this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
24 points (92.9% liked)

Canada

9555 readers
787 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Election Interference / Misinformation

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dwazou@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Meet Jeff Ballingall. He runs ''Canada Proud'', a popular facebook page.

From the article:

Canada Proud often posts news updates, citing mainstream news sources that are barred from sharing their content on Facebook. The posts sometime add misleading details not found in the original reports, according to a review by The Times.

One of its posts this month said Markey Carney had suspended his campaign because of “connections with China” and cited a major Canadian news outlet, Global News, as its source. But the Global News article didn't mention connections to China

Canada Proud, which describes itself as a “grass-roots group of Canadians” concerned about the country’s direction, is run by Mobilize Media Group, a public affairs firm that has worked for Conservative Party candidates.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/21/technology/canada-election-facebook-instagram-meta.html

[–] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 23 hours ago

Markey Carney

[–] Corngood@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This was such a huge own goal. They need to fix this asap.

I'm not saying put things back the way they were, but stop the disincentive for real news. Maybe tax social media and subsidise journalism, or otherwise regulate them in some way.

[–] SamuelRJankis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago

People need to seperate what happened to quantify the win and losses of the actions.

The original bill was intended for news corporation to get a fair cut for their content. Even with just Google signing on for a 100 million was a significant success.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/google-online-news-act-exemption-1.7422690

For accessibility to news. Having less access to news for people always a bad thing. Having little to no regulations for modern media has also been a huge failure for almost all governments globally.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Facebook was always crap. It's a propaganda tool masquerading as enterprise.

Maybe tax social media and subsidise journalism, or otherwise regulate them in some way.

That's what they did.

[–] Corngood@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No, they tried to tax links to news, so facebook just took the links away.

I'm saying tax or regulate the platform itself.

Edit: to give a practical example off the top of my head: tariff foreign advertising services targeting Canadians (or even more broadly), use that to subsidise media.