110

I'm sure anyone using this would be thrilled to get my hairy non-binary ass pulling up

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xi_simping@hexbear.net 71 points 9 months ago

there is only one gender and its corporate memphis

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 41 points 9 months ago

:corporate-art:

[-] RION@hexbear.net 64 points 9 months ago

If they're not from the Nonbinarié region of France they're just sparkling women tbh

[-] WoofWoof91@hexbear.net 60 points 9 months ago

love being seen as a spicy woman

[-] Timberknave@hexbear.net 49 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Cynicism about corporations and lib pseudo-feminism with queer language appropriationsinb4 it gets turned into "AFAB only"

[-] PM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS@hexbear.net 41 points 9 months ago

Did you like AFAB only housing? You'll love AFAB only drivers!

[-] AcidSmiley@hexbear.net 34 points 9 months ago

The whole AFAB only shit makes me almost glad we have the "FLINTA is alienating to transmasculine people" discourse in my country instead.

You see, the most common way of saying "women +" in German progressive circles is FLINTA, which stands for women, lesbians, inter, nonbinary, trans and agender. They really try to cover everyone who isn't a cis dude and that works really well as long as you need a catchall term including everybody marginalized around gender issues. It's like an easier way of saying "not an endo cis dude". But then you have people trying to apply the label to spaces they want to mark as "women only" and suddenly you have the problem of labeling a bunch of people who really do not want that as "women light". The FLINTA label fits fine if you want to say "cis and trans women, he/him lesbians and non-binary, inter and agender people that do not fall on the transmasc side", and that's usually the way it's meant as, "women and woman-ish gender identities". But it automatically also means inviting trans men and masculine presenting inter, non-binary and agender people into spaces where they are either forced to out themselves and explain themselves at every opportunity or where you're basically rubbing it into their faces if they do not pass and everybody just reads them as butch women.

Still better than "AFAB only housing" tho.

[-] Timberknave@hexbear.net 27 points 9 months ago

Getting jabbed with the chromosome reader before they let you into the AFAB fallout shelters

[-] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 40 points 9 months ago

Women and nonbinary people who can afford ubers pay for safety from men using the same feature that makes it easier for men to harass women and nonbinary people who have to drive uber.

I love these man-made horrors within my comprehension

[-] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 33 points 9 months ago

No, it says women and non-binary. Femby gang femby gang

[-] WittyProfileName2@hexbear.net 32 points 9 months ago

Woman+ is basically how a lot of lib "allies" will view NBs, (if they acknowledge them at all). There's this undercurrent of "if not man then woman" thought that lends to this sort transfeminine by default approach by people who don't care to educate themselves otherwise.

[-] WhoaSlowDownMaurice@hexbear.net 31 points 9 months ago

Gee, I'm sure my 6 ft masc-presenting self is what they're looking for in a driver right

[-] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 27 points 9 months ago

I'm assuming this would ideally be used by women who want woman Lyft drivers because there always is a concern that comes with male drivers. It doesn't look like it filters out male users and that probably opens it up for easy exploitation by men.

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 22 points 9 months ago

yeah why would the app have the passengers' gender listed? drivers can (and do) make assumptions about the names but letting either party filter for it is just a harassment tool

[-] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 18 points 9 months ago

It's a pretty lazy way to address a real issue without fixing anything. Can't say I expected much more from a tech company.

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 23 points 9 months ago

well they can't address the issue, it's literally contradictory to the business model. you want a safe, regulated environment for rider & driver? its called a fucking taxi

[-] GarfieldOfficial@hexbear.net 7 points 9 months ago

Sounds like the Kirghiz Soviet Socialist Republic to me

[-] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 14 points 9 months ago

Fuck that was literally a side plot on the sad horse show, that they founded an alternative to Uber with only female drivers after one of the characters complains about being harassed by a male driver. Then men start using the app to creep on the drivers, they replace all the drivers with strippers, and they sell the company for a huge profit and a feeling of guilt at having completely and utterly failed at what they set out to do in the first place.

[-] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 4 points 9 months ago

I am sympathetic as I remember that case where a male taxi driver was picking up, assulting, and murdering young women

obviously this company is going to fuck up its implementation

[-] KittyBobo@hexbear.net 25 points 9 months ago

What's the trade in value if I have the old model Women and I want to get the new Women+?

[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 20 points 9 months ago

Do they charge extra for this?

[-] Bloobish@hexbear.net 20 points 9 months ago

Truly there can be no horrifying outcomes from this by way of abuse from creeps filtering their victims...

[-] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 19 points 9 months ago

Women+ is after you've completed Women and you start over with all your skill points

lol. just throwing up their hands at the actual problem

[-] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 14 points 9 months ago

What the fuck?

[-] Wrongleverkrunk@lemm.ee 13 points 9 months ago

Easy just lost yourself as non b

[-] Sarcasmenul@hexbear.net 10 points 9 months ago

Yeah my brain just shuts off whenever i encounter this sort of cognitohazard tbh. Its like a safety protocol to preserve my sanity.

[-] WithoutFurtherBelay@hexbear.net 7 points 9 months ago

To be “fair”, they probably don’t want to spend the coding hours that would require differentiating from different non-binary people

this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
110 points (100.0% liked)

anti_cishet_aktion

2620 readers
14 users here now

A space for LGBTQIA+ people to express themselves.


RULES

  1. Familiarize yourself with the site-wide Code of Conduct

  2. Be nice to each other, no bigotry of any kind
    Bigotry includes transphobia, homophobia, aphobia, sexism, racism, ableism, etc. Hold each other accountable. If you see something, say something.

  3. Don't link to transphobia
    Please don't link to transphobia (or other bigotry), even if your personal intent is to challenge the bigotry in some way. Provide a content warning label in the title of your post where applicable.

  4. Be dank; don't be not-dank
    No liberalism, capitalist apologia, imperialism, etc.

  5. Harassment
    Cyber-stalking, harassment, and all other forms of threatening another comrade will result in removal.
    Threatening, inciting violence, and promoting harm to another comrade shall result in removal.

  6. No sexually explicit content
    As badly as some of us want to get saucy here, do not post sexually-explicit content that could reveal your personal or confidential information. Until there is a way this could be safely executed, all sexually-explicit posts will be removed to keep our comrades safe.

  7. Do not post NSFL Content
    It will be removed.

  8. We are not a crisis service
    We can't guarantee an immediate response. This does not mean no one cares. If you need to talk to someone at once, you may want to take a look at this directory of Hotline Numbers.
    If you need help but don’t feel comfortable making a post for any reason, please message the moderators. We will be glad to talk with you privately, or help in any other way that we can.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS