this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
170 points (98.3% liked)

Science Memes

20550 readers
1634 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 94 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Every person in the world with a net worth over $1B USD. Then I'd equally reallocate their money across every human on earth.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 45 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Rather than re-allocating their money across every human on earth, why not allocate it inversely proportional to the net worth of the recipient (and maybe also local currency conversion rate), to uplift the poorest folks?

Could probably choose a lower number, too - say, $100M. Nobody needs anywhere remotely close to that.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 21 points 3 days ago

The economics of unlucky Mario Party spaces

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

I just realized that the realty market always runs a drought to up its sale price. Also, since homeless also don’t have housing, there’s an even greater housing shortage than just those seeking to move into a “forever home.”

[–] bratwurstest@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 days ago

Yeah 100M feels right. Also, wealth is usually tied up in non liquid assets, and it makes no sense to either force liquidation even if it crashes the value, or divide ownership equally among 9 billion people. Each asset needs to be re-allocated on a case by case basis. Like, the private international bridge in Detroit, it's much more valuable as a single asset than the steel scrap it could be sold for.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Seems like an arbitrary threshold. Does anybody actually need $900 million? Or $300 million? Or...

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago

Yes, I'm in dire need of $999,999,999.99 but of course I don't need any more than that, thank you

[–] harambe69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's just gonna drive up inflation. Instead, invest that into better farms, industries, businesses, and schools that provide services at-cost or free. Or just use the assets left by those guys for the public good, they're already set up.

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Or better yet, send the money with them.

[–] UsefulInfoPlz@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I’d rather make sure everyone has everything they need for at least basic life. Healthcare, education, infrastructure to name a few. Food for schools. I know a lot of countries already have this. But many don’t even have access to clean water. Ideally worldwide. And throw corrupt politicians and military overlords in there. Although many of them would be counted in the >$1b. Get rid of the religious wackjobs and maybe we could start progressing as a species.

[–] craftrabbit@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

Using Hawking radiation!

[–] espurr@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

B-but billionaires have rights too!!

[–] jlow@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They can stop being billionaires by giving away that money anytime they want to not go into the black hole.

[–] espurr@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago

OMG that's actually fair