, normal humans continued to upload their resumes. Humans continued to review them.

Eventually someone decided they wanted to spam resumes, like someone swiping right on every potential Tinder match and turning people down later. This spam became problematic, so companies needed a way to automatically filter folks. Extracting info from PDFs wasn't easy at the time.

Having a form to fill out prevented some spam and let them do keyword searches and filtering, but more importantly now it gives them two things: It prefilters people who don't care enough to complete it and add a sight sunk cost bias to folks who are on the fence.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 39 points 1 day ago

To make you jump through hoops. How else can they know for sure that you follow directions no matter how stupid they are.

[–] Doom@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Free labor. Gotta know early if you'll do redundant useless tasks without compensation.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Because your experience as a job applicant is not high on their list of priorities. Their job application portal was made by an intern 25 years ago, and has been updated in a haphazard fashion by other interns according to the whims of random middle managers who wanted X or Y information at some point through the years. How seamless and enjoyable your experience is literally doesnt matter at all to them up until the point where they start failing to attract mid-tier applicants because of it. If anyone is aware of how shitty it is at all, they don't care, because fixing it requires time that that person could instead spend on (1) things that will look good on their resume to get a promotion or another job, (2) things they were actually told to do so they won't get fired, or (3) going home and having a life.

Why don't they just use AI to read the resumes and categorize applicants? Well, because AI is often wrong. And because implementing an AI solution takes someone's time, and (again) all those someones want to spend their time elsewhere.

Job applicants that they actually want to hire don't go through that portal. They find out about the job via networking, then their interview consists of a hearty handshake.

[–] homes@piefed.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Because fuck you, that’s why

It’s the first step in you accepting the fact that you are a useless piece of meat for them to abuse. If you can’t accept that first step, you could not possibly accept everything that comes afterward. and it will always get much worse after that.

And if you’re unwilling to accept that abuse, you’re not a suitable candidate for wage slavery at whatever company you just applied to

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

OCR is fallible. The forms are for the robot to quickly filter based on tags. The resume is for the human to quickly filter based on vibes.

Edit: I'm not saying that OCR is necessarily part of the system. I'm saying that, while OCR is the type of technology one might use to parse data from resumes of various file types, it's unreliable enough that having the duplicate form fields as a way to gather the information you want in a clean and processable way is an effective supplement or replacement.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

OP was talking about pasting the text from the resume into their forms, so OCR shouldn't even be involved. Once pasted in, why even require the resume anymore?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] shirasho@feddit.online 13 points 1 day ago

One is for HR to use to immediately reject your application. The other is to train their AI model.

[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

To make sure you will follow directions without question even if they don't make any sense

My conspiracy theory is that it's a plausibly deniable way to filter out disabled people

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

To make life even more of a hassle. Ugh

[–] amio@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

It's easy to make you do it, that's all.

[–] teft@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

To let you know how the relationship is going to go.

[–] snek_boi@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some are saying that it’s to have both human-readable and machine-readable data. I don’t doubt that some places do that. But others don’t.

I worked at a college HR and we asked candidates for a a bunch of stuff, including both a CV and a form.

The CV was given to whoever decided whether that person was hired or not.

The forms were given to HR, so that we could independently verify information and manually add information to the college’s records.

[–] Lehmuusa@nord.pub 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Why didn't HR use the CVs for that? Can they not read?

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

CV has a lot of fluff that HR doesn't require.

For example, your previous employer's name and maybe your post there is sufficient. They don't need to know what your projects were.

[–] Lehmuusa@nord.pub 1 points 1 day ago

So? It's magnificently easy not reading those parts of the CV.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kubica@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago

Has it happened to you that there is something that you don't know how to put in the limited set of options they give you? They don't know what the proper fix would be either without fixing the forms. Of course they don't want to fix anything, so you better figure out a way to make that data fit in if you want it there.

[–] tunetardis@piefed.ca 4 points 1 day ago

It's for the Dept. of Redundancy Dept.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

Whatever HR systems they’re using are designed one way, and they aren’t designed to interface with whatever file type your resume is. And they likely never will be.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

Or further will auto parse your resume and then do it wrong and then appear to allow you to make changes only for those changes to revert once you you confirm the application.

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

Laziness because it is literally their job. I've done it a hundred times and I have no other explanation.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Pretty sure it's because we live in hell and are being tortured by malevolent entities. I'm unclear on whether we are being punished for long-forgotten sins in our past lives, or whether it's more of a feeding off our suffering for sustinance situation. Could be both.

The only thing I know for sure is that whatever beings set things up that way are not recognizable to me as human.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 23 hours ago

My HR did/does that. It's super annoying. They basically keep records to be able to use them against you one day for good or bad.

Like if you hurt yourself...hmmm ok let's put some safety in place. But if you do it several times, obviously you are a liability so GTFO! Or if you complain about something, they tell you to wait some time before firing you. Otherwise it might look like retaliation...then if you say ..oh retaliation....hmmm judge, this idiot kept clumsily getting hurt at work. So we did something to keep him safe. But in reality if because you are just not effective and complained about it. HR is a bunch of sneaky bastards. They're not there to help you. They're just there to help themselves and the company. The company, not you.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 2 points 1 day ago

So they don’t have to.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Poorly designed process. Would you really want to work for that company?

load more comments
view more: next ›