538

Bluesky managed to go offline practically entirely. I count on you folks to spork the hell out of this.

See also here.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 131 points 1 week ago

Sorry, Lemmy.world and Lemmy.ml were down for maintenance again. You were saying?

[-] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 81 points 1 week ago

Well, this user has posted on feddit.uk with a sh.itjust.works account. I would have been able to see it, but you wouldn't have.

To be honest, lemmy.world AND lemmy.ml could go offline I would barely notice it.

[-] SARGE@startrek.website 44 points 1 week ago

I think I would mainly notice because my whole feed would be wholesome, supportive, and funny.

[-] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Fuck you

^/s^

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

I have them both blocked, so yeah, they aren't that important at all.

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago

i can understand blocking .ml, whats wrong with .world though?

[-] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They have "power users" that mod multiples of the largest communities and will delete comments of they disagree with your opinion, citing "civility" or other nonsense, even when you're repeating back exactly what was said to you. So, yeah, abusive moderation.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Purely anecdotal but… the 3 stupidest people I’ve ever met online were all from .world - and there seems to be a propensity for deleting comments that go against their world view. Only knowingly interacted with one .ml poster and they were perfectly decent.

[-] FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Look at this social butterfly who’s interacted with 3 people

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

And the fact that I had no idea kinda disproves your point. I am browsing Lemmy a lot.

[-] Voltage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago

The joke is that most of lemmycels are on lemmy.world and lemmy.ml. Not that these instances literally went down.

[-] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago

Because most of the communities are on those 2 instances. In terms of userbase world does have the most users, but they're the exception as other "big" instances are more evenly split.

So instead of a single instance going down we have 2 main instances that need to go down, and even if they go down we'd have lemmee, shitjustworks, lemmyca and blahaj (and I guess also lemmynsfw) communities feeding the feed.

[-] ghen@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I could absolutely cruise games and memes on shit just works for a day if other instances are down

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

(and db0 for the fun stuff, gosh)

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Lemm.ee represent

[-] Voltage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

I agree, having multiple main instance is better than what we had. Also thank you for reminding me lemmynsfw, time for donating.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

No idea what a lemmycel is or what that would have to do with bluesky

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 week ago

Can they do it again please?

[-] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Shit doesn't work

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MimicJar@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago

Based on https://www.theverge.com/2024/11/14/24296537/bluesky-acting-up-outage-down it was down for 15-30 minutes and for some it was just read-only.

Lemmy instances regularly go down for maintenance longer than this.

Twitter used to regularly "fail whale" and in the long run no one cares.

Yes, decentralizing is a good thing. Yes, it's fun to poke at BlueSky. But in the long run if you have a product that people want to use then they'll put up with a lot of crap/downtime.

[-] kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago

The point is that bluesky has no interest in being actually decentralized, it's just a gimmick

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Eh, I feel like the important part of decentralization right now is the potential to migrate.

Like, how many social media sites actually last 5 years before shitting the bed?

If admins of an instance get shitty, it's trivial to move to a new one. Traditional social media you'd have to migrate to a completely different site, with different features, layout, and other stuff.

People won't all wait for the same reason, as the biggest becomes actually "big" we'll see them start to fracture.

There just wasn't enough people on fediverse to start out like that.

So think of Blue sky, World, and all those other "big" instances that still don't have that many users as the egg for the future fediverse that actually has enough users to be proper decentralized

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 10 points 1 week ago

at least when an AP instance goes titsup people can hop on another instance. thats not currently possible with bluesky. to me that puts AP a step above AT

[-] Jozav@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Is migrating really practical? Will your followers automatically follow you on your new server?

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 week ago

On Mastodon yes, it is also compatible with a few other software like Akkoma. Your followers will get a notification that you moved and will automatically follow the new account. Works very seamlessly in my experience.

[-] Jozav@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Thanks a lot, very helpful

[-] RandomStickman@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago

On Mastodon it's very easy and it brings your followers over

[-] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

It offers possibilities, which are infinitely more probable than systems without such possibilities.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Backlog3231@reddthat.com 9 points 1 week ago

bluesky is more federated than threads, but less federated than mastodon. As I understand it, you can more or less host your own bluesky "instance". Though it is difficult to do and some parts you have to build yourself, it is technically doable. This is not the case on threads, I believe.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

At this point, anything that hurts Twitter is good. Bluesky may go down in two years, but if twitter dies in one, I'll be happy. People need to learn to jump platforms again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] capital@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

It's more like """federated""".

[-] RandomVideos@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

Assuming people dont make multiple accounts and each server goes offline for maintenance for the same time, wouldnt both one server and multiple servers act the same for the user?

[-] scott@authorship.studio 3 points 1 week ago

The interesting thing is that Bluesky might become federated because of bridges to the fediverse. You would be able to federate with Bluesky with a fediverse server.

[-] mm_maybe@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

also incredibly easy for the federal government to take them out

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
538 points (95.7% liked)

Fediverse memes

384 readers
547 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS