this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
877 points (99.2% liked)

Political Memes

10117 readers
1598 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am tired of this world, these people. I am tired of being caught in the tangle of their lives.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 41 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I had previous learned that we will run out of oil soon. It seems this is not the scientific consensus - it's just that known reserves will run out in about 50 years. In other words, this meme can repeat itself ad nauseam. We should look at every US geopolitical strategy or even statement through this lens. Greenland? Canada? Oil!

[–] JustAnotherPodunk@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks to the improvements in efficiency and price fluctuations that allowed shale oil extraction and the like, as well as new exploration, for all intents and purposes, we still have a basically unlimited amount of oil.

When oil gets expensive, it justifies infrastructure that was previously economically unfeasible and not part of our reserves. And once that infrastructure is in place, the price can still go down and it can sustain itself. Is it really unlimited? Absolutely not. But innovation and economics have stretched what's available to a level of surprising longevity.

At this rate of price fluctuation and investment, in 300 years we will be extracting the oil from your facial pores and still have a "50 year reserve".

It's kinda a neat thing if it wasn't for all the shitty side effects, tbh.

[–] RidderSport@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

And since BASF already invented methods to revert plastic to oil, if the price is right, we wouldn't even need oil anymore, just trash.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Do you think Americans were not bombing brown people when Democrats were in power? Didn't Obama get a Nobel Peace Prize while having a top score in drone kill strikes? Lol. The empire is evil and murderous, regardless of who's playing the part of the leader.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 27 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This was about starting wars for oil though

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

We aren't both-sidesing this, are we?

Obama was a breath of fresh air on the international stage and widely respected, globally for good reason. It was clear to anyone paying even half attention that he was confronting powerful forces.

Couple points of fact to mention:

  • Obama used drone strikes, yes.
  • These Drone Strikes are orders of magnitude more precise with far less collateral damage than traditional warfare strategies used by his predecessors.
  • Obama passed an executive order making these drone strikes transparent to the public, understanding the danger.
  • Trump came in and reversed that transparency, making them classified.
  • Obama's civilian death toll is significantly less than Trump's first term alone.

By the way:

  • Nearly all dissenting opinions on Iraq and Afghanistan originated from Democrats or Independents who caucused with Democrats for good reason.
  • Nearly all later dissent came from this side as well.
  • A Democrat is the one who actually got us out of Iraq
  • A Democrat is the one who actually got us out of Afghanistan
  • A Democrat is the one who actually stayed on task to eliminate Bin Laden.

Republicans start wars; Democrats usually get them out. Perfect? No. But there is a very, very clear trend.

Getting tired of seeing this false equivalence nonsense.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Obama was awarded the Nobel only nine months into his first term, so he hadn't really had the chance to rack up the requisite number of war crimes to be awarded the peace prize.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who’s ready to send there kids off to war to die for oil, I mean freedom? 🫲🍊🫱

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

No, this time it's drugs.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

How Americans don't take this as a sign that their electoralism is always bound for failure will forever remain a mystery to me. You emerge from the fallout of Republican leaders by voting democrats and joyously claim, "the storm has passed" and "we should never repeat these mistakes". Come 8 or so years and a Republican is re-elected.

How have you guys not en masse realized that democratic reign is merely a refractory period for Republican governance? Why have you not organized and promoted other parties? The greens are slow and will take a lot of work to build, but Rome wasn't built in a day. This cycle will continue until you've en masse woken up to the real contradictions driving your politics.

Spiel over!

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 week ago

our constitution is intentionally structured to favor the wants and needs of capital holders instead of the working people

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's less that than people think dems are doing OK then go back to their shitty apathy that lets Republicans back in. Rinse, repeat.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NIB@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The Gulf War was about kicking Iraq out of Kuwait, after Iraq invaded. It had a wide support, both worldwide and within the Arab world. Saudi Arabia and Egypt actively participated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War

Check the coalition drop down.

Iraq invaded Kuwait because economic collapse and oil disputes thinking the west won't go to war for this emirate.

Don't come citing the deep magic, I was there when it was written.

[–] Kornblumenratte@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago

The 2003 Gulf war was about oil, that's why the US started it in the first place. It was also about defending the souverainity of an invaded country, that's why a lot of countries followed.

[–] potpotato@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

From your Wiki link:

_The invasion was primarily over disputes regarding Kuwait's alleged slant drilling in Iraq's Rumaila oil field

The conflict's environmental impact included Iraqi forces causing over six hundred oil well fires and the largest oil spill in history until that point._

[–] SantasMagicalComfort@piefed.world 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I hope Biden runs again in 2028 to fix this back up.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I hope that's a joke; the elderly shouldn't be in charge.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

obama will really break thier minds, if trump runs a 3rd time, so can he.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

He might be a zombie by then. It would still be a step up.

The 1980s were another big part of this trend.

load more comments
view more: next ›