this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
896 points (96.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

10494 readers
2814 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zink@programming.dev 30 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Engagement bait.

I went and checked Facebook for notifications the other day and saw this exact post.

This is all over the place: Posts by people who are confidently wrong in some obvious way, just begging for some smart internet person to come set them straight and get their wimpy dopamine hit.

It is really enlightening, in a depressing way, to scroll mainstream social media like that and see the level of enshittification that people are conditioned to accept and keep scrolling through. It is so much worse than even ad-driven legacy media like live TV.

[–] sahin@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Problem is, we cant stop this.

[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 2 points 14 hours ago

I don’t like it one bit. But please do have my upvote because you are sadly spot on.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 6 points 21 hours ago

Yep. It works.

It caught my attention before I decided to ignore it, and even some of the early replies in these comments correctly pointing out the stupidity of the driver's ways have hundreds of upvotes, which is a lot for Lemmy!

[–] socsa@piefed.social 15 points 21 hours ago

This is actually very funny tho

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Reminds me of that dude that fashioned a concrete reinforced steel mailbox pole and got sued after paralysing a dude that hit it.

https://www.lipstickalley.com/threads/homeowner-who-fortified-his-mailbox-after-repeated-vandalism-is-sued-by-driver-who-was-left-paralyzed-after-crashing-into-it.4580112/

Homeowner won though.

[–] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 8 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Reminder that the word "homeowner" is the only English word with the word "meow" in it (except for all the different derivations of "meow" like "meowing" etc of course).

Good luck not reading homeowner as ho-meow-ner from now on

[–] funksoulkitchen@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks I didnt know but will spread this message IRL

[–] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 17 hours ago

The world needs to know

[–] modus@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Cletus Snay was driving to work in December 2016 when his Ford pick-up truck crashed into Matthew Burr's mailbox after losing traction on black ice.

What a very American sentence.

[–] ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Do other nations not have ice or work in December?

[–] modus@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

The "Cletus driving a pickup into a mailbox part."

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Wtf is that article? The first 6 paragraphs literally keep repeating the same info???

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Behold the rewards of not linking to source: commenters fall for engagement bait, lack of web accessibility.

Post needs link to source for web accessibility and web connectivity.Images of text break much that text alternatives do not. Losses due to image of text lacking alternative such as link:

  • usability
    • we can't quote the text without pointless bullshit like retyping it or OCR
    • text search is unavailable
    • the system can't
      • reflow text to varied screen sizes
      • vary presentation (size, contrast)
      • vary modality (audio, braille)
  • accessibility
    • lacks semantic structure (tags for titles, heading levels, sections, paragraphs, lists, emphasis, code, links, accessibility features, etc)
    • some users can't read the image due to lack of alt text (markdown image description)
    • users can't adapt the text for dyslexia or vision impairments
    • systems can't read the text to them or send it to braille devices
  • web connectivity
    • we have to do failure-prone bullshit to find the original source
    • we can't explore wider context of the original message
  • authenticity: we don't know the image hasn't been tampered
  • searchability: the "text" isn't indexable by search engine in a meaningful way
  • fault tolerance: no text fallback if
    • image breaks
    • image host is geoblocked due to insane regulations.

Contrary to age & humble appearance, text is an advanced technology that provides all these capabilities absent from images.

[–] topherclay@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

::: Behold, the most selfish way to take up

  • vertical

    • space

in a comment section. :::

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Behold your junk software. Shit renders right (takes little space) in a standard web browser.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

A) I don’t believe this is real.

B) Back in the ‘70s, there was an article in National Lampoon where a guy liked to put a cinder block in a paper bag and watch people swerve to hit it.

[–] TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de 110 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The guy's page is full of trolling and rage bait. It's not serious

[–] Pee_comes_from_the_balls@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It still appeared serious enough to be upvoted by 700 people. I guess this speaks more on how the sanity of linkedin users is perceived than it speaks on the validity of the situation. And yeh, linkedin users are a bit fucked in the head.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, it's the internet, it's like a 70/30 chance of it being someone who's really that entitled and stupid or just being troll bullshit

We do not know, and therefore should abstain from deducing fallacies out of air. I only commented on what was actually observable and relatable.

[–] cv_octavio@piefed.ca 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

He's wrong though, this is objectively funny. I would love to hear the conversation with insurance, bet that's funny too. 

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 16 hours ago

"So you intentionally drove off the road to hit a snowman that was, unknown to you, filled with bricks?" "Yes" "Okay, were there children present near this snowman?" "Uhhhhhhh, no" "Okay, you do see how stupid this was, right?" "Uhh no" "Okay, well your claim is denied for reckless driving, to start"

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 586 points 2 days ago (9 children)

If you plow through a snowman with your car, you're an asshole. If you do it with your brand new sports car, you're a stupid asshole.

[–] BattleGrown@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Sometimes kids do it as a prank in the middle of the road

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 316 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Let me add one more: he's done this several times already which is the reason the kids added bricks in the first place.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 132 points 2 days ago

Its like a honeypot for assholes.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 147 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Same type of person would drive through a pile of leaves not thinking if there were kids in it.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I don't agree with driving into snowmen, especially if they're not in the street.

Sometimes you can't avoid leaf piles tho. 

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 1 points 15 hours ago

Many kids play in leaf piles, even in the street.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

i thought something was up. a snow man made of the fluffiest powder would absolutely totall my car. ain’t no way i would just hit snow men

[–] some_guy 7 points 1 day ago

I wanna see the zoom video of that court hearing. I don't think a judge is gonna be on your side, buddy.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 105 points 1 day ago (9 children)

So Mark Majeski purposefully crashed his car into a static object and blames someone else for the consequences of his own actions?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 83 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

Thanks for sharing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jessicablaze@lemmynsfw.com 225 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Unless the snowman was built in the road, the driver is at fault not the people that created the snowman.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 167 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I think the fact he doesn't explicitly mention it is an admission that it wasn't built on the road.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] toofpic@lemmy.world 191 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (19 children)

Even in case of a "usual" snowman, you can easily crack plastic bodyparts or dent metal ones. This is not GTA, where you just have to remember which items are breakable and which are not

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] you_are_dust@lemmy.world 121 points 2 days ago (10 children)

What would make you think driving through a snowman is a good idea to begin with? You'd have to be driving through a yard or at least jumping a curb. Take the guy's license away for reckless driving.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 97 points 2 days ago (16 children)

My cousins used to live on a street with massive trees that dropped tons of leaves every autumn. The city would have special service days where everyone rakes the leaves into big piles in the street and street sweepers would come vacuum them up.

Hooligans liked the drive through the big piles in the middle of the night. I honestly kinda see the appeal, who could resist. Anyway, they started to doing the same thing. Piles of cinder blocks under some of them. I was staying with them one night and we heard some horrible carnage, came out to find some sedan high centered on a pile of cinder blocks with the bumper hanging off.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 145 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Don't be an ass trying to wreck some kid's fun. Could just as well do the same if it melted and refroze a bit to turn it to ice. FAFO

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (11 children)

I'd be surprised if there were any legal consequences for something like this. It's not a "booby trap" in the traditional sense where it poses a danger to legitimate visitors or emergency responders entering a property. It is a solid structure inside another (seemingly less solid) structure. You should already not be trying to ram into it. It poses zero risk to anyone that doesn't already intent to maliciously destroy the apparently less solid structure.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›