254
He should try declaring the vote illegitimate and inciting a mob to take over the House—that’s a good trick!
Jokes! We got ‘em!
Nah, he needs to let some of his Republican colleagues get sexually abused and not say anything about it.
Poor Gym, this level of abuse must be a lot to wrestle with.
Heyyyo!
His suffering is like a poultice to my bruised psyche.
His pain, our medicine.
His tears, our water.
Bless you friend.
And a special cheers to Reuters photog Jonathan Ernst who captured all of the frustration, regret, and failure of the moment in one sour expression: a sweet, sweet nectar!
Pulitzer material right there.
Should use that as the next cover of Man of the year.
Agreed. Suitable for framing.
I barely recognized him with his mouth closed and his jacket on.
More deliciousness here
He's great at keeping his mouth closed when there's talk of sexually abuse of students.
Zing!
Jordan, a man who has not been able to get anything through Congress in three decades. Yeah, that’s a guy you want in charge of a legislative body.
When your objective is to sabotage government, it is.
Keep in mind that representatives are really still playing high school gossip games as their day-to-day life, and I'm imagining a dialog like:
MAGAists: you'll never elect a speaker without us. That makes it our party and we're the boss.
OldGOP: Everyone else wants to make Steve Scalise the speaker, and you can have these fancy titles if you go along.
MAGAists: Nah, we tried that with whats-his-name. We're the boss now.
OldGOP: *eyeroll* Fine, put up your guy and see what happens.
*Jim Jordan loses*
*surprised pikachu*
To be fair, a lot boring old Republicans voted for this guy for the same reason they supported Trump. They’re afraid of being called out by the base and or being primaried for not being right wing enough.
The only people who are standing up are the people in districts that are still purple. And there are fewer and fewer of those because of gerrymandering.
Fox News was actually threatening to sic the base on people who voted against Jordan, according to something I heard on the local community radio earlier. They sent stuff saying like, “Is it true that Representative X is against confirming Jordan? When are you going to let the peoples house open, the people want to know.” To someone at the house. There was another sentence basically threatening to turn their base loose on individual reps if they didn’t flip flop and support Jordan. I’ll have to see if I can dig up an article.
The Republicans have gone so far down the rabbit hole of stupidity that they no longer understand what leadership even means.
I suggest Gym go fuck himself with a saguaro.
Just try it another 14 times! Worked last time.
If my tumescence lasts for more than fourteen votes should I call a doctor?
By the way, just WHERE is that documentary on him? When is that going to come out?
He's going to go back to his old tried and true methods and help Gaetz avoid repercussions for sex trafficking a minor.
That's not numberwang.
I have a vehicle with normal gibberish for a license number. I bought a plate frame that says, “That’s Numberwang!!”
I know it’s only one in a thousand that someone will actually recognize the joke and get it, but that it is non-zero makes it all worth it to me.
I’m telling you just so that one other person who knows the glorious game of Numberwang is aware. I live for these jokes.
Dude looks like a super villain.
Meh- I’d say mediocre villain with delusions of grandeur at best. Really just one of a bunch of shitty off-brand Hall-of-Fascists barely-adequate-and-overcompensating villains.
He's a villain alright. Just not a super one. What's the difference? PRESENTATION!
He's not smart enough to be a super villain.
Diet villain.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The loss means that for now the House remains leaderless, as it has been since a handful of Republican hardliners engineered Kevin McCarthy's ouster as speaker two weeks ago.
Many of them are moderates who represent politically competitive districts, while others specialize in negotiating the complex spending bills that keep the U.S. government running, deals that typically require a willingness to compromise.
Four Republicans from the New York City area said they voted against Jordan because he opposed benefits for survivors of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, as well as tax policies and disaster aid that would help their residents.
"He is a patriot, an America First warrior who wins the toughest of fights," Republican Representative Elise Stefanik said as she nominated Jordan for speaker on the House floor.
Democratic Representative Pete Aguilar said on the House floor that Jordan's election would show the U.S.' enemies that "the very people who seek to undermine democracy are rewarded with positions of immense power.
A fixture on conservative media outlets, Jordan has used his perch as chair of the House Judiciary Committee to help lead an impeachment inquiry into Biden that Democrats decry as baseless.
The original article contains 781 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Good bot
Do we do that here? Honest question from a transplant.
Call me a traditionalist.
Plus an easy way to give ups to the devs.
Also a transplant. This bot is on virtually every post. No need to give it unneeded praise.
Suppose you should refrain then
Agreed and I do.
I think they should give Dolly Parton a call. Bet her whip count is better.
Dolly is too busy actually helping Americans to be wasting time on this clown show
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
254 points (97.4% liked)
politics
19107 readers
3984 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS