I also don’t trust his jobs numbers since heads rolled a few Months back.
this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
293 points (99.7% liked)
News
35681 readers
2959 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah. Imagine how bad the real numbers are. I'm sure we will be getting revisions 4 years from now for Trump era figures lol.
2025: 181,000 new jobs, 1.8 million new people.
That's 1 job per 10 new people.
2024: 2,232,000 new jobs and 3.2 million people or 6.97 jobs per 10 new people. (Edited, I accidentally said per 1 new)
2023 saw about 3 million jobs added, and population growth of about 1.6 million people. ~1.875 jobs per new person.
2022 and 2023 were seeing rates so high I believe because we were recovering from the pandemic, but I don't think anyone in their right mind can look at a capitalistic nation that doesn't believe in social programs and say 1 new job per 10 people is sustainable.
The math for 2024 seems to be incorrect.
What was wrong with it. I saw 186,000 jobs/month growth average for 2024. That's 2,232,000 jobs. Population growth around 3.2 million.
Edit: oh I see, I put it out of per ten people in 2025 before and meant to again, lol. My bad
Yeah I was trying to show 2023 was still overly high from people going back to work. But ~7 new jobs per 10 people is decent. As on average 62-63% of our population over 16 work. So if you cut the sub 16 year olds out of the 7/10 it's near sustainable
I think there are figures for the number of new working age adults per year that would probably be the denominator you're interested in. That would account for both babies not needing jobs and old folks retiring. It'll all be roughly correlated with total population though. There are generational bulges and unusual rates of retirement, but it's not going to be a drastic change when comparing year to year stats.
Yeah the variations in such should be fairly nominal comparing such a short gap of 3 years, but over time that would have effect. Like comparing the percentage of youth using data like this: https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/chart-us-population-distribution-by-age-1900-through-2060/
On average we see ~65 being the retirement age for men with some wiggle over the years, for women on the other hand that has drastically increased from 1970 till now. Which should have effected those numbers of who's working much greater over a 50 year time period
... So far
Guys, it's okay! The presidents are only responsible for the jobs market when they're Democrats.
But big stonks good.
Who on earth could have seen this coming? Anyone? Eh?
"That's cool. I'm sure Kamala would have been jUstAsBaD because something something argle bargle status quo and neoliberalism. Also the economy that was the envy of the world when Biden left really didn't have good macroeconomic indicators because, well, reasons."
-- Fans of Murc's Law and reactionary centrism
“Guys we HAVE to vote for Gavin Newsom NO MATTER WHAT or else you WANT TRANS PEOPLE to DIE”
Libs today
Obviously further proof that scary brown people are responsible. /s
And nothing will be learnt.