this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
588 points (99.5% liked)

Europe

8227 readers
1403 users here now

News and information from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

AI-generated videos promoting Poland's exit from the European Union have appeared on Polish-language social media, featuring non-existent, attractive young women advocating for "Polexit".

One TikTok account called "Prawilne Polki" published content showing women dressed in T-shirts bearing Polish flags and patriotic symbols, European analytics collective Res Futura said. The content targeted audiences aged 15 to 25.

The videos featured statements including: "I want Polexit because I want freedom of choice, even if it will be more expensive. I don't remember Poland before the European Union, but I feel it was more Polish then."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Avicenna@programming.dev 79 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

I think the appropriate response to this is to make AI videos of beatiful russian women telling russians to revolt against Putin

[โ€“] slaacaa@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

The appropriate response is sending more weapons and ammo to Ukraine

[โ€“] Hirom@beehaw.org 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No need for AI slop. There are already young russian women speaking loudly against Putin. What is lacking is the ability for opponents to have their voice heard in Russia.

[โ€“] Kornblumenratte@feddit.org 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The Pussy Riot "girls" are in their thirties, approaching forty. They are exiled and declared to be a terrorist organisation. And they are feminists and Punk. Wonderful, strong, independent women.

If you want to use sex to sell the idea of a breakup of the Russian empire to Russian men, I'm not sure whether Pussy Riot will work.

[โ€“] Hirom@beehaw.org 2 points 20 hours ago

Thirty is young enough, but if younger people want to speak then it's great. I hope it'd more convincing to have real humans speak out than bots.

Russians opposing Putin are eventually declared extremist and either in exile, poisoned, or sent to prison.

So the only persons alive and able to openly critize Putin are outside Russia.

[โ€“] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Besides of the "This is the weapon of the enemy" frame from The Dark Knight Returns, let me remind you who runs and trains these AI models. They want the EU gone. At best, you'll be shoveling money into it, at worst your IP will be terminated for "spam".

[โ€“] Siegfried@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They thought pushing UK out of the EU would break it And we grew stronger than ever.

[โ€“] qarbone@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Poland's exit isn't the breaking of the EU. It's proving a plan of attack that will break it.

Slowly chipping away at the edges. Attacking country by country with misinformation until every country is isolated again, ruled by whatever oligarch decides to set up shop there.

The point of a union is the united effort. If you start thinking in terms of what parts you can cut out without issue or to "grow stronger" then you might as well stop the charade and pick who's running the new empire.

[โ€“] Grass@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

didn't it only benefit like 5 wealthy shitstains?

At least one of which offshored his operations shortly afterwards.

[โ€“] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If I lived in Russia, I probably wouldn't want to fight a civil war. I'd just leave.

I think that the problem that the Kremlin is going to face isn't a civil war, but a combination of population leaving and having a hard time attracting immigration. Like, sure, the people in power get control of mines and oil wells and such, but they're going to erode the country with policies like this.

[โ€“] vga@sopuli.xyz 3 points 22 hours ago

All the best people left Russia already a decade ago.

[โ€“] Elchi@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago

Not the Ai War we deserve, but the Ai War we need.

[โ€“] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

i mean, guess the environment is in the crossfire now.

[โ€“] Avicenna@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

fair enough but maybe they will stop this stupidity if they realize it is very easy for this to backfire

[โ€“] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

Oh, no-no-no, they will not stop, and on top of it they will not realise it is easy to backfire. If anything I would expect them to double down, and even after revolt, if it ever comes their way, they will be puzzled as to what could've been wrong

[โ€“] absentbird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

War never changes.

[โ€“] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know if I should be happy or sad that this doesn't seem to be a thing yet.

[โ€“] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sad. It's pathetic that our society is captured by oligarchs that appreciate the brainwashing and have no desire to counter it.

If only one side is willing to use a weapon, only one side can see the value in negotiating it off the table. Russia needs a reason to agree to stop, and using these methods to topple Putin gets us closer to that discussion, but that would mean acknowledging the use of similar practices by corpo-fascists domestically.

[โ€“] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The easiest solution is to have the USA annex Russia. That stops the tomfoolery that Russia exerts in every area, including the US.

[โ€“] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I don't want Russia.

Geographically, the US has the benefit of distance from other major powers, and that would in part go away. Russia already blows a bunch of money trying to secure the Far East by getting Russians to live out there.

Russia has a shit-load of problems that have to be solved, from political to AIDS epidemic.

We can already get population while filtering out people who don't want to be here by just allowing immigration. Annex something and you have to fight the people who don't want to be there. Immigration is a much better way to get people.

Russia has natural resources, but we have most of the same ones already in North America, and they aren't that valuable; resource extraction isn't most of our economy.

[โ€“] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not easy at all with their useful idiot in the whitehouse.

[โ€“] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

You're right, the whole republican arm of our government supports Russia. However, Russia is both the ripest it has ever been and the most vulnerable it has ever been.