462
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 47 points 1 year ago

The lotto is an additional tax for people who don't understand math

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

A lot of people understand how unfair the math is, and still buy the tickets because "you never know."

Source: I buy tickets sometimes because you never know...

[-] verysoft@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you can afford it, then it's no harm really. I've made a profit from the lottery myself, albeit a minor one. Depending on the lottery, it's not the worst thing you can give pocket change away to for a bit of fun. So I never understood this "you'll never win" mentality/gatekeeping hobbies, people know the chances, but it's fun either way.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I think the big problem is that people who are addicted to gambling are being suckered several times a week. It's not really gambling, it's buying a daydream. If a casino gave you similar odds in one of their slots, it would likely be illegal based on the odds and the payout. So people who think of it like gambling are getting the worst of it. The expected value never approaches anything close to fair, even at rhe highest jackpots.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

people know the chances

This article agrees. Huge caveat:

…Osmond…obtained a database from the Connecticut Lottery containing 21 years' worth of winners. What did he find?

They are largely poor, largely minorities, and often addicts.

The lottery preys on these people.

Vox, “4 ways the lottery preys on the poor”, 2016

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Jonny@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I always feel it's more of a tax on hope. I know a few folks who play and the understand the odds very well... but what if!

'What if' can be very appealing for only £2, even if it is incredibly, incredibly, (repeat incredibly a thousand more times) unlikely.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SeeMinusMinus@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nixcamic@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

It's a quirk in statistics that buying a lottery ticket doesn't really statistically improve your chances of winning over not buying a ticket.

But like also your odds of winning with a ticket are infinitely higher than without.

[-] WereCat@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

I'll let you on a secret to increase your odds.

Since the chance to guess the correct numbers is so low that it's almost guaranteed you made a bad guess... Just change the guess to increase your odds.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I think that the fact that people don't believe you when you tell them that 1 2 3 4 5 6 has the exact same chance of winning than any other combination shows how bad we are with numbers , 1 2 3 4 5 6 is seen as something with very low odds of happening that is thought about as something that will never happen, but say 4 8 15 16 23 42 is seen as something that could happen anytime.

[-] AnagrammadiCodeina@feddit.it 9 points 1 year ago

But please don't move the island.

[-] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That's the combo to my luggage!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 year ago

You win every time you do not play the lottery.

You have more chance to play the lottery your whole life and never win a significant amount, than it is to win a significant amount once.

Since the lottery is a business, big part of all the ticket sales is used to run the business (and to generate profit). Only the rest is used to pay the winnings.

[-] Nath@aussie.zone 16 points 1 year ago

The lottery is run by the state government where I am, and all profits are put back into the community as grants.

Your odds of winning are just as awful, but at least you know your money isn't just making some rich people richer.

[-] qaz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

This seems to be more widespread than I thought! I assumed at least one of you were German. In Germany, Austria and Switzerland, there is a monopoly on lottery.

If the jackpot is up in the ridiculous set for life amounts, I'll drop ten bucks on a few tickets here or there. My thoughts doing so is this: if I lose ten bucks, then nothing really changes in my life, but if I'm truly lucky and hit that one in a quadrillion chance of actually winning the jackpot, then everything changes. I don't ever expect to win, but I won't miss the minimal amount of money I'm throwing in for my chance to. So why not bet on the long shot every now and again as long as losing doesn't hurt me financially?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Muninn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago

The way I see it, is that by never trying, I have statistically about the same chances of winning as someone playing.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Except their chances are infinitely higher than yours. It's miniscule, but miniscule and finite is infinitely bigger than zero. Math gets funky around the edge cases

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

I just ask them how much they spend on lotto every week, then times that by 52 and then ask roughly what they've won over the year, take that from the first number and show them how much money they've wasted. Sometimes it goes well, most times it doesn't, but they don't bother me about the lotto anymore.

[-] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You miss 100% of the shots you take.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] metaStatic@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

been meaning to do the math on this for a long time but never remember about it.

Turns out I saved $43,800 by not playing the local lottery every week since my first job.

potentially times that by seven because there seems to be a different lottery for every day of the week.

I'd like to check if my smartarse sequential number pick ever won in that time but finding the historical numbers is a bit more work than I could be bothered with right now.

[-] Delphia@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Depending on how your local lottery system works you probably would have had some minor wins over the years.

I have a $5 ticket every week. My logic is that "I'm renting hope" every week theres a minuscule chance that it could be my last week at work ever. I see a house that I'll never be able to afford and I think "Sure, if I win this week. Lol" as opposed to getting all shitty about wealth inequality.

[-] mayonaise_met@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago

Ah, so not only false hope but also crushing class consciousness.

[-] Delphia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Its not false hope, I'm aware that its stupidly unlikely but its not impossible. I dont think Ill ever win the jackpot but the idea that it could happen is worth $5 a week.

[-] mayonaise_met@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The idea that it could happen is false hope though, because you're buying into the idea that the chance is worth $5. The chance is so small it might as well be zero. So you're way over spending for a could that is practically a won't.

There are some situations with some lotteries where the math works in your favor because of for instance rollover. But if you're committed to $5 a week you're not that lottery player.

If you were to put $5 in S&P 500 weekly for a decade it is far more likely that you'll have a profit of a few thousand on top of the money that you did not spend on lottery tickets (because you still own the stock). That's not really as radically marxist as my previous comment might make me seem, but for your personal wallet it's way better.

In this economy if you want to become rich, the best thing is to start out rich. The next best thing is starting a company and pocketing the productivity of your employees. Back to that marxism thing again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Put that $5 in an index fund and pretend you won $10,000 in 20 years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I buy a lotto ticket when the Powerball gets ridiculous. Probably won't win, but I definitely won't if I don't get a ticket. A few bucks every year is worth that improvement from zero to non-zero.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ExLisper@linux.community 9 points 1 year ago

If someone thinks about playing lottery just tell them to bet on '1 2 3 4 5 6' (or whatever the number of numbers in your lottery). Once you realize this combination is as probable as any other the chances of winning seem a lot smaller.

[-] Cosmicomical@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That is true, but as a side note i discourage you from betting on that sequence as a lot of people that studied probability end up betting on that same sequence out of spite and if it actually comes out the winnings will be much lower than expected.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] niktemadur@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'd rather see what Joshua the AI from "War Games" (the movie) has to say about all this...

A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I bet you can't win the lottery if you do play - care to bet on it?

[-] GrammatonCleric@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I can never get STDs if I stay a virgin forever.

Checkmate, antibiotics manufacturers.

[-] Johanno@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

I once calculated the chance of winning the pot if you pay 10 million in tickets. It was about 50%

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

we did it in school it's basic math from how many numbers how many do you need to guess correctly, they can arbitrarily set those numbers to always be more than the population.

IIRC in my country where the population is around 5 million the odds of winning the lottery was about 1 in 6,5 million and in the neighboring country with 10 million people it was around 1 in 13 million

[-] rmuk@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago

If you're in the UK and you - or anyone you know - plays the lottery, look into Premium Bonds instead. You get the same excitement during the draw and the worst case scenario is you get your money back.

Yes, I know there are better investments, but Premium Bonds have some of the fun of the lottery without just pissing your cash away.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Statistically you can’t win by playing either

[-] NewPerspective@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

"You can't win the lotto and you are playing."

[-] runeko@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

You are very slightly less likely to win the lotto if you don't buy a ticket.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

My lottery is open 9:30-4 mon-fri and its called the NYSE.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Enzy@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

laughs in poor

[-] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

Sounds like someone who doesn't play

[-] Makeshift@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I guess my crappy raffle luck as a kid paid off. Learned young that putting hope in a gamble isn’t worth it.

Nowadays I have a fun little mantra to tell people in my circle: If I’m willing to make a bet, you might not want to take it. I’m not the gambling type. I probably know something.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
462 points (95.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27191 readers
4190 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS