2459
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] yote_zip@pawb.social 320 points 11 months ago

"If you don't wear Special Clothes around me I'm going to lose it."

When are we going to move past costuming for work?

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 90 points 11 months ago

The only costume I wanna wear for work is a mascot costume for a sports team that named themselves after an animal.

[-] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 90 points 11 months ago

It's ok to admit you're a furry on the Internet. We run the damn thing, after all

[-] Fal@yiffit.net 31 points 11 months ago

Look at the instance that user is from

[-] Jimbo@yiffit.net 19 points 11 months ago

This comment chain is a yiffit party

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] clearedtoland@lemmy.world 53 points 11 months ago

Nonsense ideology that dates back to medieval times. I subscribed to it for years until I realized it had no bearing on my work. I tell my interns and staff “dress appropriately,” meaning be comfortable - unless we’re meeting with clients, whose expectations may not align.

[-] rwhitisissle@lemmy.world 44 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Dress codes serve as class signifiers. Like most rules of decorum, they're cultural artifacts used to delineate the haves from the have-nots. They don't dislike the fact that Fetterman refuses to wear a suit. They dislike the fact that he dresses like the common people he actually represents. Whereas they dress like the people they represent - capitalist oligarchs. They're wanting to close ranks and keep people from realizing that not everyone in the senate serves the same masters.

[-] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 27 points 11 months ago

People with their little collars and jackets and ties to make them feel important

[-] PlatinumSf@pawb.social 24 points 11 months ago

Isn't the logic that it's an easy thing to use as a sign of conformance? A check to see if you're willing to compromise your personal choices for the groups mandate?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Probably never. People will always judge others based on how they are dressed. We subconsciously attach a certain image of what people should look like. And these dress codes are often enforced by society indirectly. 99% of people would not want to have a lawyer dressed casually to court and will pick someone else even if the alternative is by all accounts not as good as the casually dressed lawyer.

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'd be happy to have a lawyer in casual attire if it wouldn't bias the judge and jury against him (or me).

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 11 months ago

Thats right. I judge them by how they are dressed. Fetterman is a working class american, and the others are my enemy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Squirrel@thelemmy.club 130 points 11 months ago

You see, this impacts them. Never mind that there's no actual impact, they only want those among them who behave as expected. Also, he got excessive attention due to his attire, which gave him a bigger audience for his political views.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 42 points 11 months ago

So youre saying that things need to impact these people?

[-] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

Only very small things though. A few millimetres at most.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 129 points 11 months ago

Once the Miserables found themselves outvoted in the Estates General of 1789 by about 3% of the population (the ones with money), it became very uncomfortable in France for aristocrats.

Just saying,

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] cricket97@lemmy.world 80 points 11 months ago

Would love to see some bipartisan support for banning congress members from trading stocks. Both sides are doing it to such a degree that they are more likely to be replaced before any legislation regarding this gets passed. Obligatory Nancy Pelosi Stock Tracker link: https://twitter.com/PelosiTracker_/

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 11 months ago

Formal dress codes are upper class by aesthetics. Its just another little bite of compliance that one is expected to take before joining those in power.

[-] taladar@sh.itjust.works 35 points 11 months ago

It is funny and sad how many ways of getting ahead in society can be interpreted as testing your tolerance for bullshit.

[-] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 49 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Okay. All those fat old men (on both sides) wearing ill fitting suits should be expelled from houses of government until they wear a fitted suit. Same with the women.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 44 points 11 months ago

Their priorities are “fuck you got mine”

[-] m3t00@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago

need a retirement age for all public employees. I mean let them get paid to do nothing where we don't have to listen to them pretending to do serious stuff.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Pixlbabble@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago

I mean they kinda always had it out for hoodies.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 26 points 11 months ago

Ever since that one congressman wore one to protest the treatment of black kids by the police for wearing them.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 26 points 11 months ago

They put up a dress code, then one of their own rocks up wearing denim dungarees.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Fuck that.

Denim three piece suit

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] badbytes@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 23 points 11 months ago

And where is the public uproar about this? I only hear crickets.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] popcap200@lemmy.ml 19 points 11 months ago

Isn't insider trading literally illegal tho?

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 110 points 11 months ago

Technically, yes, per the STOCK Act. But there's a loophole for Congress.

It doesn't count as "insider trading" for them if the information they use is based on bills they are passing as a part of their job.

Democrats have repeatedly tried to pass a law to ban this loophole as well, such as Adam Schiff from January of this year, but Republicans always vote such bills down or have them die in committee.

[-] microphone900@lemmy.ml 15 points 11 months ago

That sounds like we should follow Congress' stock trades for our own benefit. I bet there's a tracker out there since all that is supposed to be public information.

[-] AtariDump@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

There is but the data is delayed by (I think) 30-ish days.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 27 points 11 months ago

Not if you're a member of Congress.

[-] 8bitguy@kbin.social 18 points 11 months ago

Not for congresspeople. Just normal citizens.

[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

any publicity is good publicity and maybe he can use this platform to get his messages across

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
2459 points (98.5% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9606 readers
399 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS