this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
1119 points (99.5% liked)

politics

27418 readers
3610 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The footage of the fatal shooting of Alex Jeffrey Pretti, said one journalist, “shows that the final act of his life was trying to help a woman who was being physically assaulted by the masked agents who would then kill him.”

In the original video of the shooting of a man in Minneapolis, identified by the Minneapolis Star Tribune at 37-year-old Alex Jeffrey Pretti, a woman in a pink coat was seen in the background filming the incident with her phone. 

Drop Site News obtained footage that appeared "to come from the direction of the woman in pink filming from the sidewalk" and showed the shooting at a closer distance than the footage taken from inside Glam Doll Donuts. 

In the video, the shooting victim, dressed in a brown coat and pants, is seen filming a federal agent with his phone. He's then seen guiding another person toward the sidewalk as the agent forcefully shoves a third person to the ground.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 36 points 7 hours ago

Something I was just made aware of: after shooting and killing Alex Pretti, ICE officers then stood back and shot him 5 more times.

[–] ChonkyLincoln@lemmy.zip 47 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

ICE murdered that man.

From here we have two paths:

One: Civility is eventually restored to government and these people are tried and convicted for their crimes.

Two: All out civil war.

We will not let ICE, Trump or any of these Nazis complete their agenda.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 28 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

There's a third option: people don't resist and the regime does whatever it wants.

So far we've chosen that option.

[–] llacook@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I want to believe that the killing of Good and Pretti will be a turning point…but I’m a middle aged American who has developed some cynicism about my fellow countrymen…

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

That would be pretti goode. I hope that happens

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 13 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

The third option is what I expect from years of "American exceptionalism" brainwashing.

[–] MashedHobbits@lemy.lol 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I expect them to act smug and talk about the midterms.

[–] MortUS@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago* (last edited 11 minutes ago)

100% - You're suggesting to fight the U.S. Military in power. History has shown that nobody "wins" against the American Military. (inb4 some obscure factoid). Even in Vietnam or Afghanistan, it was just destruction - nobody won anything except the investors.

There's 0 leadership down in the trenches too. So ontop of suggesting to fight the U.S. Military, you're suggesting to do so as unorganized. That's going to be easily spun by media as terrorist cells. Sure, they're throwing around "domestic terrorist" already, but it hits differently when they only see 1 side dying. Once there are actual gunfights in the street is when they can rally support from their base for actual action.

We have to wait for midterms. There's been so much bad press regarding Trumps 2nd term that regaining control of the Senate is doable, albeit difficult. In the chance that the Senate is held, then there's a chance to restore order and bring people to justice. Midterms is going to be impossible to avoid for those who participate so it's going to be impossible to avoid the onslaught of bullshit that ensues and will be a wake up call for the people not on Lemmy (or Reddit) and still on Facebook or X (Boomers).

Personally, I think a Civil War in inevitable. I don't think the Trump Admins are going to recede power. I don't think Dems are going to get a majority in the Senate, and I think things are going to get worse. That being said, Midterms is a chance to find leadership and a chance for actual States to break out of this charade.

[–] Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Ironically that's how things went so wrong in Russia, too.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

Germany too. Dont Be A Sucker should be alll over social media

[–] CptEnder@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Military coup. The only way a civil war is successful is if the military are on the side of the people. The most important of which would be the USN and USAF Strategic Forces. A prolonged ground war is only won by sea, air, and nuclear forces. More specifically nuclear forces in the hands of said military who will NOT use them on our own land.

It will present a serious challenge with all the Pentagon purges. But the majority of Flag and Line officers are from West Point, Annapolis, and Maxwell. It's unlikely most side with Trump (for now). The real trick will hinge on the NCOs, as the US Military is predominantly a middle-out force, and senior NCOs hold the bulk of our service members' respect. What they decide to do in the majority will dictate the outcome of a civil war. One NG commander already stated publicly he will order his soldiers to protect protesters from ICE agents. There is a small chance.

Ideally the next time President Trump boards Marine 1 he's taken into custody at a military base with a large Delta, Rangers, or NG presence to subdue USSS agents. With a Federal Judge, Vance, Speaker Johnson, and Grassley in tow. Invoke 25 or Martial Law, and go down the line of succession until someone takes the oath. This is highly unlikely though. A full impeachment is more likely, but a lot of people will need to for die before it will happen.

It's either that or The Man in The High Castle. The American Fourth Reich.

[–] MashedHobbits@lemy.lol 1 points 2 hours ago

A military coup will not help, assassinating Republican leaders will.

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 18 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"What the f*ck did you do?"

NEEDS to be embraced as a slogan with the same passion as "Let's Go Brandon"

It's the perfect Anti-ICE, Anti-Trump, Anti-Capitalist message.

It calls back to the decades of intelligent well educated Americans saying this was an inevitability given the obvious path we've been on.

[–] nuclear_wizard@startrek.website 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I saw a guy walking around town the other day with a sign that said, "Are we great yet?" and felt like that was a great little slogan that confronts Trump supporters with the fact that all of this was supposedly being done to restore whatever personally idealized version of "great" America once embodied to them. Pretty sure the majority of people who voted for Trump wouldn't even say that using federal agents to murder Americans in the street for exercising their constitutional right to protest is included in their own personal definition of the "greatness" that they feel America needs to get back to.

[–] btsax@reddthat.com 1 points 27 minutes ago

It's a good message for the non-insane, but anyone still pro-Trump will just tell themselves that we haven't gotten rid of enough gays/immigrants/trans people yet for the country to be as great as it once was in some imagined past. In that light the sign has an ambiguous interpretation

[–] JackBinimbul@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 9 hours ago

He saved that woman's life, but I cannot imagine how she feels right now. I would be sick with survivor's guilt.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 32 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

This is just straight up murder. He shot man in the back a dozen times with no threat to his safety at all, this is AFTER they gang beat him to the ground for no reason. This is unacceptable.

Best video I've seen:

https://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1qm2vi0/heres_your_proof_with_the_moment_of_truth_isolated/

[–] ambientdread@lemmy.world 21 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Trump's Taliban doing summary street executions now.

Thugs checklist:

  1. Pepper spray
  2. Push down on ground
  3. Feral pack pile on
  4. Run off with the gun they stole
  5. Empty clips into prone body
[–] OldManWithACane@lemmy.zip 12 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

5 happened before 4

Its a minor detail, but really highlights the heinous nature of what happened here. They disarmed him before executing him.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Honestly, i think its a pretty major detail. They disarmed him and then shot him 10 times. Its what changes this from murder to execution. The man was not a threat the whole time but after they took his only means of being a threat they then killed him and are claiming he was a threat. They neutered their own defence. If he still had the gun when they shot him they would have an easier time lying about what happened.

[–] ambientdread@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Yep. Fixed.

[–] poddus@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

We need to see the video he was making, you know, the one to hold the ICE agents accountable, the one they killed him for

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

We never will see that one. The ICEholes will have taken it as "evidence" so they can destroy it.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If his icloud or google account can be accessed then it is likely the video exists still. I doubt those agents were smart enough to realise this and likely destroyed the phone thinking that would do it.

Can apple or google access your photos and videos?

[–] btsax@reddthat.com 1 points 26 minutes ago

Yes they can but they'll only do it when they're sucking up to federal law enforcement

load more comments
view more: next ›