this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
269 points (99.6% liked)

Not The Onion

20241 readers
2702 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Russian magazine editor claims his publisher demanded he censor a book that mentions homosexuality in animals because it violates the country’s “LGBT propaganda” law.

Viktor Kovylin, editor of the scientific journal Batrachospermum, wrote on Telegram that his publisher told him the descriptions of same-sex behavior in a book on animal sexual behavior were against the law because they did not express “disgust or criticism” for the acts.

“Apparently, neutral scientific descriptions of homosexual behavior, without disgust or criticism, now fall under the category of propaganda for non-traditional relationships!” Kovylin wrote on Telegram, according to a translation.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago

This is exactly what conservatives want in America.

It's shocking that it's not 1950 with some of the news we have these days.

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

This is an opportunity to maliciously comply with the minimum most sarcastic but not super obviously sarcastic disgust possible

facts facts, facts facts facts, ewwww this is yuckyyyyyy facts facts facts facts

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 0 points 54 minutes ago* (last edited 47 minutes ago)

Stories like this are why I chuckle at the "The only thing more powerful than hate is love" memes that are running rampant this morning.

It's like no one's looked out their window recently or ever cracked open a history book.

[–] affenlehrer@feddit.org 54 points 6 hours ago (7 children)

Can someone explain to me why fascists are so obsessed with homosexuality and transgender topics?

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 hour ago

I feel like a lot of fascists try to bake in a lot of hierarchy as the natural order, that this is what nature intended.

Queer people end up being an example that the way nature is isn't as clearly defined as the fascists say it should be

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 2 points 41 minutes ago

Seems this is #12 in Umberto Eco's description of fascism and its hatred towards liberal progressivism:

Since both permanent war and heroism are difficult games to play, the Ur-Fascist transfers his will to power to sexual matters. This is the origin of machismo (which implies both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits, from chastity to homosexuality). Since even sex is a difficult game to play, the Ur-Fascist hero tends to play with weapons — doing so becomes an ersatz phallic exercise.

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/umberto-eco-ur-fascism

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 hours ago

It might be like with witches back in the day. If everybody hates witches, you can call any inconvenient person a witch and dispose them. The other thing is that it alignes with general backwards mentality.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 33 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Because tolerance requires open mindedness and critical thinking. Two things that undermine a fascists regime when the entire population does that. By banning homosexuality the regime basically tells the people that they shouldn’t think beyond their first gut reaction. It’s okay to hate, it’s okay that the police beats up your gay neighbor, it’s okay to not think about it, it’s okay to not think at all.

[–] affenlehrer@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Hm, I'm not sure. Fascists also sometimes also like their audience to "think differently", e.g. disregard science, "wake up" and see the truth and or connect themselves with veganism and nature.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Yeah but they still need to forgo critical thinking. They should only think what Big Brother wants them to think, since publicly criticizing that neo paganism ideology would mean you get a visit from the secret police.

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'd say that the idolisation of a fictional, ideal which society should strive towards but never achieve, allows focusing of opposition. If it weren't for the gays/trans/gypsies/Muslims/immigrants/unemployed/trade unionists (delete as applicable) then society would be as it was used to be, which is always perfect and better than it is now. Of course as society will never be perfect, there must alway be a new group to blame for failure to meet the necessary ideal.

[–] Infrapink@thebrainbin.org 12 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Fascism is a radically conservative ideology obsessed with promotion of (what the fascist sees as) traditional values and behaviours. That includes cisheteronormativity, as queerness isn't traditional anywhere.

[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

I mean, isn't it traditional in parts of south/south-east Asia?

[–] affenlehrer@feddit.org 4 points 4 hours ago

I think their view of traditions is also very selective. E.g. in Germany they prefer to connect with paganism and scandinavian things and not actual German / Christian traditions.

[–] Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It's only my theory however; it's comes down to babys and education, if your population is making babys and lots of them at a young age, things like education and quality of life can suffer dues to having to support kids. Lack of education leads you to belie ving in propaganda more easily. Also lack of education makes you more likely to have kids younger and in less than ideal financial situation. More kids with less education, means it's easier to populate a military. Hopefully you get the idea and sweeping generalisations I've made. Now homosexuals and by proxy transgender don't produce children (ignoring adoption etc etc) so they aren't what the dictators want and they also might give the heterosexuals ideas about not have kids, or at least delaying it, getting and education etc etc. then add in a sprinkling of religion, also good to control uneducated masses, and you have the perfect population for dictator/fascist control

Tldr: they want an uneducated baby producing population

[–] affenlehrer@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago

Sounds plausible but it also a very "long" game, taking at least one additional generation into their teenage years. I guess there are some of them thinking on that level but I have the feeling that the average fascist doesn't plan ahead very far or at has at least a very distorted time perception (e.g. they feel like the white "race" being replaced fearmongering is an urgent topic).

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 19 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

"Penguins can be, and often are, homosexual. Gross."

Kremlin approved!

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

No homo 🤠

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

his publisher told him the descriptions of same-sex behavior in a book on animal sexual behavior were against the law

So it wasn't legally or expressedly banned by the govt. But in authoritarian fear-based and legally unpredictable states it's not unusual for people to individually take rules even further than technically necessary, to affirm their adherence to the system and to be safe from even the smallest suspicion or most ridiculous accusation.

Might be worth noting that the publisher (Eksmo-AST) is one of the biggest book publishers in Russia.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 10 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I'd rather have my kids/friends be gay than being sent to the frontlines to die like a bug for some demented fool.

I'd rather have a gay parade pass by my door every day than have crazy criminal conscripts with PTSD running around free in my neighbourhood.

You don't even have to be a liberal to recognize this.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago

I mean, a gay parade would be nice anyway, regardless.