85
submitted 1 month ago by original_reader@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml

It's in the eye of the beholder, of course. But it would be great to see some solid recommendations.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 65 points 1 month ago

The distribution doesn't to too much, its mostly the desktop environment. I like the look of KDE Plasma the most. But usually I craft my own look after a while.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 month ago

I like the look of KDE Plasma the most.

GNOME vs KDE gang fight has been summoned.

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 18 points 1 month ago

The look of GNOME isn't the problem of GNOME. ;-) I'm not a good citizen right now.

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 month ago

Absolutely. GNOME often looks better, but it just doesnt work. Basic things everywhere are removed or not added.

[-] dallen@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

One man’s “basic” things are another man’s clutter …

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago

So you mean...

  • editing images (in the viewer, screenshot tool)
  • being allowed to customize the UI of any app
  • changing the login screen (gdm) background
  • creating a textfile from the filemanager
  • editing .desktop entries graphically
  • ...

?

Hahaha, I disagree

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Well GNOME has issues but in terms of look it's 69420x better than KDE.

[-] pukeko@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

The thing I've learned in the many years of watching this fight is that the things Gnome people (of which I am one, though I have immense respect and appreciation for the KDE project) don't like about KDE tend to be the things KDE people like about KDE and vice versa.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br 10 points 1 month ago

Agreed. I think it's not about distros we should have pay attention, but desktop environments.

And about "most appealing" DE I think it's subjective. Surely KDE has the most flexible structure and may be exactly what you want, but Gnome is also appealing for some people (myself included).

Again, there is no right or wrong, just personal preferences

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 64 points 1 month ago

I don't think it's the distros job to look visually appealing. That's the job of the desktop environment. Seriously I wish distributions would just ship vanilla desktop environments. All of the themed variants always have some issues. Maybe I'm just old and stubborn but that's my opinion.

[-] secret300 13 points 1 month ago

Fuckin same. It took so long for me to realize a lot of issues I had wasn't because gnome was shit, it was because every distro fucks with gnome until it's unusable. I finally tried fedora and now gnome is my favorite DE and I love the workflow.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ssm 47 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Definitely OpenBSD's default fvwm

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago
[-] original_reader@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

TempleOS received mostly "sympathetic" reviews.

😅

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago

Does OpenBSD really default to FVWM in 2024? Metal.

[-] ssm 4 points 1 month ago

Yes, and not even the modern fvwm3, due to licensing issues.

[-] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 4 points 1 month ago

A blast of the past.

[-] pelotron@midwest.social 25 points 1 month ago

Garuda Hyprland edition. All the neon-RGB styling of Garuda gamer on top of Hyprland's smooth UI.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

Upvoted. I forgot about this distro. I don't like its neon style at all but it's something different and pleasing for some people.

[-] pelotron@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago

It's finally an opinionated distro I agree with. Of course you can get anything to look like anything but I just like how they picked a path and went so far down it to make their own unique out-of-the-box experience.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 month ago

You're asking about the desktop environment and its default settings, which may or may not be the same on any given distro.

But I have a tie between Plasma and Cinnamon (mint's DE). They both take only minor tweaking to get where I want them, and I can use them both out of the box with zero complaints.

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

Many distros customize the colour schemes and theming of their desktops. The out-of-the-box XFCE in EOS looks nothing at all like vanilla XFCE for example.

[-] myopic_menace@reddthat.com 22 points 1 month ago

The new COSMIC desktop by System76 and Pop!_OS is very promising. I've been running the pre-alpha, and have been very impressed.

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

The current pop_os dark is already pretty damn good, it's a very refined theme

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HouseWolf@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

EndeavourOS has a pretty nice colour scheme and wallpaper going by default.

If I was forced to use a default distro look, it would be that or Linux Mint probably.

[-] kenkenken@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago
[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Fedora Workstation. Gnome is pretty great on the eyes, and there's a healthy Libadwaita apps ecosystem that is just *chefs kiss*

ElementaryOS also looks great for the system and core apps, although there's not really a third party app ecosystem that fits with the Pantheon theme, unfortunately.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Father_Redbeard@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago

Pop!_OS

Gnome with a bit of a macOS twist. I really like it. I'm excited for Cosmic!

[-] olafurp@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I think GNOME looks very visually appealing with it's consistency. The Libadwaita library has a nice aesthetic and looks very clean with nice spacing for elements to "breathe".

I still prefer KDE since I can tailor the look to my needs and I prefer to have clutter over extra clicks. (I have top bar with "Opened programs", Launcher, System tray, Time and a global menu and KWin script for managing Activities)

I feel like modern era of design has gone a bit overboard with the "clean" direction. It can be contrasted with Windows XP where you click "All programs" and you literally get all programs in the start menu with options of how to run or open them. I prefer to do "Menu" - > "Submenu" - > "Thing I want".

Come to think of it I should probably make a launcher for KDE.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 9 points 1 month ago

deepin or zorin

[-] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 8 points 1 month ago

Linux Mint has a smooth, out-of-your-way look & feel to either MATE or Cinnamon that just makes me feel at home

[-] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 month ago

You mean Desktop?

Distro, I think Lubuntu does LXQt better than Fedora LXQt.

But LXQt is a huge mix of mostly KDE Theming.

[-] Tixanou@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

Garuda Linux looks very nice

[-] WhiteBerry@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Honestly, whilst I would not recommend this at all, I find CutefishOS (you could argue it doesn't even need to be a distro) incredibly visually appealing.

Perhaps I will get downvoted for being a sucker for modern visuals, but the theme is consistent, simple and easy on my eyes.

Although I like GNOME, the consistency bothers me and some of the design choices are inconsistent and don't make for a great user experience, looking at Nautilus for example.

[-] Thorned_Rose@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Pantheon desktop (Elementary OS)

[-] scytale@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

As one comment mentioned, it depends more on the DE. But out of the box, I’d say Peppermint, Elementary, and Mint.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ulu_mulu@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

LMDE (Mint Cinnamon)

[-] kionite231@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

Xerolinux. It's basically a heavily themed KDE

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Hmm there is stuff like Archcraft (maybe it has a different name now idk) that is made specifically for visuals. In terms of usable distros I'd say Xero is the best I know. It seems to be discontinued though. CachyOS has some nice WM setups too but the appealing visuals can't be consistent in that case because they are not full DEs and the unreasonably tiny calendar pop-up window from Xfce always ruins everything.

[-] Mars2k21@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Really depends on the desktop but in terms of default desktops that are shipped with distros I'm picking Fedora's GNOME (pretty much stock) and MX Linux's XFCE.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You mean the default setup of the desktop?

...Reminds me of this.

[-] pukeko@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Out of the box, I love Vanilla OS's color scheme and wallpaper, with Fedora in second place for a default Gnome environment. I like the Pop_OS theme. I use River WM with a gruvbox theme (Vivaldi with no open tabs pictured), which is about as far from out of the box as you can get. Incidentally, I've been team light theme forEVER, but I've switched with gruvbox.

desktop screenshot

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

Distros aren't going to be visually appealing as they typically and just standard desktops or CLI

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

My favourite looking DE is GNOME with the WhiteSur theme and SF-Pro system font

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
85 points (90.5% liked)

Linux

46611 readers
1249 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS