219
submitted 5 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Alabama, unless stopped by the courts, intends to strap Kenneth Eugene Smith to a gurney Thursday and use a gas mask to replace breathable air with nitrogen, depriving him of oxygen, in the nation’s first execution attempt with the method.

The Alabama attorney general’s office told federal appeals court judges last week that nitrogen hypoxia is “the most painless and humane method of execution known to man.” But what exactly Smith, 58, will feel after the warden switches on the gas is unknown, some doctors and critics say.

“What effect the condemned person will feel from the nitrogen gas itself, no one knows,” Dr. Jeffrey Keller, president of the American College of Correctional Physicians, wrote in an email. “This has never been done before. It is an experimental procedure.”

Keller, who was not involved in developing the Alabama protocol, said the plan is to “eliminate all of the oxygen from the air” that Smith is breathing by replacing it with nitrogen.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 93 points 5 months ago

How about stop murdering people

[-] Odelay42@lemmy.world 60 points 5 months ago

I don't know why this is still a controversial concept. Just don't kill prisoners. Horrific crimes are not assuaged by more death. It's never worked in history and it doesn't work now.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

It’s arguably controversial because the human brain has a cognitive bias toward vengeance. There are lot of really interesting psych studies on this topic. It feels right to take an eye for an eye, and we often try to justify that urge, even if we don’t benefit from it.

[-] Odelay42@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The human brain has a lot of cognitive biases that we have collectively decided to legislate against.

This is one of the easiest to move on from. It takes significantly more effort to justify and carry out judicial murder than it does to ban it.

We banned dueling to the death over honor centuries ago, and that's a very similar cognitive bias. Arguably a lot less impactful on society at large too, since a duel requires 2 willing participants and by definition has no collateral consequences, but it was still deemed wrong ages ago. There is no clear argument killing someone for their alleged crimes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] squiblet@kbin.social 13 points 5 months ago

It’s pretty arbitrary, too. A guy in a town I lived in killed his wife with a knife in front of their kids, and was sentenced to 40 years. This guy helped kill someone, served 35 years, and they still want execute him on top of it.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 87 points 5 months ago

We actually do know the effect of breathing nitrogen gas. It's a hell of a lot better than injecting someone with a drug cocktail. I don't agree with the death penalty but this is about as humane as the death penalty gets.

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago

Exactly. They make it sound as if nobody ever got exposed to low oxygen atmospheres. Absurd. Just the stories of divers is so so much. You feel absolutely nothing and then it goes black. Real simple.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 13 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I’m sick of the media drama about this dude. I don’t think they should execute him but there’s nothing that novel or cruel about the method.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] stoly@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Yes, apoxia is the way to go if you have to.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 76 points 5 months ago

“What effect the condemned person will feel from the nitrogen gas itself, no one knows,” Dr. Jeffrey Keller, president of the American College of Correctional Physicians, wrote in an email. “This has never been done before. It is an experimental procedure.”

We do, in fact, know what a person feels from nitrogen suffocation, and we know because nitrogen suffocation happens accidentally with some degree of regularity from workers that don't follow proper safety protocols.

At first you feel out of breath, but you don't feel panic from it; it's like exhaling everything in your lungs, and then breathing in solely from a helium filled balloon (which I'm guessing most people have tried). You feel slightly high and light headed because the oxygen in your bloodstream is rapidly depleted; you are hypoxic. As you take a second and third breath, your vision tunnels, and you pass out. Your body has a mechanism to detect a dangerous buildup of carbon dioxide in your blood, but since you're expelling the CO2 with every breath out, and breathing nitrogen back in, that panic response doesn't get tripped.

Nitrogen suffocation has been a preferred choice for right-to-die advocates.

We can argue about how the death penalty is applied, and whether it should exist at all (I believe it should, but is almost always inappropriate), but there's no serious argument about whether nitrogen suffocation is a good or bad way to die. The people continuously fighting against this execution are fighting the method because they've lost all their other avenues to prevent the execution; attempting to call this process 'untested'--when it's been tested by a large number of people using it to end their own lives, and tested via industrial accidents--is the only option that they have left to prevent this execution.

[-] astral_avocado@lemm.ee 27 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Thank you, I've been wondering why we're suddenly seeing all this hub bub around nitrogen execution when it's 100% obviously a better method than the barbaric injected cocktail that regularly fails. Thought I was taking crazy pills.

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Lethal injection performs as it was designed to: it's agony. You're paralyzed, then given a heart attack.

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Done correctly, lethal injection is quite humane. We do it with pets; you administer a strong sedative, and then you use an overdose of a barbiturate to stop the heart (which is not the same as a heart attack). But that's **not **how lethal injections are typically done in the US, esp. since pharmaceutical companies don't want to sell their medications to prisons to be used to execute prisoners; that was because anti-death penalty advocates found ways to put pressure on drug companies. But how do you stop the sale of nitrogen to a prison? I can literally go buy a tank from any welding supply company.

Edit: the sedative is used to prevent feelings of fear or panic when the heart stops.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 63 points 5 months ago

IMHO, executions don’t make sense given the amount of innocent people that we keep finding on death row.

It makes even less sense given that we need to have a long expensive, and highly imperfect, appellate process to double check that we’re not killing innocent people.

Also, we don’t really have any good data to support the claim that the death penalty deters people from committing terrible crimes. People that are going to do something -that- bad are usually going to do it.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 39 points 5 months ago

We know exactly what happens when people experience nitrogen hypoxia. They get confused, then they lose consciousness, then die only if deprived of oxygen for quite some time.

We know because many people have experienced it and survived (because the oxygen was switched back on). I personally know someone who experienced this in a controlled test with the military.

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 36 points 5 months ago

You know what would be more humane?

Not killing people.

[-] boogetyboo@aussie.zone 9 points 5 months ago

Agreed. I don't know how you can consider yourself a modern civilization while still putting people to death. It's barbaric.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 35 points 5 months ago

Abolish capital punishment. The US is such a freakin' primitive country in so many ways.

[-] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I don't know man, some people really, really deserve to be removed from existence:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Garavito

How can you reform someone who raped, tortured, killed and then raped again (while dead) more than 100 minors?

Put yourself in the position of a father who knows this guy raped his kid, then tortured him with mutilation, and then raped the corpse.

Imagine knowing that this person is in jail, probably getting decent food and watching TV... Probably jerking off to the memories of the mutilated body parts of your child... while you have to live knowing he is still there.

[-] theonyltruemupf@feddit.de 11 points 5 months ago

Revenge is not a good motive though. It doesn't bring those children back. Removing people like him from society while not forgetting our humanity is all we can do.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 5 months ago

Don't critics always and only raise doubts? How about making the article about what experts say instead of critics?

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

While I abhor the death penalty, the science is pretty solid on nitrogen being more humane from a medical perspective. What gives someone the feeling of suffocation is excessive CO2, not the lack of oxygen.

It's actually a problem with closed-circuit rebreathers. If the CO2 scrubber keeps working but the Oxygen tank runs empty, the person on the rebreather will feel fine until they pass out.

The worst thing for the victim in the execution will be the psychological horror from wearing the mask and knowledge of what's happening. If they're goikg to do this, they should just change out the air in a sealed chamber while the victim sleeps.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago

I want to recap the long sequence of events that has led up to this point:

  1. In the beginning of this narrative, every death penalty state was doing lethal injections with a three drug protocol.
  2. Italy and maybe some other European nations start arresting pharmaceutical executives and charging them with murder, because their drugs are being used for these lethal injections in the United States.
  3. Drug companies stop selling their drugs to state penitentiaries. States are not able to perform executions.
  4. Death penalty states start amending their protocols to switch to different drugs and sometimes a single dose barbiturate protocol.
  5. Those drugs become harder and harder to source. Pharma companies become completely unwilling to dispense the drugs at all. State legislatures start allowing corrections officials to change the protocol without amending state law, in an effort to keep up.
  6. States resort to buying drugs from shady compounding pharmacies in secret. Having prison guards write dosage protocols turns out to have been a bad idea. Because, guess what, anesthesiologists are a highly compensated medical specialty, because what they do is highly complicated. So some exit l executions are botched, which delays things even more.
  7. It's in this environment that this nitrogen idea migrates from internet boards into the state legislatures.

The big picture here is that if execution remains legal, but you take away all the options, death penalty states will go looking for alternative options.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 25 points 5 months ago

I'm not sure why people obsess over the method. It distracts from the act itself.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

It kills innocent people, and the appeal process that we put in place, to try our best not to kill innocent people, costs a shit load of money. Money we could spend on other things we desperately need. Oh, and studies show that it doesn’t deter people.

The only thing it really does is satiate our amygdala’s ancient bias for vengeance. Our biology tells us that it feels right, but the data shows that individuals and societies don’t really benefit from it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

The distraction is the point. By making the execution look less grotesque, they believe it will make it more palatable to their mouth-breathing constituents. They want the delusion of the condemned drifting off to sleep to slake their bloodlust without their pesky consciences feeling the guilt.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 months ago

I think we need to go and get sharks with freaking lazer beams attached to their heads

[-] deft@lemmy.wtf 9 points 5 months ago

Too many innocent people ending up on Death Row is a fault of how easily we condemn people to death.

That said, the death penalty should still exist.

We absolutely unequivocally know Dahmer did it. To death.

We 100% without question know Trump attempted to overthrow American law, prove it in court. To death.

We absolutely without question know Saddam Hussein, Adolf Hitler, Vladimir Putin are pieces of shit and committed, in my opinion, crimes against humanity. Prove it in court. To death.

I see no problem with the death penalty or this method only what we consider justifiable for death.

I think life without parole is more evil than the death penalty, life without parole also encourages horrid behavior in prison because what more will they do to you?

[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 5 months ago

Did they get the idea from the Sarco Pod (AKA the Swiss Suicide Booth)? I know inert gas deaths aren't a new concept but it seems like an odd coincidence since the pod was just making news a couple years ago.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] seukari@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

There's a great Jacob Geller video about how methods of execution have evolved and why they've evolved.

I wouldn't do it justice but it points out how every time we make a 'more humane' way of killing it often just reduces the person's ability to show suffering, rather than reducing the suffering itself. In many cases the suffering is increased as we say the method is less barbaric; a firing squad has the highest success rate and likely the fastest death.

I can't recommend this enough https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eirR4FHY2YY Piped bot do your thing

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
219 points (93.6% liked)

News

21821 readers
5267 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS