this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
80 points (98.8% liked)

Movies & TV

23607 readers
148 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tombruzzo@hexbear.net 36 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

People say the first Avatar had no lasting cultural impact, but do you think it's because it ultimately had the correct message about something most crackkkers wouldn't be comfortable talking about? Sometimes this sort of slop sticks around because people on Twitter are like 'look at this wild scene from this movie you forgot about' of they'll be like 'What did the director mean by this?'

Aside from a dumb story and some bad dialogue, Avatar has an anti-imperialist message and positions the humans who represent the US military as a whole as the bad guys. It also has allusions to how the native Americans were treated and how the US does 9/11 every day to other countries and its no big deal when it happens to them. People probably don't want to dwell on that for too long.

[–] Wheaties@hexbear.net 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, it had a cultural impact when it came out. That's more than you can say for films released today.

[–] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

i remember the blue fleshlights too kbity-how

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 27 points 3 weeks ago

How is the average amerikkkan supposed to remember cheering for US Marines getting fucking obliterated by arrows the size of pool cues?

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 34 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

i googled avatar 3 to see if avatar 3 came out and typo'd avatar 4 and yes they're making avatar 4

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 25 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

i googled avatar 3 and

three hours seventeen minutes

this is one of the major reasons why i don't go to theaters anymore

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 44 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

COVID-19? Positive

Legs? Asleep

Pants? Pissed

Yup, it's cinema time

[–] nothx@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I don’t miss it at all.

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I watched it at outdoor cinema and it was about 6 degrees by the time the movie wrapped up (during summer)

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago

Popcorn? Thrown

Chicken? Jockied

[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Why is a long film bad? Maybe I'm just an old fart but I enjoy something that I can soak in. Intermissions are nice though to stretch.

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 18 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Long films are fine, but for a movie theater I've found that two hours is my limit. If they brought back intermissions for films (which they should!) I wouldn't mind doing a long one though.

[–] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Do long films have intermissions anymore? They used to have intermissions where you could go get food, bathroom, talk to people and stuff and make a night of it when you're watching a 3+ hour movie which makes way more sense.

[–] Inui@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The theaters will sometimes ask for movies that are like 3 hours long, but the studios giving them the films will not work with them anymore if they do because it messes with their vision or whatever.

[–] Bob_Odenkirk@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago

I prefer long films in the cinema to home. In my house I’ll distracted after a while, at the theatre I can really get focussed and immersed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 17 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Intermission are crucial. I smoke, I demand the break for that so I don't start jonesing near the climax of the film. But also I think any movie can get 90 minutes.of my free time for granted and the longer it goes after the more it needs to earn it. Some movies need to be long, some movies don't need to be long but theyre better for it.

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Dune 2 was too long with unnecessary sequences

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

you could take a nicotine suppository

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 13 points 3 weeks ago

James Cameron should be the only person on earth allowed to make a movie over 90 minutes

[–] gezginorman@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

according to imdb they're filming avatar 5

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago

They should put Smash Mouth in that one.

[–] DogThatWentGorp@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm more interested in the retrospective video essays than the films at this point.

Not that video essayists aren't making banger stuff, to be clear.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I saw the first one in imax ON MUSHROOMS and I was bored.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Don't be the guy in Metropolitan who only reads literature criticism and not the books.

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 12 points 3 weeks ago

I don't read posts just comments

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago

Since waaay before the first one the idea was always to make 5 movies. James Cameron has been planning and creating Avatar since the 90s.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago

We've decided to keep making Avatar for 50 years. With endless options for sequels!

[–] deforestgump@hexbear.net 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago

Killed fitty blue men.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 21 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Fantasy dwarf dating a drow?

[–] 9to5@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Its from the Avatar Franchise (the movies ...not the kids animation)

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh, I remember that original movie by M Night Shyamalan about the boy with the blue arrow on his forehead that could move air with his mind or whatever — cool movie! It's the highest grossing movie of all time for a reason, certainly, and just as certainly the highlight of Shyamalan's career, but I somehow never heard there was a sequel… Of course, as you say, M Night Shyamalan's Avatar is not to be confused with the Nickelodeon children's animated series Avatar: The Battle for Pandora created by James Cameron, his only ever foray into children's TV cartoons, and a damn successful one at that.

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago

Huh? What's that supposed to mean? I'm just talking about some of my favorite movies and shows from my childhood. sanae-boomer

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ahh ok. I recognise the general, not so much the other but I haven't seen Fire and Ash.

[–] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The dude is the bad guys from the first one and the navi is the evil queen from the new one, both are allied i think

[–] Leon_Grotsky@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

But didn't he blue himself at some point? IDK I only watched the first one

[–] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think he did, i think its the origin of this emote

real-navi-patriot

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wheaties@hexbear.net 13 points 3 weeks ago

He dies in the first movie, the second movie starts with the company uploading a backup scan of his brain to a blue body.

[–] thefunkycomitatus@hexbear.net 19 points 3 weeks ago

Long time and proud James Cameron hater here. I do not have to take this series seriously when the creator does not. I do not care if the tropes from old John Wayne movies read State & Revolution in pidgin English for 3 hours. You do not, under any circumstances, "gotta hand it to James Cameron."

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Kind of a segue but I just realized I have way more right wing friends than I have liberal friends. Maybe I’m the token brown dude to all of them but a lot of people who’ve welcomed me into their group have been joe rogan looneys and alot of the most exclusionary people have been libs.

Not trying to sanction fash bullshit, but there truly is a reason why everyone hates the libs from either of the two major parties.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 34 points 3 weeks ago

You need a better source of friends.

[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago

Every gusana relationship

[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hate me if you like but as someone generally pretty disinterested in going to the movies I'll check this new one out. First time going to see a film in cinemar since a screening of baraka a few years back.

It just seems like most films made don't really justify the expense and hassle of a theatre. Sure it's slop but it's beautiful slop, as opposed to fascist capeshit and artistically empty dramas that make up most of what seems to come out in the mainstream.

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

One of James Cameron's smarter ideas about Avatar is its shit unless you watch it on the biggest screen possible. Its why it makes "All of the money".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 14 points 3 weeks ago

One Battle After Another

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

wasnt the thing with the pandarans that they had tails or were those ponytails

[–] towhee@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Ponytails, however the fire tribe cut theirs off. They might also have tails actually, I don’t remember

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago

They do also have tails.

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago

Pandarens mostly had top knots iirc

load more comments
view more: next ›