305
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Nebraska’s Republican Gov. Jim Pillen on Wednesday signed an executive order strictly defining a person’s sex.

The order notably does not use the term “transgender,” although it appears directed at limiting transgender access to certain public spaces. It orders state agencies to define “female” and “male” as a person’s sex assigned at birth.

“It is common sense that men do not belong in women’s only spaces,” Pillen said in a statement. “As Governor, it is my duty to protect our kids and women’s athletics, which means providing single-sex spaces for women’s sports, bathrooms, and changing rooms.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world 87 points 10 months ago

I still don't understand what business the government has defining sex. How is that in any way the government's job?? If anything, it could be up to medical organizations, such as the AMA, if they had sound arguments. But, the government? I really try to at least understand everyone's logic even if I don't agree with them, but this is just so insane. I don't get it.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago

That’s because there is no logic, the people that want the government to define sex have a purely emotional reaction to the very existence of trans people… and most things that don’t align with their narrow life experience and worldview

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 74 points 10 months ago

Just a reminder if you are worried about your children being ogled by trans people in the "wrong" restroom: There are ten gays for every one trans person, so the likelihood of being ogled by people in the "right restroom" should be ten times higher. The solution is not to police who uses what restroom, but to design restrooms that don't allow for ogling!

I swear, the only proof of a grand gay conspiracy I've ever found is the bathtub urinal. Walls, people, real walls, not plywood separators that have gaps between the doors and opening on the bottom.

[-] fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 10 months ago

Also don't for a second think that they aren't coming for gay and lesbian people next.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Wahots@pawb.social 13 points 10 months ago

That, and like, don't flatter yourself (person who is afraid of getting hit on by a hypothetical gay guy in a bathroom). Most people, the vast majority, look like 20 lbs of birdshit.

There's better places to date and get asked out anyways, like a gay bar, or at a fun climbing gym. If you do get asked out (which won't happen), take it as a compliment for not looking like hell and move on. xD

load more comments (39 replies)
[-] littlewonder@lemmy.world 56 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Can't wait for them to remember that trans men exist. There's going to be a lot of shocked Pikachu Republicans when men who look like men show up in "women's spaces" because they're being forced to.

Wish I could be a fly on the wall to see that fucking awesome scenario.

But seriously, trans folks, you don't deserve this bullshit and I hate that your existence is the controversy of the moment for Republicans. Be well and take care of yourselves <3.

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 54 points 10 months ago

I recall an article about that exact thing happening - a trans man had to use a women's restroom because of the local red policy over his birth cert saying female.

People saw a man enter a woman's restroom, and proceeded to beat the shit out of him.

It's a feature, not a bug.

Don't ever forget that for republicans, cruelty is the goal.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 42 points 10 months ago

It's designed to put trans people in an impossible position. Use the bathroom you want to and get brutalized by the cops, or use the bathroom you're legally required to use and get brutalized by private citizens while the cops look the other way.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 34 points 10 months ago

It's also gonna suck for any cis women accused of being trans, and subject to invasive "verification"

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 21 points 10 months ago

It's not gonna be fun at all because it will involve trans men being threatened and assaulted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 48 points 10 months ago
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] dmonzel@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago
[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

They just want it small enough to fit in your underwear.

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 36 points 10 months ago

Fucking fascist pieces of shit need to go on a pyre.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] SuperSecretThrowaway@lemmynsfw.com 35 points 10 months ago

Of fucking course. The law equally prevents the rich and poor from sleeping under bridges.

[-] cmac@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago

Does this mean that if there's a clerical error and your baby's birth certificate lists the wrong sex, it's illegal to get it corrected?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ExFed@lemm.ee 26 points 10 months ago

This reads a lot like the Indiana Pi Bill. Granted, that one never passed, but it's a pretty old story: politicians think they know better than experts.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

And now that our Supreme Court has thrown Chevron Deference out the window, that old story may have a different, much worse, ending.

Look at how they just forced the EPA to stop protecting over 60% of wetlands in the US. Look at what they're doing with the FDA and mifepristone.

Bad times ahead.

[-] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

ITT: Everyone conflating sex for gender...

It's actually quite important. Your sex are what your chromosomes are, your gender is what you identify as.

Your sex doesn't change, your gender does.

That's literally the definition of it.

This is important especially for medical purposes, medication, surgery, emergency care...etc all has variations based on your sex, because different sexes are predisposed to different classes of problems and interactions. This also applies to REPORTING, reporting that a medication affects someone born female different than someone born male is an extremely important distinction.

Incorrect reporting literally costs lives.

It should to be standardized, just like everything else that has significant consequences on well being.

Politics are ruining what should be completed apolitical...


And it looks like lemmy is just Reddit again, except at least on Reddit you can find an informed opinion before the bottom of the thread. This thread is completely devoid of critical thinking....

[-] radix@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago

You didn't say anything inaccurate, but you also appear to be missing the point almost entirely.

“It is common sense that men do not belong in women’s only spaces,” Pillen said in a statement. “As Governor, it is my duty to protect our kids and women’s athletics, which means providing single-sex spaces for women’s sports, bathrooms, and changing rooms.”

This isn't about clinical reporting standards. This is about being able to regulate social settings based on sex instead of gender. By legally clarifying the definitions, there can be no confusion when they follow this up with banning male-sexed individuals from female-gendered bathrooms.

[-] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Umm... I hate to tell you this but this is propagating some pretty harmful misinformation...

The reactions to medications are actually more closely tied to the hormone balance and body fat distribution of a person than their sex. It's a common issue in the trans community where birth certificates are non-updatable that a doctor will prescribe meds for a person's birth sex but because they are fully transitioned through HRT they get the effects more common to their phenotype presentation. This means that treatment is more commonly in line with their gender identity because of their hormonal medication and other procedures like an orchiectomy that make a person more similar to where they transitioned to then where they transitioned from.

With trans paitents by and large the safer way to behave is to go with the "if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and talks like a duck... If you are in a pinch and can't ask them for specifics because they can't talk - treat them like a duck." While a lot of doctors aren't super well versed in trans specific healthcare it remains a huge problem inside the community for trans women particularly being dosed like cis men which often means they respond like cis women to a lot of different things which is on average a little more scary because meds often linger longer than is expected in trans women's tissues just like cis women. Sometimes this causes some cascading problems.

Pharmacology wise the way trans folks react to different medications is still a bit of a frontier science... But dollars to donuts "just treat em like their birth sex and call it a day" is way too simplistic a take. The lived experience and often physical nature of gender do not stay nicely behind a cordon marked "politics". Trans ignorance in healthcare can be very scary for someone whose endocrinologist has informed them what they should be given and treated like and then some hotshot resident could just decide to not listen should the trans person in question be placed in a position where they are in extreme distress and have to self advocate and educate the person caring for them on what may be the worst day of their life.

[-] 1609_kilometers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This is important especially for medical purposes, medication, surgery, emergency care... [...] Incorrect reporting literally costs lives.

Surely that was the intention 👀

“It is common sense that men do not belong in women’s only spaces,” Pillen said in a statement. “As Governor, it is my duty to protect our kids and women’s athletics, which means providing single-sex spaces for women’s sports, bathrooms, and changing rooms.”

The Nebraska and Oklahoma orders both include definitions for the words “man,” “boy,” “woman,” “girl,” “father” and “mother.”

Also

And it looks like lemmy is just Reddit again, except at least on Reddit you can find an informed opinion before the bottom of the thread. This thread is completely devoid of critical thinking...

This is a really dismissive way to deal with disagreements (also peak reddit behavior, it's only missing the "edit:")

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Sex is far more complicated than just what is assigned at birth. Especially if you take stuff like hormones into consideration.

Nature doesn't work in discrete categories. Almost everything in nature is fluid and amorphous to some degree. Exceptions to every rule humans can think of.

And if you talk about sex about purely what gametes you have, then that isn't really very useful to talk about in practice outside of reproduction. When laymen talk about sex, they mean perceived sex more than anything else (and to prove the point, the article talks about sexed places and such..). Leave anything else to medical professionals.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 16 points 10 months ago

Yes, and we all know that was the intention behind this order. To protect people from incorrect medical reporting 🙄.

The people you're seemingly mad at never wanted to make this political. Trans people are just people that want to exist. That's it.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Your sex are what your chromosomes are

So we need to genetically test all babies at birth?

Otherwise, I don't know how we would figure out the sex of the ones with Swyer Syndrome- XY but with female genitalia.

And assigning their sex as male at birth doesn't make much sense to me.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Widowmaker_Best_Girl@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

"assigned"? How can it be assigned when it's a natural state of being? That's like saying the kids also get assigned hair color or eye color at birth.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

They're trying to co-opt language "assigned at birth" is a trans phrase

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Funny thing, both of those can change too. I was blond when I was a kid, now my hair is brown, and when I'm old it'll be gray.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Because it's not always one or the other. Sex and gender are far more complicated than just X or Y.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] squiblet@kbin.social 17 points 10 months ago

Maybe someday, someone will successfully describe the difference between sex and gender to a conservative.

[-] AnonTwo@kbin.social 20 points 10 months ago

It's not about being successful. They don't want to know.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
305 points (94.2% liked)

News

21850 readers
5250 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS