this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
567 points (96.7% liked)

196

5069 readers
2597 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 day ago

Marx was an author. He'd probably be more amazed by the Internet.

"Wait, so anybody in the world can read my book using that magic rectangle? How much advance notice do you need to provide? None? You can just open up any page, any chapter instantly? And you can do it from anywhere? And it's not just my book? It's Kant's books too? Hegel's? And providing access to these books is so cheap that it's not even worth charging for? And you can do this with any book ever written? Oh, only old books. New books are copyrighted and expensive. Artificial scarcity. Riiiiiight, capitalism. Did you know I wrote a book on that? You can read it on that magic rectangle of yours for free."

[–] lauha@lemmy.world 81 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"no Marx, the part was like 50 years ago. I'm asking about your view on 2018."

"Holy shit, you split the fucking atom and rained doom in Japan."

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Traveling across the world in flying machines is just an everyday thing you can do?"

[–] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"But you're making the world uninhabitable by doing so? And you're still doing it?"

This should be the least surprising thing to Marx tbh

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's nothing. Tell him why the Americans were so highly motivated to get there before Russia.

to develop ICBM tech.

let's face it, the space race was just a public facing excuse to sugarcoat research in ICBMs.

once the tech was mature enough to get to the moon. the budget plummeted.

[–] halvar@lemy.lol 99 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Using my time machine I tried to contact all the great minds of the past but they all got stuck in their thought process when I told them about the moonlanding. Then I've gone to some other dudes and tried not telling them about the moonlanding, but they kept asking so it seems most philosophers were just interested in philosophy as a side gig while they couldn't think about what's on the moon.

The moon is amazing. The idea that it was a real place real people have gone to just sitting there in plain view made love it more as a kid.

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Stop!! You are disrupting the timelines too much! If you create any more temporal paradoxes the universe is gonna collapse.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

Probably for the best. We had a good run, but I don't know if we should let this go any further.

[–] halvar@lemy.lol 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

chill out the paradoxes always resolve themselves

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

Except they’ve resolved themselves to where we are now…

[–] milk@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait til you hear that they did surgery on a grape

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They did surgery on a grape

[–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A grape in the fucking sky?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] JayDee 3 points 1 day ago

Grape skin.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 77 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Capitalism didn’t get us to the moon. Capitalism got us space debris.

[–] Bigfishbest@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Fun fact, the Soviets were the real space pioneers. They pretty much were first at everything except the moon landing.

I can back this up with a list from one of Carl Sagan's books if there are sceptics out there.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

In my view, the Soviets won the Space Race, as they got most successes. The Americans may have their credit with the moon landing.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

I mean sure, you can win every race if you call it when you're in the lead 🤦

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

@Bigfishbest@lemmy.world

@birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Watch For All Mankind, amazing alt-universe stuff.

Actually winner of the Space Race goes toNorth Korea... lmfao

North Korea, Best Korea /joke

[–] electricyarn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

They won the race to the moon but never finished.

[–] ChilledPeppers@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I mean, thats correct, but they were never able to make a rocket big enough for the moon landing. They got stuck with their absurdly gigantic ships and the US overtook them.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

But they did. The N1 was just as powerful as the saturn V. But they struggled getting the engines stable enough to fly. And there was a lot of poltical infighting to ever get it fully operation. And then the US beat them to the moon, destroying the last poltical will.

[–] hobovision@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

If they couldn't get the engines stable enough to fly, did they really make a moon rocket? They certainly built a really big rocket shaped building filled with rocket fuel.

It's like saying SpaceX Starship is an orbital vehicle. Sure, it would be if it does it, but if SpaceX were to abandon the project before it achieved orbit then they can't claim they made the biggest orbital vehicle.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The N1 was absolutely not as capable as the Saturn 5. N1 was only capable of 95 tons to low earth orbit and 33 tons to trans trans lunar injection, compared to the Saturn 5 being capable of 140 tons in to low earth orbit and 43.5 tons to trans lunar injection.

The N1 had a lot of technical limitations in its design. The tanks were much heavier per volume of fuel carried. The computers were bulky and comparatively primitive. And while the staged combustion NK engines were technically impressive in their own right, their specific impulse paled in comparison to the hydrolox J-2s, and the fact that only 5 F-1s were needed just made it fundamentally more reliable than the NK-15 which couldn’t be tested because of their single use valves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

... and some vaporized astronauts.

[–] jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Mostly space debris. Also we got a bunch of tech along the way. GPS and cellular among a few.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 3 points 2 days ago

Also CCD's!

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 2 points 2 days ago

solar panels are a big one

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I mean if socialism is celebrated for the other space achievements then seems as sensible to celebrate capitalism for the moon

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 days ago (5 children)

The competition between the communist USSR and the capitalist USA is what got us there that fast. Seeing how most capitalists seem to have a burning hatred for fundamental research, and the space race wasn't directly profitable, I'm not sure capitalism alone would have got us there even by now.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's kinda hard to give credit to capitalism for that when it couldn't have happened without heavy government involvement.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Private sector was heavily involved in it. It feels like we're going to strange lenghts to dedicate achievements to one system and to deny them from the other. Capitalist US got to the moon, socialist USSR did other amazing space achievements. If anything to me it seems like neither should get the credit. Give it to the countries who made them happen and the people behind the projects instead of economic systems.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, the private sector was by needs involved, because a space program requires industrial supply chains, and those were mostly private. They never would have achieved it without collective, government action. (Even SpaceX only exists because of NASA.) Saying that "capitalism did it," when it manifestly did not, because of oversimplifications like "capitalist US" is misleading. At best, capitalist in that use is synecdoche. At worst, it's political woo woo, since the US is far from pure capitalism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I agree with this take honestly.

If you credit solely Capitalism for getting to the moon, then you have to solely credit socialism for getting to space.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 2 points 2 days ago

And it's not like getting to space was some feature of either system, rather just result of US and USSR having a massive rivalry about it. You could've had that between two capitalist or socialist countries with the same result.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So you can use potable water to clean you butt, but people think it's icky so they walk around with unwashed asses? And then you lick these asses for sexual pleasure? And there are these thin bricks in your pockets you can use to watch?

oh sorry, you misdialed franklin again.

[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I doubt the people who like anal are the same people who not wash their butts.

Or they are and they're a real mess

[–] allriledup@piefed.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

holy shit, it's almost 10 years since 2018. Surely 2018 was only last year??

It's yet to come. Five years from now.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

covid in 2019. man, that was one hell of a decade.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 18 points 2 days ago

So even Karl Marx questions the moon landing? Wake up people!

I do think he'd have certain notes about modern manufacturing productivity

load more comments
view more: next ›