this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
205 points (99.5% liked)

UK Politics

5545 readers
63 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world 57 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Good riddance.

Let's hope something worse doesn't show up.

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 57 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Narrator: "something worse showed up."

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fonix232@fedia.io 40 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Fookin hell mate, I leave for a few days and all hell gets loose?

Let's hope the next PM is less of an undercooked potato than Starmer was.

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 37 points 5 days ago (7 children)

When was the last time there was a good one? In my lifetime there's been Thatcher, Major, Blair, Brown, Cameron, May, Johnson, Truss, Sunak and Starmer. Name one good one amongst that rogues gallery. I will not hold my breath.

[–] Mertn33@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Truss, She was fantastic. For a week or two. Crashed the pound and made it cheaper to send my UK daughter some birthday money.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 10 points 4 days ago

Truss, She was fantastic. For a week or two

No, you are thinking of the cabbage!

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (12 children)

God, choosing a least bad one is even hard. ~~David Cameron or~~ Gordon Brown? I don’t know if I was just less informed about British politics during their tenures or if they were actually better.

Edit: oof, I forgot about how Cameron handled brexit, not him.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Probably Gordon Brown or John Major.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Brown sold off the gold reserve when gold was at a record low. He tried to increase pre-charge detention to 42 days and to introduce lie detectors into benefits claims.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 13 points 4 days ago

Never claimed he was perfect. You can find fault with literally every PM that has ever existed. But him and Major seemed to be relatively scandal free compared to many who have come before and after them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Cameron brought us get the unemployed to work unpaid for private corporations to keep their unemployment benefits.

If you want to argue that is technically paid work you can buy then it was paid at £1.60/hour, far below minimum wage and the tax payer was paying it rather than the corporation benefiting from it.

[–] Mertn33@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Slavery runs strong in British history

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz 11 points 5 days ago
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I would like to believe that this is causal not correlative. You leaving caused this to happen. You are too powerful.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 5 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I've got an idea!

I will start a holiday fund. Whenever y'all want a new PM, just donate enough so I can head off for a week or two. With a country of 60 million people... If just half of you want a new PM, a single one penny donation will make it happen.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fucking finally.

Now lets see how much worse the next one is...

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If he can at least read the room it would be an improvement. Starmer spent most of his time trying to appease reform voters.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 21 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Can't wait for the media to work their magic on Burnham until he too is universally reviled. It already seems to have started.

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 days ago

It wasn't the media's fault that Burnham basically up and said "I agree with everything Labour has done under Starmer".

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You okay Britain? You've been going through PMs like DiCaprio goes through 20 year olds.

[–] Tweak@feddit.uk 8 points 4 days ago

Murdoch says we need a new PM so...

[–] Ougie@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If only more countries did the same

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

After burning down the UK, he gets to enjoy his golden parachute how lovely!

[–] TWeaK@lemmy.today 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"Burning down the UK" like introducing a massive renter's rights bill?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He's a politician so on Lemmy we burn them all apparently?

[–] TWeaK@lemmy.today 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean I'm on board with that - figuratively, not literally. Sack them all, let us vote directly on anything MP's vote on.

But if we're not doing that Kier staying where he was would be much better than this.

I genuinely don't understand why he's left. Nothing has happened. The only people pushing for this are the media, and it makes me wonder if someone in that group has made a serious threat against him and/or his family.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Or someone is using the group as a threat. We're getting conspiratorial, but it's not unheard of

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

To be fair, Conservatives started the fire more than a decade earlier. Starmer just failed to meet expectations, sometimes in egregious ways.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 9 points 4 days ago

Comes in, shits on table, leaves

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 15 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Maybe I've not been playing close enough attention to politics, but I'm not entirely sure what he's done so wrong to warrant this. He's very middle of the road, hardly wowing everyone, but hardly very scandalous either (well, apart from appointing Mandelson I guess). Is this now just going to become the norm, changing PM's every year?

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 44 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (19 children)

Under his tenure:

  • terrorism laws have been exploited to criminalise property damage and the holding of signs by pensioners
  • the nation's medical records have been sold off to the known foreign fascist controlled private company Palantir
  • our freedoms on the internet have been curtailed
  • he appointed a known friend of a paedophile and twice previously disgraced minister as US ambassador despite vetting saying not to
  • austerity has continued
  • the broken workfare (not welfare) system has continued
  • the UK has continued to supply weapons and intelligence to a genocidal state
  • trial by jury is looking likely to be abolished
  • private water is still a fucking disgrace with little done to remedy it

He's a wet blanket who's incapable of commanding a cabinet, and spends more time making stupid TikToks like he's on the campaign trail than doing anything of substance. His actions, cabinet, and command of that cabinet, contradict everything he says he stands for.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] FishFace@piefed.social 11 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Absolutely nothing. He's not been amazing by any stretch, but his net approval rating is -46, beating Liz Truss at the height of her unpopularity by a mere 1 percentage point. Liz Truss crashed the economy and the entire country knew it, while Starmer has... U-turned on a few things. Generally been a bit milquetoast. Speaks with a nasal voice?

image

His unpopularity is deeper than Boris Johnson, who was swilling wine with his mates while the rest of us were enjoying the delights of yet another quiz on Zoom, who illegally prorogued parliament to deliberately impede the democratic operation of parliament, ever reached.

And the same will happen to Burnham, and in two years we'll be going into another general election with the least popular PM ever and the Labour party will again be tearing itself to shreds, and hand the country over to Reform or whatever even more nakedly racist self-consciously obnoxious bile has emerged out of the right wing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] thehatfox@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

The majority of the public is desperate for change, and running out of patience with a political system that doesn't deliver.

Starmer ran on a vague platform of change and competence, but since taking office Starmer has shown have little political vision or political acumen to move the country forward. The Labour government has been less beset by personal scandal, but the bar for that was already incredibly low.

[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fascist, anti-trans, surveillance kinda sums it up nicely.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PodPerson@lemmy.zip 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How many Truss's did Starmer last?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ReluctantZen@feddit.nl 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How important is the PM's position in terms of policy and power? Are they closer to the US president, or are they more a representative of whatever the cabinet and ministries are doing? In case of the latter, does Starmer's resignation really matter if that doesn't change?

[–] Rookeh@startrek.website 2 points 3 days ago

The PM is the head of government and is ultimately responsible and accountable for its actions and policies. They are also the head of their political party and thus will have a say on what policies are brought to the table (although they do still need to be voted on in the houses).

Our PM is not technically the head of state (that's the King, from whose power the government derives its authority), however for all intents and purposes they may as well be.

So yes, his resignation will have an impact.

Wait, I had this on my... Last years bingo dammit!

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Epstein pedophile handing contracts to pedo Peter Thiel’s palantir

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 8 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Well I respect that he's had the grace to not make it messy

[–] AbsolutelyNotSpez@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

What are you talking about? It's been messy for ages by now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›