this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
313 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

71995 readers
2943 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 135 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Amazon announced using drones in 2014. In pop culture, drone delivery is like an assumed common practice. Yet fucking nobody gets their packages delivered by drone. It's been over a decade.

These robots are vaporware. Amazon will get a stock bump and that's the whole point.

[–] Buckshot@programming.dev 36 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

Yeah, humans regularly deliver stuff wrong on our street. There is no way robots will manage. I get packages for both by neighbours and they get mine more often than correct deliveries and one of my neighbours is a business.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

At my old workplace we ended up getting like a thousand toilet seats delivered to us. We were a web publishing firm.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Perhaps it wasn't an accident... 😂

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 weeks ago

Stop redirecting them. Make it cost them.

Tell your neighbors to file an “it arrived late” or “it didn’t arrive” complaint. Get two and send one back. Their fault for being shit companies.

If something is delivered to you by mistake, it’s not your responsibility to fix the mistake, you just got free stuff.

If it goes through USPS, it might be a federal offense to open stuff delivered via USPS, but is that true of third party parcel delivery? Almost certainly not, because USPS is a government org and those third party shit delivery companies aren’t..

So now any package that’s delivered to me by anyone other than USPS.. it’s mine now, and I open it to see if I want whatever trash my neighbors are buying.

I used to try to fix the problem.. but then I realized it’s NOT MY PROBLEM.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mustbe3to20signs@feddit.org 105 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Companies like Amazon would do anything. Except paying living wages

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Remember that hitch hiking robot that made it across Canada but only made it to New Jersey (started in NYC) in America? These will 100% get the same treatment everywhere on earth.

[–] mustbe3to20signs@feddit.org 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Not only Canada, but also Japan and Europe.
The main difference is that these robots kind of deserve it. Not "personally" but for what they represent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 50 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Wanna bet its 7000 Indian workers again?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 45 points 3 weeks ago

Anything to avoid one of the richest people in the world paying his employees a livable wage.

[–] VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I imagine they will scale back robot design and just throw from the truck.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

...okay, I really want to know the story behind that picture!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] frazw@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Amazon 1 year after launch: Unfortunately, the space needed for robots in the van means that the van has to return to base 5 times more often to reload with the actual packages and the extra weight of robots more than doubles the weight of the van being lugged around in the form of heavy robots. So that's why we are having to charge more for delivery and why it is taking longer for you to get your packages. But at least we can pay fewer salaries.

[–] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

Also we don’t pay taxes but will fuck up the roads with the extra weight. Good luck driving over potholes suckers!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The robot then encounters the entirely unpredictable American rural south

staircases half busted up surrounded by weeds and gravel roads full of holes

robots fucked with by kids who are now tying it to a tree with bungie cords for fun

one being dragged off in the background by a dude with a welding mask on

wageslave.exe has encountered an internal exception and must close

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Wonder how much copper is wired up in those things

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I'd be terrified if that thing showed up at my door.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Better keep a big furnace full of molten steel ready just in case.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

I tend to disbelieve this, mainly because a humanoid robot would be overkill. Custom-purpose robots would be much cheaper to design, build and maintain, with fewer potential failure points.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

Be funny if hackers hacked them to kill CEOs.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Amazon still can't even figure out how to reliably get human drivers door passcodes into an apartment building, and then into its mail/package locker room.

The map system it uses for telling drivers how to get around a city to make deliveries is also garbage, can't account for traffic, punishes people for using faster side routes to get to the same place, tells you to park in areas that either have no parking at all, or where parking there would majorly disrupt traffic, or assumes available street parking will always exist in places and times it almost never does.

I once did an Amazon delivery gig where they booked me in for the time slot, I get to the FC, after waiting an hour they tell half of us: 'oops we booked too many drivers, so today you all get $200 for showing up and doing nothing, go home now'

???

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Update: It is day 126 and Amazon still can't figure out where my camera is.

I know where it is. Their delivery driver stole it. (Yes, I just charged back my credit card. Their response was to send me an incredibly smarmy and condescending form email asking why, as if they don't already know. And they lost the chargeback dispute, obviously.)

So maybe their robots won't steal your package. They'll just yeet it into a bush 65536 yards from your house in a random direction instead. On the bright side, you might occasionally get a package that belongs to someone else from the other side of town dropped on your lawn.

To both this and that I say no thanks; I don't use Amazon anymore.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 15 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

They'll be vandalised almost immediately.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 14 points 3 weeks ago

everyone knows its just going to be indians in a data center in india controlling the bots.

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

They can depreciate these assets over their useful life, because unlike your soggy flesh sack, these are capital expenses, not operating expenses.

... For now. I'm sure there are libertarians that think you should be able to sell yourself as the depreciable asset you are.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Not in Philly they won't lol

[–] skip0110@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 weeks ago

Amazons “genius” packing bots will throw a tiny fragile thing with a medium size heavy thing in a box 16x too big along with a shred of packing material.

Can’t wait to have that same “genius” applied to the actual delivery itself.

Seriously, I make maybe 5 or 6 Amazon purchases per year. I would say at least 50% of those disappoint in some way: the item was misleadingly listed, or it was damaged in shipping, or it doesn’t arrive when the promised. I really don’t find it convenient at all.

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

If i see a humanoid robot delivering a package i will throw bricks at it and then pee on it, in the way a 3 year old would during a tantrum.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 weeks ago

I, for one, will certainly not loot it for parts, unless it has an unfortunate accident, in which case I'm just recycling trash that someone left out.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

No they fucking aren't. That shit would be so much more expensive than a person. Liars, and not even particularly good ones.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] xektop@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

So, from what little research I did the robots cost from 5000$ to 500000$, as most articles point out the advanced robots cost 200000-300000$. In a lot of places around the world that's like paying a human for 8-10 years. Humans are easily "replaceable", where those robots have maintenance cost additional to the initial "investment". How is that feasible in the eyes of the big money oligarchs? I genuinely don't understand the end goal here.

[–] mustbe3to20signs@feddit.org 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

I don't think they really plan to replace workers with robots. It fulfills two other purposes:

  • Keep the work force humble by threatening them with permanent replaceability.
  • Keep the stock holders happy. This shit simulates "innovation" like the delivery drones 10 years ago.
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago

They already treat their workers like humanoid robots, so this tracks.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

what? they gave up on the drones?

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 17 points 3 weeks ago

I guess they felt like drones flying over civilian populations was a bit too unsettling in this day and age, so they are shifting to humanoids that will jump suddenly from moving vehicles and dash towards a destination.

[–] andybytes@programming.dev 9 points 3 weeks ago

I just stop buying from Amazon

[–] last_philosopher@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Let's count the problems:

  1. Up front cost
  2. Maintenance cost
  3. Varied problems like different types of stairs, tripping hazards, etc.
  4. People attacking or stealing robots and their packages.
  5. Safety issues with 100+ pound metal robots falling on pets and children

Any others?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

At first glance it looked like the robot has a tail. That would be cool and seems like it might help somehow. Add a tail!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nthavoc@lemmy.today 7 points 3 weeks ago

They will train it so well, it will even collapse like a human when overworked! https://youtu.be/6Kp5qrCExps . I recognized that bot from the photo.

[–] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

I hate that!

load more comments
view more: next ›