Slop.

China will steal our torment nexus which is why we need more funding to build an even more tormentuous torment nexus!

Yeah dude what the fuck that jumped out to me too

It was like that for the whole Cold War, this isn't that much different

"The US used nuclear weapons against Japan, which cost many thousands their lives, some in horrific fashion" then the next twenty paragraphs are about what the USSR might do with their nukes, despite never having done anything

Just recycling old material

Liberals view morality in terms of teams instead of actions/consequences.

"If the evil Reds do it, it's because they are evil and want to cause suffering. But if we justice seeking Blues do it, it's because it was the just thing to do and any causalities are an unfortunate cost we have to pay" and if you point out their hypocritical view by giving examples they cry about so called what-about-ism.

Liberals spend 100% of their time talking about the hypothetical murders China might do at some vague nondescript point in the future and 0% of their time talking about the actual murders daddy USA is doing right now

These are not brute-force tools. They are archetypal trickster weapons. Devious, non-linear, disruptive. Not designed to win battles, but to upend balance. Their job is not to kill soldiers. It is to unnerve populations.

I have seen next to zero mainstream agitprop when netanyahoo was given a standing ovation in the congress (I think?) but there was a relentless barrage of it for the resent Trump-Putin meet speaking as if Putin is an indiscriminate mass murderer. There is zero connect to reality.

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

• yewtu.be
• inv.nadeko.net
• yt.artemislena.eu
• piped.video

followed by "you're not just x, you're y". em dash and GPT emoji too. wonder how much of this is AI

you don't know how many times they sat there refreshing to re generate a response to their initial prompt "make up a boogieman about China that doesn't implicate NATO" (it implicates NATO because it doesn't understand)

Nah, the thing is NATO loves doing it

The US Navy used sea-launched Tomahawk missiles with Kit-2 warheads, involving reels of carbon fibers, in Iraq as part of Operation Desert Storm during the Gulf War in 1991, where it disabled about 85% of the electricity supply. The US Air Force used the CBU-94, dropped by F-117 Nighthawks, during the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia on 2 May 1999, where it disabled more than 70% national grid electricity supply. The supply was restored in less than 24 hours though was later disrupted by a further attack on 7 May 1999. It was again used following the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

So all western controlled human rights agencies just say it's "questionable" or it's cool because power supply is of dual use, like Human Rights Watch:

Coalition forces did, however, identify certain targets as "dual use," including electricity and media installations. Human Rights Watch's investigations found that air strikes on civilian power distribution facilities in al-Nasiriyya caused serious civilian suffering and that the legality of the attacks on media installations was questionable.

what the use of an emp(in effect) equivalent that doesn't kill people(directly)? or that it would target civilian infrastructure (like conventional weapons also do)?