this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
110 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

21894 readers
1494 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] moondoggie@lemmy.world 16 points 51 minutes ago

These aren’t “the wealthy” - most of these are priced at $50k-75k. That’s prepper nutjob price ranges and it’s no surprise that they’re shooting people with front end loaders since obviously it’s the government disguised as the company workers, coming to dig them out and take their guns.

The people who are actually wealthy have the means to not live in a hole in South Dakota surrounded by other people in their own holes. Their hole in the ground will be somewhere much less advertised.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 29 points 1 hour ago

During one particularly hairy incident, a man who moved into one of the units with his wife, his daughter, and her four children, pulled a gun on a Vivos contractor who had pulled up with a front-end loader to his bunker.

The resident eventually shot the contractor, injuring him. However, South Dakota’s stand-your-ground law led to a grand jury declining to indict him.

It's telling that one of these billionaires was the type to kill a worker trying to do their job near his property. And "stand your ground" laws were created by and for gun nuts who want to murder someone. Change my mind...

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 4 points 48 minutes ago

The worker should've watched The 100 or Fall Out, plenty of warnings there. /s

[–] reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca 62 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Who would have thought confining some of the most self-centred, egotistical, greedy and morally flexible people together in a living situation might not work out.

Shocker..

[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 33 points 2 hours ago (5 children)

It's kind of like their own punishment. They'll laugh as they descend into their bunkers, thinking "no one can get in!" Not knowing that the exits will be boarded up.

At last, one of them will emerge, after having ate the other occupants - children included - and they will be met by a crowd of brown people (global warming caused "white genocide").

The crowd will then drag the surviving billionaire to a down square, where they'll be submerged into a vat of liquid metal, forming a statue with a horrid look on it's face, to be mounted on a block with a placard titled "The Last Billionaire".

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 3 points 50 minutes ago

Nah. These bunkers all have air holes and we have a lot of concrete :)

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago

Can I vote for you? You seem like leadership.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

They think no one can get in, we think none of them will ever get out.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 1 points 52 minutes ago

Can we just fake a catastrophe now to get them to all go in?

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 20 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

STOP! I cant get any harder and it aint going down anytime soon

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Have you tried flicking it?

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

In a manner of speaking

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 13 points 2 hours ago

"I'm not locked in with you, you're locked in with me", but they all believe they're the "me"

[–] Carighan@piefed.world 1 points 36 minutes ago

But wait! What if we buy a cruise ship and sell the cabins on it as law-free estate for these freaks? Certainly that one has to work out, right?!

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 4 points 1 hour ago

[off topic?]

"Children Of Strife" by Adrian Tchaikovsky.

It's the last book in a series, but can be read as a stand alone.

A group of trillionaires travel to a distant planet in hopes of terraforming it.

Things don't go as planned...

[–] ace_garp@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

You are now subscribed to Bunker Facts.

(Please, make me an SMS service which has daily updates on this saga)

[–] Janx@piefed.social 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If this is really the best of humanity that will weather the storm, we could be doomed after all.

Way to lick the boot, Victor Tangermann. Just because they survive this hypothetical "life-extinction event" doesn't make them better or special, it makes them lucky that they inherited or exploited so many resources. In fact, the limitless greed of billionaires and giant corporations is almost certainly what will doom us all. Hoarding more wealth than you could ever spend while others suffer and starve isn't "the best of us", it's psychotic...

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

I read it as tongue firmly planted in cheek, especially after he noted they were using the courts to address issues with their “post apocalyptic fantasy” community.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 1 points 36 minutes ago

Maybe. Unfortunately, too many genuinely use the same language to refer to wealth-hoarders. Also, when the very first sentence in an article written by the Senior Editor of a publication contains a typo, I tend not to give them the benefit of the doubt.

More and more wealthy individualsare buying up luxurious underground shelters to survive the apocalypse, whether it’s in the form of a nuclear conflict that turns the Earth’s surface into a radioactive wasteland, or a devastating pandemic that decimates the global population.

[–] unabart@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

Not a television guy, but if you convinced these jackoffs the world was ending, forcing them to flee to their bunker commune, o'd watch a reality tv show of them in the bunker going lord of the flies on each other.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

That's actually part of a whole chapter in World War Z. A mercenary from the rich people's resort who later ditched them reveals that once the common people started showing up to their door rather than zombies, an immediate fight broke out between all of the residents and their staff, with most of them killing each other. The mercenaries refused to intervene because they were hired to kill infected, not normal people, and had no loyalty to the rich residents.

The whole thing was broadcast live because the owner of the resort wanted to flaunt their status during the great panic.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 23 minutes ago

The mercenaries refused to intervene because they were hired to kill infected, not normal people, and had no loyalty to the rich residents.

The most unrealistic part. They're mercenaries, they're loyal to money

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 1 hour ago

I've thought about that. Scare them all into hiding in their bunkers, and then never tell them that there never was a threat.

They can live in their precious bunkers, while we all go on with real life. 25 years from now, one of them will poke their heads out, and say "HEY! How long as everything been okay?" And we can say, "Since the day you people went into your bunkers, now get back in there!"

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

This should be nonnegotiable

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 2 hours ago

I saw that Twilight Zone episode! It was a good one!

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 hours ago

Crazy to think the best place to be in a major crisis is to stay put with your family and the local people you have common ground with rather than randos who just try to solve their problems with isolated wealth, huh?

(There's nuance to that, of course. If everyone in your town has to evacuate, go with them.)