174

The former Wyoming congresswoman Liz Cheney “hopes to be able to rebuild” the Republican party after Donald Trump leaves the political stage. Mitt Romney, the retiring Utah senator and former presidential nominee, reportedly hopes so too.

Among other prominent Republicans who refuse to bow the knee, the former Maryland governor Larry Hogan is running for a US Senate seat in a party led by Trump but insists he can be part of a post-Trump GOP.

Michael Steele, the former Republican National Committee chair turned MSNBC host, advocated more dramatic action: “We have to blow this crazy-ass party up and have it regain its senses, or something else will be born out of it. There are only two options here. Hogan will be a key player in whatever happens. Liz Cheney, [former congressmen] Adam Kinzinger and Joe Walsh – all of us who have been pushed aside and fortunately were not infected with Maga, we will have something to say about what happens on 6 November.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 22 points 3 hours ago

Trump happened because large segments of US voters feel disenfranchised and resentful, as they feel they have been left behind and that their lives have been made worse by the policies of the political establishment and experts. If said political establishment and the experts want to end the Trump movement and prevent something similar from happening again, they're going to have to address the concerns of dissatisfied voters. I don't really think either party knows how to go about doing that.

I think part of the reason for that is there's still significant discussion about what has caused so many Americans to become so unhappy with leadership, and you can't really come up with a solution until you correctly identify the problem. I still don't think the experts have a very good grasp on why Americans are upset. Until they figure it out, they can't come up with a solution, and until they come up with a solution, movements like Trumpism are still very possible.

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 hours ago

It's really not hard to identify why, but billionaires will spend their life savings convincing people that late stage capitalism and oligarchy work.

[-] knightly@pawb.social 5 points 1 hour ago

The new left party that forms in the wake of the Republican implosion will rise out of the growing union movement that is already organizing to address that fundamental problem.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 0 points 40 minutes ago

Why would they want to? They have all but taken over the democratic party. The US now has OG republicans and the new world fascist party.

The current Dem standce on immigration is wild.. not the wall is a weird idea.. no they now say trump is just ineffective in building it.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 2 points 26 minutes ago

The current Dem standce on immigration is wild.. not the wall is a weird idea.. no they now say trump is just ineffective in building it.

Republicans: "We absolutely will not allow a single bit of progress on this issue unless you give us a wall"

Democrats; "Fine you can have your wall if it means we can at least fix part of the problem now"

Seems like the wild position here are the assholes demanding a wall in order to allow action. They control the House. We have to change that.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 41 points 4 hours ago

Maybe y'all shouldn't have made it so hard for third parties to run.

[-] Rob200@lemmings.world 21 points 4 hours ago

I wouldn't mind a new socialist party in the u.s politics.

[-] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 15 points 4 hours ago

It'd be great if any of them had a proper ground game for local elections instead of just popping up every 4 years and only hyping a presidential candidate. They look too disorganized to take seriously.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 13 points 4 hours ago

It's more fundamental than that. First-past-the-post voting systems inevitably turn into two-party rule. It's built into the foundations of how the American government is voted for.

[-] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago

For federal level, I can agree that the lack of ranked-choice hurts third party chances. Voters see too much risk in not voting for a major party.

That being said, well-coordinated local and state-level can definitely get a higher rate of success and show that there's more to those parties besides political posturing. I've seen more campaigning for a primary for my local sheriff's office this year than I had ever seen for any third party candidate ever at a local level. If the third parties focused on the down ballot, they would have more opportunity to show that they can put forward competent candidates to build trust for higher elected positions.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

Most of them are too busy grifting. They're stirring up local funding collecting all the people they can and then getting a bigger payday when the 4-year elections roll around.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 hours ago

You see the same two-party rule in Canada even tho we have other viable, well-established parties.

Fptp is the problem, but neither of our (or your) major parties want to change the rules because it works for their benefit 50% of the time.

[-] ModestMeme@lemm.ee 8 points 4 hours ago

There are vast political differences between elected officials within each of the two main parties. That’s how the nation compensates for the two party system. Change a party from within -it’s absolutely possible and has been done before- instead of pissing and moaning that your little boutique clique “party” isn’t popular.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 8 points 3 hours ago

Reagan talked about 'the big tent' and did everything he could to purge anyone Left of him.

The GOP was ready for Trump for decades. George W. was just Donnie with a better staff around him.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 52 points 5 hours ago

If Trump loses, I don't know that there will be a Republican party. The top people all hate each other and the only thing that unites them is brown-nosing Trump. They will tear the party apart all trying to replace him.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 56 minutes ago

The Republican party won't go anywhere as long as we have a two party system.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 53 minutes ago

We don't have to have a two-party system. There's no law requiring the Republican party to stay together. It's just in their best interest to do so. I don't know that they'll care about what's in their best interest after Trump. They'll be too busy tearing each other apart, something they've wanted to do since 2015.

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The Democratic party will become the new right wing party. The question is whether the Republican party will survive in a new hyper fascist mode, or a real left wing party will pick up the pieces.

My hope is for the latter, but realistically it'll be the former.

[-] Username02@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

I used to see it that way but now? I doubt it will be that simple. So what if Trump is gone and no other republican leader can fit his shoes? Do they even have to?

Maybe it can be even more beneficial for the republicans to have a dead Trump. They can finally have complete control over his thoughts, his brand, image, his idealogy. With ai technology they can insert a nostalgic idealized version of Trump that he never was. More charismatic, more cohesive, malleable, and eternal. A figure like Jesus, like Mlk, like founding fathers. Who cares the real trump is dead? You can do anything with a base that is so hopelessly lost.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Somehow no other Repub is that shameless or that willing to behave like a schoolyard bully. The secret sauce is a guy who will say bigoted dictator shit out loud while doing an endless and uninterrupted parade of scandals.

I don't know why they are unable to reproduce it since the party is full of shamelessly corrupt bigots who should in theory be willing to try. I guess looking like a complete dipshit hurts their pride, whereas Donald is an actual dipshit so it comes naturally.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 43 points 5 hours ago

Which will be the optimal outcome

Unless they take the country with them

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

That only happens if he wins.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Or if their next attempt at murderous insurrection succeeds.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 12 points 4 hours ago

I have to think there's something going on behind the scenes to organize a schism in the GOP, no matter what happens in this election. I think it's unlikely that Liz Cheney and people like her will be able to wrest control of the current Republican party away from the fart sniffers, so they're going to have to split and make a new party.

The outstanding question is "Why haven't they done this already?" Maybe there's just not enough solid support to pull it off ahead of the election, surely because there are a lot of people who are sniffing the farts out of fear, and they don't want to burn that bridge yet.

Pay real close attention after this election. Lindsey Graham is going to show his other face again, and a whole bunch of other politicians will, too. Yes, there needs to be a path to redemption, but that path is going to have to include resignation for the likes of Graham, Vance, McConnell, anyone who supported Trump, then very much didn't, and then supported him again. Such people cannot be entrusted with elected office.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 1 points 37 minutes ago

Nah, not enough money. The donor class is firmly behind trump and his endless tax cuts for the rich.

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 16 points 4 hours ago

Don’t do that. Don’t give me hope.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 4 hours ago

I'm trying really hard to not be a pessimist right now for what I think are obvious reasons. It's not easy.

[-] knightly@pawb.social 5 points 1 hour ago

Realistically, I'm jazzed to learn that my post-2024-election predictions from 2015 are already coming true.. we might actually get the good future where the Democrats are the right-wing bad guys.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 14 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, that's definitely a possible scenario. I'm just undecided if I should fear that inevitable power vacuum or just grab some popcorn.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago

Popcorn initially, because it's an election loser in the short-term. Long-term, they just need to find another Trump.

[-] assembly@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

The entire Republican base will just vote red all the way down no matter who is in the ballot so I don’t think there is a scenario where the Republican Party ever dissolves. They could run a monkey for state senate in red districts and it would win office.

[-] themadcodger@kbin.earth 17 points 4 hours ago

If Jesus ran as a Democrat and Satan as a Republican, current day Republicans would wonder why god wanted Satan in the white house

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 44 minutes ago

Nah, they'd call Jesus communist and vote for their lord and savior Satan.

[-] Wiz@midwest.social 1 points 1 hour ago

"The Lord is using him as a vessel to do his good works."

[-] SomeKindaName@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago

Wonder? You give a lot of credit.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago

I'm saying the Republican party itself will fracture into more than one party. I just don't see them uniting without a cult of personality at this point.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 hours ago

you have to admit, it has been satisfying to watch them eat each other

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

Within a year or two of Trump dying they will have the party back under control and everyone will be taking marching orders from only the megadonors again.

The only reason the maga nutjobs got tontake center stage was Trump saying the horrible shit out loud with the delivery that some people wanted to hear. The fact that nobody has upstaged him is a good sign that there isn't a similar person waiting in the wings to fill his role.

[-] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 3 points 2 hours ago

Not so fast. David Duke was saying the quiet part out loud and he was only a fringe candidate. There’s something else going on here, I don’t know what it is exactly, that makes Trump more marketable.

The only things I can think of is that he has had decades in the public eye, and he’s been presented as smart and successful. And also oddly, he reflects a bygone era in America where blue collar union guys had pensions and that this was all blown away by corporate greed and globalization.

And yet somehow, this billionaire who’s known for grift and not paying his workers, somehow became their champion. The whole process has opened my eyes to just how much marketing works on a certain demographic.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

There’s something else going on here, I don’t know what it is exactly, that makes Trump more marketable.

He is a professional bullshitter who can say anything with a straight face. It works on a large part of the population, because humans are social creatures who want to hear what they want to hear. They want to be told all their problems will be magically solved and are the fault of someone else.

[-] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 hours ago

His kids are probably waiting in the wings expecting to be future candidates.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 5 points 3 hours ago

We have to blow this crazy-ass party up and have it regain its senses

You all going back to Eisenhower years then? The rot has been in the party for a long time, Trump is just the final result, not a cause.

[-] Wiz@midwest.social 3 points 1 hour ago

I might vote for an Eisenhower Republican. 90% tax on the rich to pay for infrastructure and federal work programs? Sign me up.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 49 minutes ago

Wait that far? I'd have said Reagan.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 2 points 40 minutes ago

Reagan was a product of the shift Republicans had made earlier to help guarantee votes and power. The difference in the GOP then and now was mainly in how much they could say out loud.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

If trump loses? Yeah. They will. He is already going extra senile and has spent the past eight years proving he can't get downballot candidates elected.

Which will get us back to bush era republicans. Basically buying us maybe another decade until they transition from "we need to fight crime and promote family values" to "let's murder some brown people and enslave women" again.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 hours ago

How about not having a party that did everything possible to get us to this place. I want what the dems are now to be as far to the right as this country is willing to go.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
174 points (98.9% liked)

News

23252 readers
3338 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS