537

Summary

Donald Trump and Republicans are falsely framing his 2024 election win as a historic “landslide” and sweeping mandate, despite the data showing otherwise.

Trump won the popular vote by just 1.6%, the smallest margin for a winning president since 1968, and his 307 electoral votes rank low in U.S. history.

Crucial Senate and House gains were limited, with Republicans relying on gerrymandering for their narrow House majority.

This exaggeration of victory serves to justify potential power expansions, but the facts debunk claims of an unprecedented or overwhelming mandate.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 204 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It’s time to nip that lie in the bud

Frankly, I'm sick and tired of nipping MAGA lies in the bud every day. It's been the better part of a decade of this bullshit already... I fucking hate that my countrymen chose this for us for the next four years. Fuck every Trump voter, but a much bigger fuck you goes out to all the jackasses that stayed home on the 5th. You're complicit, and I don't give a shit why you think fascism is "okay" as long as you got to punish the Democratic Party for your grievances.

[-] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly, until media reframes this from distraction politics to a call to action none of this matters. Wake me up when we have a functioning government again.

I'll be focusing locally on building mutual aid networks and contributing as much as I can to local policy and governance.

mutualaidhub.org/

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I think the bigger message is that our information environment is totally screwed.

The eye-opener for me was watching our local news station interview college students coo and rave over how "strong" he was and repeat (apparently not) obvious misinformation.

It wasn't about apathy, not really... He just won an influencer war. And now the CEO of Twitter is basically president..

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Wait until the idiots graduate and look for a job. The Orange Bag of Shit holds the record for US unemployment and he has a very good chance of breaking it again.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

To be fair, and president would have been screwed over during covid, even if they had "contained" it (which, looking at China, seems highly unlikely).

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 2 weeks ago

I'm sick and tired of anywhere near half of the voting public choosing him.

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 85 points 2 weeks ago

Doesn't matter. He won the presidency. He has demonstrated his entire life that he will just do whatever he wants and dare the world to stop him. (Narrator: They haven't.) Now he also has near-complete criminal immunity once he's inaugurated. He's already stacking up appointees who are going to follow his orders.

"B-b-but Senate confirmation --" Shut the fuck up. Whoever he wants to be in charge of departments is going to be in charge of departments. Don't appoint anyone else, throw "Acting" in front of the title, done and done. What is anyone going to do about it? Fucking nothing.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Of course it matters. It doesn't matter to trump but the public is not trump

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 11 points 2 weeks ago

If it doesn’t matter enough for anyone to do anything about it, it doesn’t matter at all.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] boaratio@lemmy.world 56 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe if we correct the Republicans they'll listen. Yeah, that'll work.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

Republicans are trying to gaslight us by calling Trump's win a landslide. The point isn't to correct them; it's to make sure we don't believe the lies they tell us.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 53 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe the media themselves shouldn't have been running around talking about the absolutely massive and devastating defeat the Democrats suffered the day after the election... Maybe they should have waited for all the results?

Nahhh... Clicks clicks clicks! It's all that matters! Money money money!

All corporate media:

[-] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That really doesn't make me feel that much better about it, but I guess we're mostly trying to find the corn in the shit on this one, so thanks?

[-] unmagical@lemmy.ml 39 points 2 weeks ago

They already have power. They don't need a justification for expansion they'll just do it.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

Yes and no. All power, ultimately, depends on compliance. Even autocracies. There would not have been a "divine right of kings" if kings did not have a pressing need to assure people of their right to hold power.

The "mandate" narrative is aimed at convincing everyone that their objections are in the minority. That even if they stand up and say something, they'll simply be the odd one out.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Cold_Brew_Enema@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago

Who cares he still fucking won. We are fucked regardless.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That's not going to fly when the entire country saw him sweep the swing states. That's part of the fuckiness of the EC, he only won by a tiny margin but visually state after state went red on the TV.

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

Have you seen the crowd in his 2016 inauguration? It was huuuge. Or how he fit 80,000 people in a 20,000 capacity venue.

People should know by now that he exaggerate everything including the size of his mushroom penis.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yarr@feddit.nl 20 points 2 weeks ago

This is one of the reasons I hate talking in abstracts. I hear people talking about landslides, but what does that mean numerically? If there was a vote with a pool of 10 people and a candidate got 6 of those is that a landslide? Is 9/10 a landslide?

Some people talk "landslide" but without knowing what that means, it makes it hard to have a conversation.

[-] chakan2@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

That's pedantic. They won the trifecta of government. The definition of landslide is academic at this point.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

the point is to wake us up to that our resistance coalitions needn't be small

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

It might only be pedantic/academic if the term was only being used in an educational setting. Instead, it's bandied about nearly every day since the election, and it does need to stop.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

Wait, did a major outlet just use "lie" in its headline?

I'm impressed. Even for an op-ed.

Anyway, this cannot be repeated enough. I'm already sick of people trying to say it's "historic", it's a "landslide", etc....give me a break.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Juice@midwest.social 16 points 2 weeks ago

Fight the real fight: pedantically correcting conservative strawmen by reading an article about it. Subscribe for 7.99 per month for 6 months, promo code - RESISTANCE

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Trump won the popular vote by just 1.6%, the smallest margin for a winning president since 1968…

What about Trump and Bush 2 both losing the popular vote yet winning the presidency?

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

It's ok for liberals to criticize trump, but revealing the sham of "democracy" is a few steps too far.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Half of Lemmy seems to believe that Trump won by a landslide. Remember a comment upvoted like crazy yesterday talking about how hard he won.

I mean I get it, the fact that he won by any amount is horrifying but nuance exists. I'm glad to see this article attempting to clear it up

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Cheems@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

When I was younger I thought the saying was, "nip it in the butt"

I dunno it always made sense to me.

Anywho carry on

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] squozenode@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

In states where he won, it was either a blood-red wave, or barely past 50%.

[-] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, yea? What are the other options?

[-] classic@fedia.io 6 points 2 weeks ago

Too late. It's that whole thing where it takes ten times the effort to undo misinformation than to introduce it (or however that goes). This narrative is here to stay. Those who try to counter it will just be in the role of the "Well Ackchyually" guy in the conversation

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
537 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19238 readers
2114 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS