172

“People in our caucus… to me, they’re not really taking this as serious as we should,” Tuberville said. “American people need to wake up. This is a war; this is a war on our Constitutional rights, our constitutional republic. This is not as much about Donald Trump as it is about the people in this country.”

Tuberville also claimed that Democrats were “anti”-American, insisting that the liberal party was looking to strip citizens of their privacy and censorship rights while conveniently forgetting that it was Republican leadership who pushed through the reauthorization of a domestic spy program in April and who are continuing to press for literary censorship in majority conservative states such as Florida.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] teft@lemmy.world 53 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What's the issue they have with this verdict? It was handed down by a jury of 12 of his peers. One of them was even a follower of his on Truth social. Unanimous on all 34 counts. So again I ask, what is the issue?

[-] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

I read that the "Truth Social" juror actually just read posts on Twitter/X where he saw reposts about what he said on TS... and that he wasn't actually a follower on that platform. Could be wrong, but thought I should point that out.

But yes, what problem do they have on the verdict? Either he and others of his ilk are lying or they really believe in conspiracies.

[-] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

by a jury of 12 of his peers

You dare suggest the God Emperor has peers?!

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

The issue is they’re traitor cunts.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

the issue is that it was against their Orange Fuhrer.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Conservatives don't believe they have peers. They think we're all Serfs

[-] unmagical@lemmy.ml 52 points 1 month ago

I didn't realize I had a constitutional right to commit fraud.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Unless you're a wealthy Republican, you don't.

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Exactly, and I bet you feel fucking stupid as shit now. Don't you?

Well, I'm not getting left behind this time. No fucking way.

I'm not waiting for the SCOTUS ruling to get in on this action. I've already got the ball rolling on all types of fraudulent and criminal financial dealings.

What's the opposite of a statute of limitations?

[-] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

An NRA sticker and thin blue line somewhere on your pickup truck whisks that pesky statute away

[-] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Or a constitutional right to censorship.

[-] user91@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

This fucker needs a slappin'

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

then a tossing.(preferably from a very high window.)

[-] zcd@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I wouldn’t wish that on my worst enemy.

Not that trump could toss his own salad.

[-] Late2TheParty@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

If it helps, I live in a high-rise.

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

I love how they've been on various witch hunts for decades yet they can still somehow pretend that they have anything left that would escalate their 'war'.

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

If you're looking for an actual war, maybe it was a bad idea to fuck over a lot of military officers with your pointless grandstanding. I doubt they have forgotten that their promotions were held hostage to your theatrics.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What was the fox news host quote "This was an act of lawfare"? Dumbasses all around.

Edit: Yup, it was Laura Ingram.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Tuberville's Stupid

Pretty much covers it.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 10 points 1 month ago
[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 9 points 1 month ago

When are we going to stop playing nice, and treat these people like the domestic terrorists that they are? If we continue to let them throw our tolerance back in our faces without any serious consequences, they’ll make our democracy an even bigger joke than it already is.

We’re not. The call is coming from inside the house.

[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Good thing it's not a real war or his obstruction of military promotions would have helped weaken them when they're needed. Tuberville doesn't care about anything but himself.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

It's weird how even the lowest of low-info can be trained to believe that because the felon Ronald McDonald was convicted for his felonies, that it's an attack on....checks notes...."the people in this country".

[-] Argongas@kbin.social 5 points 1 month ago

I mean he's kinda right, but he just doesn't realize he's on the side threatening America.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Oh, here we just call it a "tuberville response", the "stupid" is implied.

this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
172 points (95.3% liked)

politics

18129 readers
3632 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS