this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2025
1180 points (99.8% liked)

Greentext

7500 readers
900 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 144 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 110 points 1 month ago (2 children)

huge number of people who make controversial statements (particularly those who are pro-russia) have their profiles set to hidden so you can't see what else they have posted

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 81 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That is very much the first people I would expect making use of that feature, yes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] logi@piefed.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Huh. How hard is it to make a browser extension that automatically down votes posts by any such person? Asking for people who might still be on there.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Probably easy. However, anyone using such extension would be banned for voting manipulation. YMMV on how justified the later is.

[–] ferrule@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

honestly people just need to stop using the site.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 138 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Absolutely horrid feature. Supposedly it's to protect vulnerable people's privacy if they post in certain communities, but if they truly wanted that to be how it's used, they'd have limited the ability to apply the feature only to subreddits where mods have specifically coordinated with the admins to get approved as places where vulnerable people are posting. Or, and here's a shocker, they could just rely on the tried-and-tested method of using alt accounts. Instead, bots and trolls just hide their entire post history from people.

Now, supposedly, mods can see the full, unhidden history of any user who has recently posted in their subreddits. Which is good. But the number of other good-faith users being obstructed by this change is huge. It's overall a massive failure from Reddit.

[–] yogurtwrong@lemmy.world 73 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Besides, you can still see their post history simply by searching

"u/username" site:reddit.com

It gives people a false sense of security

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, but it's an extra step many won't take.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If someone had a dedicated stalker, that stalker would definitely take extra steps to keep going.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 78 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Most of Reddit was bots interacting with bots a while ago already.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 56 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The site makes most of its money selling ads. The value of that ad space is based on user metrics.

Many users are now fake. They are actively hiding this fact.

Apropos of nothing, the company has a $34 billion market cap.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Why is anyone paying for adverts that no one will see though? Surely adverts only have value if it brings in sales.

Would be amusing to see the entire advertising market crash tbh.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 month ago (4 children)

You think that in 2025 companies with large media budgets are buying digital ads and just saying "well fuck it maybe we'll make money on it"?

They track EVERYTHING. From the impression to the click tot he purchase, and there are trackers and attribution platforms by the hundreds out there to help them understand what the ROI they're receiving on those ads are.

Companies are buying ads because people are buying products.

Even if the site is 90% bots there are enough real people using the site to make buying ads profitable.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] yakko@feddit.uk 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

From your lips to god's ears

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's extremely difficult to measure the effectiveness of online ads and most companies have an incentive to inflate their numbers since they're sold as a certain number of views/impressions.

Advertising is a scam for both those who buy it and the intended audience.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Pyro@programming.dev 66 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Never been more glad to have left that sinking ship early

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] nomorebillboards@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Mfw putting "author:username" into the Reddit search bypasses this

[–] ddplf@szmer.info 31 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Which is the worst of two worlds, because now most people will still not be able to verify other account's credibility, however people with bad intentions - who are usually more prepared - will still be able to continue their activities.

Now imagine you're a fragile person who's really paranoid about their internet activity. This is obviously a good change for them, so they click it. One day, someone decides to use this backdoor to bully that person by insulting them under multiple posts and comments that were meant not to be traceable. I can only imagine the consequences.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you want to be anonymous on the internet you can't rely on some website to protect you.I get your point but people need to really start learning the reality of the internet again.

[–] ddplf@szmer.info 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is an example of social darwinism. That doesn't mean I don't agree with this idea, it's just that I don't agree that it is viable to expect it from everyone.

Companies must be forced to care about peoples' security and privacy. Actively fighting against bots infestation would be a part of that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 53 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Congrats for the moderator of /r/Jailbait for becoming a billionaire! /s

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh god, I had forgotten about that...

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Note to self: If the Epstein files ever come out, search for Steve Huffman in them.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

He might not have been rich enough yet to be in that club at the time.

They have openly hired a diddler though. Was a big story for a while. Don't remember all the details except of course they did not allow much discussion of it.

[–] n0respect@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Bots only upvote their own bot circle or content which makes their owners $$$$.

Real human concerns will only be heard if they align with $$$$.

We are remaking the whole world for bots.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

There used to be a site called Reddit, where you were your post history. Now that site is dead - the URL still works, I guess, but it links to some weird Twitter with an alien logo.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] muse@piefed.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 month ago

I see it a lot with AskReddit, surveying (or possibly influencing) how people feel when something happened in the news. Those posts get bumped to the front page.

[–] Themosthighstrange@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Reddit is bots talking to bots

[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

Reddit is admin bots banning real people for messing with other bots.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 24 points 1 month ago

It seems to me that the combination of AI + engagement stats + advertising rates is probably enabling historically massive fraud.

But if the perpetrators of the fraud are tech giants worth trillions, and the companies selling the ads are the same tech giants worth trillions, how are individuals and small companies supposed to make good decisions about their ad budgets or do anything about the fraud?

I'm not going to shed any tears for the advertising industry, but I'm not looking forward to the side effects if the AI bubble pops and vaporizes $10 trillion of tech market cap. (all the big players would still be worth a trillion dollars but people would lose their shit)

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago (4 children)
[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Its spirit is dead, but its corpse lingers on.

[–] Manticore@lemmy.nz 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No. It's definitely not what is was, for sure. But while search engines (especially Google) are so fucking bad, adding 'reddit' to your search is still the best way to get answers to your actual question and not just irrelevant sponsors and paid plugs.

Ofc that's probably a big reason why reddit has swarms of bots for grass roots advertising.... it's a vicious slippery circle of slop

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I haven't found a useful Reddit result that is less than two years old. Bot answers don't provide the same value as actual human expertise. Go figure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Not even close. It simply has too much critical mass.

Twitter was taken over by a white south african nazi and grifter with delicate sensibilities and people are still using it like nothing has happened.

Reddit would have to enshitify even more, and believe me they are trying.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 20 points 1 month ago

Transcription4chan greentext post with a photo of a robot with its mouth open wide in surprise, wearing glasses and an orange singlet with the Reddit logo on it:

>be me bored redditor
>click on obvious bot account using ChatGPT
>want to check post history for confirmation
>"this user has no posts"
>wtf.jpg
>realize reddit added an option to make post history invisible
>bots now basically untraceable
>reddit "accidentally" made it harder to tell real users from bots
>engagement numbers go up nobody questions it

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 month ago

Wait, hold on, slow down. Are you telling me there are bots on Reddit?

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

All while they partner with Google for ai training.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Idk people used my reddit post trails to be creepy little bitches back in the day.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But then how would you check if someone is a disingenuous troll, or a hypocrite, etc, it's the usual privacy vs open information trade off

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

The only thing on the UX manager's mind, when considering this decision, was “engagement.”

Nothing else is even in their same universe.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

A post made on a public forum is public information. I've used post history to figure out if someone was serious vs telling a joke that fell flat or for weird patterns.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

Eh. If a webcrawer took a snapshot, they could just be indexed anyways. Its false sense of security.

Just like upvote/downvotes on Lemmy. Btw its all public lemvotes.org

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

bots on fedi have been probing for an algorithm to exploit. not getting far, just annoying.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I've memorized most of the comment scripts on reddit at this point. Going to the comments is like eating dog food because youre bored.

load more comments
view more: next ›