this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
861 points (99.7% liked)

Science Memes

19460 readers
1966 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] y0kai@anarchist.nexus 45 points 3 months ago (4 children)

just armor the whole plane dammit they're already heavier than air!

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 39 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Actually, it turns out the best strategy is to strip the plane's armor - light planes need less fuel, which makes them even lighter, and that makes them faster. Fast planes spend less time in enemy airspace, on top of being harder to hit.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The survivability onion: 1 don't get seen, 2 don't get hit, 3 don't get damaged, 4 don't get killed

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You forgot zero: don't be there.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The principles are usually about the machine itself, rather than overall war strategy, but sure, if you can do something without risking stuff and people, that's better.

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean, you could argue that "spend less time in enemy territory" counts for this.

[–] xspurnx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's the tactic my goth girlfriend employees. It has its downsides.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Aw fuck I just realized I'm my wife's goth girlfriend I feel so fetishized

[–] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Negative two: don't think

huh? Well...This relies on the quote "I think, therefore I am," but if I'd led with that, I'd be putting Descartes before the horse.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

also... the Mossie used less critical resources which meant they could build more of them. and the plywood construction may have been harder to spot on radar.

[–] kossa@feddit.org 4 points 3 months ago

Here's my strategic assessment: the best option is to large scale infiltrate your enemy before air raids and let the infiltrators put potatos into the air defence systems barrel's. 🥔 gg, ez.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Or make the whole thing out of whatever the black box recorder is made of. Problem solved!

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

i read in a science article that they're made of this weird thing called atoms. can we put some of those in planes?

[–] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Just slice thinner

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

that's exactly why birds evolved to have scales!

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

But...ohhhh...

[–] anothercatgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago

spinlaunch and Longshot Space seem to have some ideas in that regard