brave of boebert to fight a battle of wits while unarmed
Going for that pacifist achievement.
Bobo couldn't win a battle of wits with a damp sponge.
Are you ready kids???
Aye aye captain!
WHOOOOOO debates like a pineapple under the sea?
BOBO FUCKWIT!
Who jerks a guy off in a theatre indecently?
BOBO FUCKWIT!
If christofascist bullshit be something you wish
BOBO FUCKWIT
She'll drop her face in your lap and blub like a fish!
She’s as smart as she is tall
That's that's not her IQ, it's the temperature outside. 80°, with 95% humidity to make things extra unbearable.
Lauren Boebert couldn't win a battle of wits with a spoonful of guacamole.
Or the spoon.
The guacamole just gave the spoon an unfair advantage.
She's very weird.
Weren't she and like ten other top, younger GOP candidates and influencers formerly models with no interest in politics until someone apparently started paying them to share extreme rhetoric instead of whatever the fuck they used to get up to?
Very, very weird.
Crazy story about how boebert, candace owens, tomi lahren and more of that type of vapid, gop agent of chaos - all started on a sketchy "modeling agency" website (which seems like it's also used as an escort service potentially) called "explore talent"?
It shows some of these "political pundits" in revealing, suggestive poses and is run by an Israeli pornographer with ties to organized crime (Name is Ami Shafrir and he is suspected/accused of some other pretty serious stuff).
Here are some of the photos that were captured (with watermark):
Here's boebert (this photo really shows you her roots as the illegitimate daughter of a deadbeat amateur wrestler from Florida).
And I guess, until recently at least, candice owens' whole profile was still up.
There's always another layer to these cartoon villains and their evil, desperation and ignorance.
This isn't an article, it's a Twitter thread.
Convenient for those of us who don’t have Twitter accounts
Most people will lose a battle of wits with Petey B. He's friggin' quick and incredibly intelligent.
Boebert would lose a battle of wits with a rock though.
She loses battles of wit with herself nonstop, publicly. I think we're safe.
No surprise, I'm fairly certain that she loses battles of wits regularly with small animals and house plants.
I think she could beat a slice of bread with some effort.
Only if it’s sitting next to her in the theater though.
She is definitely the sausage beating champion in that scenario.
As much as I hate to speak in defense of her, I have, on occasion, been outsmarted by pets.
She'd lose battle of wits against a stuffed iguana. She's essentially unarmed
They call me Cuban Pete!
Was also thinking, "LET ME SHOW YOU SOMETHING!!!"
(Image: Lauren Boebert's face from post thumbnail-- ¾ angle. She has a very forced, mostly terrifying smile. The image is edited with a crudely drawn witch hat and text reads, "I'll grope you my pretty, and your little dog too".)
I like when she fails, but that was weak sauce and I feel robbed of my time for having read that.
Play to your strengths. Stick to giving handies.
Why was she never charged with indecency? Weren't there kids around? Caught on camera, in a public space.
And, can IQ scores run in the negative?
Bimboert couldn't win a battle of wits against a toilet brush.
She'd try and blow the handle
Of course Boebert lost. She went into battle unarmed.
She doesn't even qualify has a half wit.
She should probably stick to beetlejuicing in the theater.
That was the tactic she tried on Pete but for some reason it didn't work. It can't be because he wasn't interested because her pastor told her gay people weren't actually real.
She could win the public handy J competition though
Only because Pete is too classy to do out in the open.
Exactly. Handy J’s are a private and sacred thing.
Weird. She doesn't do so good with a male she can't give a handjob to in a public theater with children there. Oh well...
I don't like Buttigieg, but he's clever and charismatic while she's stupid.
She's probably not his type. And she didn't know how to handle that.
Well, she’s not my type either, and I’m pretty into women.
I find hatred and imbecility to be pretty big turn offs, and she’s got both in excess.
She's incredibly far from his type, and he's taken, and his husband probably keeps him pretty happy.
Maybe try a battle of giving handjobs at a school play.
She doesn’t have to win. She just needs the attention and to be seen as battling the other.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News