this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
181 points (99.5% liked)

Canada

9078 readers
1510 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

First time home buyers will not be charged GST (5%) when buying a home, as long as the place they're buying costs less than $1M. This means that people buying a home for the first time will save up to $50k on their purchase.

Edit: Note, GST is mostly only charged when buying newly built homes, so this won't have any effect for people buying used homes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Just like any form of investment, diversifying is important. If someone is 100% invested in Loblaws stock, do you expect the government to defend Loblaws to protect their investment just because they're relying on that to retire? The people made the choice to depend on a single volatile investment to retire, it means they took a chance that its value could drop.

Hell, it could happen for a bunch of other reasons, one bad neighbor fucking up their lot and your home loses value.

[–] Dtules@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Yeah, Boomers getting special protections is kind of annoying.

A generation of millenials were told to go to post secondary no matter the cost and then when we did and incurred a ton of debt but the good jobs that were promised to us weren't there, the reaction was "oops, oh well, get fucked I guess".

Maybe if we stopped funneling a billion dollars into "managing" our CPP plan into poorer performance and used that money to increase CPP payouts instead, boomers could afford more of a hit on their housing.

I do wonder if another large contributing factor is that most of our MPs have conflicts of interest when it comes to the real estate market.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

Not to burst your bubble buddy but it's not just boomers who reaped the benefits, the X and Y generations did as well. Many millennials are over 40 with a career, a house, a family, all the typical stuff boomers are known for. I'm under 40 and already sold a condo for profit and we sold a cottage for profit which allowed us to buy a bungalow that we can afford on a single income and that will be paid in by the time we turn 50.

[–] Dtules@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

lol Were you just looking for a comment so you could flex about your property deals?

Personally, I'm a millennial and I'm okay -- we recently sold our starter home and we got way more than we were expecting for it. But it didn't make me feel "smart" it made me feel gross that the market seems so rigged.

I'm not talking about individuals, I'm talking about trends. The priority for housing should first and foremost be to house people.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

No, I'm just saying that people might be complaining but millennials in general are way better off than those who came after them. If you look at wealth stats the average makes that plenty clear and I just gave my experience as a counter example to everyone that's complaining. Average background, still made it out comfortably.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)