140

German police smash child sexual abuse site (www.dw.com)

submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

German police say they have shut down a "dizzyingly large" child sexual abuse image website with hundreds of thousands of users. Six people with links to the network were arrested.

top 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago

…hundreds of thousands of users

ಠ_ಠ

[-] Omgboom@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 months ago

Six people with links to the network were arrested.

[-] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

I can understand only arresting 6 people, because I doubt very many people had their hands on the actual website. But the fact that hundreds of thousands of people actually interacted with the site is downright mind boggling.

[-] subignition@fedia.io 12 points 2 months ago

If it's any comfort (it might not be), a few hundred thousand out of like 8 billion is a pretty small percentage. It's troubling that it evaded the law for long enough to accumulate that many users in one place, though :/

[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago

It's 1 in ten thousand. Likely much more in Europe or North America, accounting for people without reliable Internet access and non-English speakers. There's statistically at least a hand full in your city, if it's larger than a village

[-] webpack@ani.social 5 points 2 months ago

it could be you, it could be me, it could even be-

[-] Kronusdark@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

Phrasing on that headline. 😂

[-] gregor@gregtech.eu 13 points 2 months ago

Yea, it is quite unfortunate

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

The files are in the computer

[-] einkorn@feddit.org 11 points 2 months ago

Yeah, but did they take down the website only, or did they also take down the content they mostly link to?

In the past, there have been investigations by multiple news outlets where they found that German police would routinely seize forums and domains where links to CP were posted but would not request the hosting providers of the linked content to delete the material.

[-] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I heard about this on the Radio yesterday, IIRC they have information on a good amount of the users. I hope they find them.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

They smashed it? What, did they hit the server with a sledgehammer? Did a cop turn into The Hulk? What?

German police say they have shut down a "dizzyingly large" child sexual abuse image website

Bah.

[-] boreengreen@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

Yea, the title suck.

[-] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 7 points 2 months ago

How the fuck someone can hoard 14 fucking terabytes of sick photos???

I hope everyone involved in the production of such material spends the rest of their lives in a Guantanamo style box

[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

data storage detection dogs

didnt know dogs were used for this too!

[-] independantiste@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Hundreds of thousands of users??

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

some of them might even be Lemmy users...

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I bet they did

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

A++ Would smash again.

[+] 30p87@feddit.org -17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ok, but WHICH site did they take down? Any names or links?

🤦‍♂️

Any name of the website, for reference, or any links to further statements? Just because our police claim they achieved something does not mean I believe them at all. And even if they actually took down something, a forum style site very likely means all content was hosted externally. Essentially, the site could be rebuilt in a few days in that case.

Just stating "we took down some bad CP site" without ANY further explanation is worthless, because websites and especially darknet services are much more complicated than there being a single server, you plug that off and you saved the day. If "the internet never forgets", the darknet even gains from such events. Each piece of content will be locally stored by at least a dozen of the hundreds of thousand of members. And after that, it will be uploaded to new services (if it wasn't just spread out to dozens of 3rd parties anyway), and more people will download it. So the situation could be worse now. Doesn't matter for the stats and publicity of course. But being able to comprehend their claims and actions would at least give one either the satisfaction that cops achieved something and those fuckers were taken down, or another reason for facepalm.

The most important thing with such an event here is transparency. And in history, recently and nearly a century ago, it's not like blindly believing cops was a good option.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 months ago

[-] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 months ago

Not to take away from the joke or the implication, but I'm pretty sure the info is useless now. Just like knowing about Silk Road.

That said, I have no idea what value they could get from having an answer.

[-] 30p87@feddit.org 5 points 2 months ago

Transparency from a police force that, historically, was not transparent but arbitrary, and again reverts to that.

this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024

140 points (98.6% liked)

World News

39347 readers

3300 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.